netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	yangpeihao@sjtu.edu.cn, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
	sinquersw@gmail.com, toke@redhat.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
	jiri@resnulli.us, sdf@google.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
	yepeilin.cs@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 07/11] bpf: net_sched: Allow more optional operators in Qdisc_ops
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:30:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c97e9ab2-dd71-4ce2-8a64-501309b39122@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3bfe9a5-40e8-4a1c-a5e5-0f7f24b9e395@linux.dev>

On 7/25/24 6:15 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_api.c b/net/sched/sch_api.c
>> index 5064b6d2d1ec..9fb9375e2793 100644
>> --- a/net/sched/sch_api.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/sch_api.c
>> @@ -1352,6 +1352,13 @@ static struct Qdisc *qdisc_create(struct net_device *dev,
>>           rcu_assign_pointer(sch->stab, stab);
>>       }
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) && defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT)
>> +    if (sch->flags & TCQ_F_BPF) {
> 
> I can see the reason why this patch is needed. It is a few line changes and they 
> are not in the fast path... still weakly not excited about them but I know it 
> could be a personal preference.
> 
> I think at the very least, instead of adding a new TCQ_F_BPF, let see if the 
> "owner == BPF_MODULE_OWNER" test can be reused like how it is done in the 
> bpf_try_module_get().
> 
> 
> A rough direction I am spinning...
> 
> The pre/post is mainly to initialize and cleanup the "struct bpf_sched_data" 
> before/after calling the bpf prog.
> 
> For the pre (init), there is a ".gen_prologue(...., const struct bpf_prog 
> *prog)" in the "bpf_verifier_ops". Take a look at the tc_cls_act_prologue().
> It calls a BPF_FUNC_skb_pull_data helper. It potentially can call a kfunc 
> bpf_qdisc_watchdog_cancel. However, the gen_prologue is invoked too late in the 

typo. The kfunc should be s/qdisc_watchdog_cancel/qdisc_watchdog_init/ for the pre.

> verifier for kfunc calling now. This will need some thoughts and works.
> 
> For the post (destroy,reset), there is no "gen_epilogue" now. If 
> bpf_qdisc_watchdog_schedule() is not allowed to be called in the ".reset" and 
> ".destroy" bpf prog. I think it can be changed to pre also? There is a ".filter" 
> function in the "struct btf_kfunc_id_set" during the kfunc register.
> 
>> +        err = bpf_qdisc_init_pre_op(sch, tca[TCA_OPTIONS], extack);
>> +        if (err != 0)
>> +            goto err_out4;
>> +    } 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-26 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-14 17:51 [RFC PATCH v9 00/11] bpf qdisc Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 01/11] bpf: Support getting referenced kptr from struct_ops argument Amery Hung
2024-07-24  0:32   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-24 17:00     ` Amery Hung
2024-07-25  1:28       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 02/11] selftests/bpf: Test referenced kptr arguments of struct_ops programs Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 03/11] bpf: Allow struct_ops prog to return referenced kptr Amery Hung
2024-07-24  5:36   ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-07-24 18:27     ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-07-24 20:44     ` Amery Hung
2024-07-26 18:22       ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-07-26 22:45         ` Amery Hung
2024-07-24 23:57   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 04/11] selftests/bpf: Test returning referenced kptr from struct_ops programs Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 05/11] bpf: net_sched: Support implementation of Qdisc_ops in bpf Amery Hung
2024-07-18  0:00   ` Amery Hung
2024-07-25 21:24   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-31  4:09     ` Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 06/11] bpf: net_sched: Add bpf qdisc kfuncs Amery Hung
2024-07-25 22:38   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-31  4:08     ` Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 07/11] bpf: net_sched: Allow more optional operators in Qdisc_ops Amery Hung
2024-07-18  0:01   ` Amery Hung
2024-07-26  1:15   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-26 18:30     ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-07-26 22:30     ` Amery Hung
2024-07-30  0:20       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 08/11] libbpf: Support creating and destroying qdisc Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 09/11] selftests: Add a basic fifo qdisc test Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 10/11] selftests: Add a bpf fq qdisc to selftest Amery Hung
2024-07-19  1:54   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-07-19 18:20     ` Amery Hung
2024-07-14 17:51 ` [RFC PATCH v9 11/11] selftests: Add a bpf netem " Amery Hung
2024-07-17 10:13 ` [RFC PATCH v9 00/11] bpf qdisc Donald Hunter
2024-07-17 22:04   ` Amery Hung
2024-07-19 17:21 ` [OFFLIST RFC 1/4] bpf: Search for kptrs in prog BTF structs Amery Hung
2024-07-19 17:21   ` [OFFLIST RFC 2/4] bpf: Rename ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR -> ARG_KPTR_XCHG_DEST Amery Hung
2024-07-19 17:21   ` [OFFLIST RFC 3/4] bpf: Support bpf_kptr_xchg into local kptr Amery Hung
2024-07-23  0:18     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-24  0:08       ` Amery Hung
2024-07-19 17:21   ` [OFFLIST RFC 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test bpf_kptr_xchg stashing " Amery Hung
2024-07-23  0:19 ` [RFC PATCH v9 00/11] bpf qdisc Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c97e9ab2-dd71-4ce2-8a64-501309b39122@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yangpeihao@sjtu.edu.cn \
    --cc=yepeilin.cs@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).