Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] dpll: add frequency monitoring callback ops

[Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>]

On 01/04/2026 10:12, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> Add new callback operations for a dpll device:
> - freq_monitor_get(..) - to obtain current state of frequency monitor
>    feature from dpll device,
> - freq_monitor_set(..) - to allow feature configuration.
> 
> Add new callback operation for a dpll pin:
> - measured_freq_get(..) - to obtain the measured frequency in mHz.
> 
> Obtain the feature state value using the get callback and provide it to
> the user if the device driver implements callbacks. The measured_freq_get
> pin callback is only invoked when the frequency monitor is enabled.
> The freq_monitor_get device callback is required when measured_freq_get
> is provided by the driver.
> 
> Execute the set callback upon user requests.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes v2 -> v3:
> - Made freq_monitor_get required when measured_freq_get is present (Jakub)
> 
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> - Renamed actual-frequency to measured-frequency (Vadim)
> ---
>   drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/dpll.h        | 10 ++++
>   2 files changed, 102 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> index 83cbd64abf5a4..576d0cd074bd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,26 @@ dpll_msg_add_phase_offset_monitor(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int
> +dpll_msg_add_freq_monitor(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
> +			  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	const struct dpll_device_ops *ops = dpll_device_ops(dpll);
> +	enum dpll_feature_state state;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (ops->freq_monitor_set && ops->freq_monitor_get) {
> +		ret = ops->freq_monitor_get(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll),
> +					    &state, extack);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +		if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_FREQUENCY_MONITOR, state))
> +			return -EMSGSIZE;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static int
>   dpll_msg_add_phase_offset_avg_factor(struct sk_buff *msg,
>   				     struct dpll_device *dpll,
> @@ -400,6 +420,40 @@ static int dpll_msg_add_ffo(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>   			    ffo);
>   }
>   
> +static int dpll_msg_add_measured_freq(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
> +				      struct dpll_pin_ref *ref,
> +				      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	const struct dpll_device_ops *dev_ops = dpll_device_ops(ref->dpll);
> +	const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops = dpll_pin_ops(ref);
> +	struct dpll_device *dpll = ref->dpll;
> +	enum dpll_feature_state state;
> +	u64 measured_freq;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!ops->measured_freq_get)
> +		return 0;
> +	if (WARN_ON(!dev_ops->freq_monitor_get))
> +		return -EINVAL;

I think pin registration function has to be adjusted to not allow
measured_freq_get() callback if device doesn't have freq_monitor_get()
callback (or both freq_monitor_{s,g}et). Then this defensive part can
be completely removed.

> +	ret = dev_ops->freq_monitor_get(dpll, dpll_priv(dpll),