From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/ipv6: Fix missing rcu dereferences on from
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 08:54:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca16fd6f-f694-8a0f-e19e-26fd54b7f978@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180423183207.9124-3-dsahern@gmail.com>
On 04/23/2018 11:32 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> kbuild test robot reported 2 uses of rt->from not properly accessed
> using rcu_dereference:
> 1. add rcu_dereference_protected to rt6_remove_exception_rt and make
> sure it is always called with rcu lock held.
>
> 2. change rt6_do_redirect to take a reference on 'from' when accessed
> the first time so it can be used the sceond time outside of the lock
>
> Fixes: a68886a69180 ("net/ipv6: Make from in rt6_info rcu protected")
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/route.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index 354a5b8d016f..ac3e51631c65 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -1541,11 +1541,13 @@ static struct rt6_info *rt6_find_cached_rt(struct fib6_info *rt,
> static int rt6_remove_exception_rt(struct rt6_info *rt)
> {
> struct rt6_exception_bucket *bucket;
> - struct fib6_info *from = rt->from;
> struct in6_addr *src_key = NULL;
> struct rt6_exception *rt6_ex;
> + struct fib6_info *from;
> int err;
>
> + from = rcu_dereference_protected(rt->from,
> + lockdep_is_held(&rt6_exception_lock));
This does not make any sense.
We lock rt6_exception_lock a bit later in this function (line 1558)
If we really were holding rt6_exception_lock here we would dead lock.
> if (!from ||
> !(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_CACHE))
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -2223,6 +2225,7 @@ static void ip6_link_failure(struct sk_buff *skb)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-23 18:32 [PATCH net-next 0/2] net/ipv6: couple of fixes for rcu change to from David Ahern
2018-04-23 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/ipv6: add rcu locking to ip6_negative_advice David Ahern
2018-04-23 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/ipv6: Fix missing rcu dereferences on from David Ahern
2018-04-24 15:54 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-04-24 15:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-23 20:13 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] net/ipv6: couple of fixes for rcu change to from David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ca16fd6f-f694-8a0f-e19e-26fd54b7f978@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).