From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] netlink: extended ACK reporting Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:57:59 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1491894172.31620.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> <9a68aa01-474c-7054-30c2-473ee1250abe@cumulusnetworks.com> <20170411173143.GA1899@salvia> <20170411.134225.398046538225438175.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, jbenc@redhat.com, jiri@resnulli.us To: David Miller , pablo@netfilter.org Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:35231 "EHLO mail-pg0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752151AbdDKS6B (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:58:01 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 81so2788046pgh.2 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:58:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170411.134225.398046538225438175.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 4/11/17 11:42 AM, David Miller wrote: > David, if you have a specific case where it's absolutely impossible > to resolve this when the library is converted to support extended > ACKs, please mention it. I don't have a specific library in mind. It is more the disjoint nature of a socket option and message parsing, and thinking through the API.