From: Andrew Lutomirski <amluto@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Tell linkwatch about new interfaces
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:40:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb0375e10904010840n1543a890w9039465d0f80ffcc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
From: Andrew Lutomirski <amluto@gmail.com>
When a network driver registers a new interface, linkwatch will not notice,
and hence not set the rfc2863 operstate, until netif_carrier_on gets called.
If the new interface has no carrier when it is connected, then a status of
"unknown" is reported to userspace, which confuses various tools
(NetworkManager, for example).
This fires a linkwatch event for all new interfaces, so that operstate
gets set reasonably quickly.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lutomirski <amluto@gmail.com>
---
This looks like the root cause of the bug I reported here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/24/499
Without knowing all the locking and ordering constraints imposed on network
drivers, this seemed like the safest way to fix the bug. Alternative
approaches would be to call rfc2863_policy directly or to initialize the
relevent fields to sane values (for the carrier off state) in alloc_netdev.
This applies to 2.6.29. I can rediff it for any other tree, but I didn't see
any changes that would conflict.
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index e438f54..45911fd 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4445,6 +4445,9 @@ int register_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
dev->reg_state = NETREG_UNREGISTERED;
}
+ /* Update link state. */
+ linkwatch_fire_event(dev);
+
out:
return ret;
next reply other threads:[~2009-04-01 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-01 15:40 Andrew Lutomirski [this message]
2009-04-05 0:05 ` [PATCH 1/1] Tell linkwatch about new interfaces David Miller
2009-04-05 4:00 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2009-04-10 0:48 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2009-04-11 15:46 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2009-04-13 23:22 ` David Miller
2009-04-14 7:43 ` Jeff Kirsher
2009-07-14 17:17 ` Sergio Luis
2009-07-14 18:33 ` David Miller
2009-07-14 18:37 ` Sergio Luis
2009-07-14 18:58 ` Andrew Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb0375e10904010840n1543a890w9039465d0f80ffcc@mail.gmail.com \
--to=amluto@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).