From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
dev@openvswitch.org, ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>,
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] openvswitch: switch to per-action label counting in conntrack
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:10:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb6cfbcbdd576ce4f3b74be080b939a9398d21c7.1721268615.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com> (raw)
Similar to commit 70f06c115bcc ("sched: act_ct: switch to per-action
label counting"), we should also switch to per-action label counting
in openvswitch conntrack, as Florian suggested.
The difference is that nf_connlabels_get() is called unconditionally
when creating an ct action in ovs_ct_copy_action(). As with these
flows:
table=0,ip,actions=ct(commit,table=1)
table=1,ip,actions=ct(commit,exec(set_field:0xac->ct_label),table=2)
it needs to make sure the label ext is created in the 1st flow before
the ct is committed in ovs_ct_commit(). Otherwise, the warning in
nf_ct_ext_add() when creating the label ext in the 2nd flow will
be triggered:
WARN_ON(nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct));
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
---
net/openvswitch/conntrack.c | 28 +++++++++++-----------------
net/openvswitch/datapath.h | 3 ---
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
index 8eb1d644b741..2cc38faab682 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
@@ -1368,11 +1368,8 @@ bool ovs_ct_verify(struct net *net, enum ovs_key_attr attr)
attr == OVS_KEY_ATTR_CT_MARK)
return true;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_LABELS) &&
- attr == OVS_KEY_ATTR_CT_LABELS) {
- struct ovs_net *ovs_net = net_generic(net, ovs_net_id);
-
- return ovs_net->xt_label;
- }
+ attr == OVS_KEY_ATTR_CT_LABELS)
+ return true;
return false;
}
@@ -1381,6 +1378,7 @@ int ovs_ct_copy_action(struct net *net, const struct nlattr *attr,
const struct sw_flow_key *key,
struct sw_flow_actions **sfa, bool log)
{
+ unsigned int n_bits = sizeof(struct ovs_key_ct_labels) * BITS_PER_BYTE;
struct ovs_conntrack_info ct_info;
const char *helper = NULL;
u16 family;
@@ -1409,6 +1407,12 @@ int ovs_ct_copy_action(struct net *net, const struct nlattr *attr,
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ if (nf_connlabels_get(net, n_bits - 1)) {
+ nf_ct_tmpl_free(ct_info.ct);
+ OVS_NLERR(log, "Failed to set connlabel length");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
if (ct_info.timeout[0]) {
if (nf_ct_set_timeout(net, ct_info.ct, family, key->ip.proto,
ct_info.timeout))
@@ -1577,6 +1581,7 @@ static void __ovs_ct_free_action(struct ovs_conntrack_info *ct_info)
if (ct_info->ct) {
if (ct_info->timeout[0])
nf_ct_destroy_timeout(ct_info->ct);
+ nf_connlabels_put(nf_ct_net(ct_info->ct));
nf_ct_tmpl_free(ct_info->ct);
}
}
@@ -2002,17 +2007,9 @@ struct genl_family dp_ct_limit_genl_family __ro_after_init = {
int ovs_ct_init(struct net *net)
{
- unsigned int n_bits = sizeof(struct ovs_key_ct_labels) * BITS_PER_BYTE;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER_CONNCOUNT)
struct ovs_net *ovs_net = net_generic(net, ovs_net_id);
- if (nf_connlabels_get(net, n_bits - 1)) {
- ovs_net->xt_label = false;
- OVS_NLERR(true, "Failed to set connlabel length");
- } else {
- ovs_net->xt_label = true;
- }
-
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER_CONNCOUNT)
return ovs_ct_limit_init(net, ovs_net);
#else
return 0;
@@ -2026,7 +2023,4 @@ void ovs_ct_exit(struct net *net)
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER_CONNCOUNT)
ovs_ct_limit_exit(net, ovs_net);
#endif
-
- if (ovs_net->xt_label)
- nf_connlabels_put(net);
}
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/datapath.h b/net/openvswitch/datapath.h
index 9ca6231ea647..365b9bb7f546 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.h
+++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.h
@@ -160,9 +160,6 @@ struct ovs_net {
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER_CONNCOUNT)
struct ovs_ct_limit_info *ct_limit_info;
#endif
-
- /* Module reference for configuring conntrack. */
- bool xt_label;
};
/**
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-18 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-18 2:10 Xin Long [this message]
2024-07-18 13:23 ` [PATCH net-next] openvswitch: switch to per-action label counting in conntrack Paolo Abeni
2024-07-18 13:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-07-18 15:33 ` Xin Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb6cfbcbdd576ce4f3b74be080b939a9398d21c7.1721268615.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ovs-dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).