From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BB8E275AE2 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 17:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753723205; cv=none; b=g+kpSdqREjpOuThCtv8g4zij0Iou1Lp2ERQtqAQJV7504uP/r/+rdPI66LAI7vszyXk2ExnyNrxLu7+cVhkntCL2Iz6hL6cCQu6JUhwP3DxU48SLMOv2kF2chBOzv4FIC+GuGsRnXrKxLNIloltad2IGXYyTdpXpaaWJgeFwFB8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753723205; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xU8lA6FveCcxBHhS1yJErvy8elKbCL79pd1bNeuTNGg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aT0XYXRiNpX6ZgDAPRKznl4Pr/e0l2Fq1e56/EneON7BIDip9zMmjugArTzJ+mxzXVHfhrApRBpp4USYDiY6379rmQ4RYWJYZovKnn1NMWPixVw1KPVMRMl0rKmS8hd3dasxahJwOaIJ+MtuRzKmDUkHLxnGWAqwpnesaG51LfM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=FO8DlWdH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="FO8DlWdH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=wlh8TQENPeCYbTiQf0d9bZH4utQ+NyqyA5rQwHDtMqQ=; b=FO8DlWdHOopyqPulTAnvX5Y0nc E06J1mwbvsRBJeXYQHdy7fTgEY23XcJOhXnBqMRc2j+Vw2h0H3ZAWwes0u/jD11qeSXAkPhzQ7AVw mx7GCCM0R8lZRkx00QIPwaMHD3Jsa1xpuoyGBbdg75ANQhkwBvsojBP3ki0nn08UdeC0=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ugRVx-0037OV-Rw; Mon, 28 Jul 2025 19:19:53 +0200 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 19:19:53 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: Heiner Kallweit , Alexandre Torgue , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, Maxime Coquelin , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 7/7] net: stmmac: explain the phylink_speed_down() call in stmmac_release() Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 04:46:02PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > The call to phylink_speed_down() looks odd on the face of it. Add a > comment to explain why this call is there. > > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn Andrew