From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Arjun Roy <arjunroy.kdev@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arjunroy@google.com, edumazet@google.com, soheil@google.com,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next v2] tcp: Explicitly mark reserved field in tcp_zerocopy_receive args.
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 10:49:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c81f79ee-e8d0-2f83-6926-c370e9540730@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210206203648.609650-1-arjunroy.kdev@gmail.com>
On 2/6/21 1:36 PM, Arjun Roy wrote:
> From: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com>
>
> Explicitly define reserved field and require it to be 0-valued.
>
> Fixes: 7eeba1706eba ("tcp: Add receive timestamp support for receive zerocopy.")
> Signed-off-by: Arjun Roy <arjunroy@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
> Suggested-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/tcp.h | 2 +-
> net/ipv4/tcp.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h b/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h
> index 42fc5a640df4..8fc09e8638b3 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/tcp.h
> @@ -357,6 +357,6 @@ struct tcp_zerocopy_receive {
> __u64 msg_control; /* ancillary data */
> __u64 msg_controllen;
> __u32 msg_flags;
> - /* __u32 hole; Next we must add >1 u32 otherwise length checks fail. */
> + __u32 reserved; /* set to 0 for now */
> };
> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_TCP_H */
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index e1a17c6b473c..c8469c579ed8 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -4159,6 +4159,8 @@ static int do_tcp_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
> }
> if (copy_from_user(&zc, optval, len))
> return -EFAULT;
> + if (zc.reserved)
> + return -EINVAL;
> lock_sock(sk);
> err = tcp_zerocopy_receive(sk, &zc, &tss);
> release_sock(sk);
>
The 'switch (len)' statement needs to be updated now that 'len' is not
going to end on the 'msg_flags' boundary? But then, how did that work
before if there was 4 byte padding?
Maybe I am missing something here. You currently have:
switch (len) {
case offsetofend(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive, msg_flags):
which should == 60, yet the struct size is 64 with 4-bytes of padding. A
user doing
int optlen = sizeof(struct tcp_zerocopy_receive);
getsockopt(...., &optlen)
would pass in a value of 64, right?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-07 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-06 20:36 [net-next v2] tcp: Explicitly mark reserved field in tcp_zerocopy_receive args Arjun Roy
2021-02-06 23:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-07 8:26 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-02-08 18:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-09 2:24 ` David Ahern
2021-02-09 2:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-09 3:20 ` David Ahern
2021-02-09 6:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-02-09 16:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-09 23:46 ` Arjun Roy
2021-02-10 4:35 ` David Ahern
2021-02-10 19:23 ` Arjun Roy
2021-02-09 6:15 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-02-09 16:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-09 19:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-02-07 17:49 ` David Ahern [this message]
2021-02-07 17:53 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c81f79ee-e8d0-2f83-6926-c370e9540730@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=arjunroy.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=arjunroy@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=soheil@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).