From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>, Feng Yang <yangfeng59949@163.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, posk@google.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: test_run: Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 17:12:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce000648-6f4b-405a-9403-0e4570e7b6bc@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc7b7d2a-9f7e-41ba-9010-dfbf592a0bbd@linux.dev>
On 3/4/26 2:33 AM, Leon Hwang wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
>> index 178c4738e63b..565fe8cbcdc9 100644
>> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
>> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
>> @@ -1156,6 +1156,20 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
>> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_COMPLETE;
>> }
>>
>> + if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT) {
>> + if (ipv6_bpf_stub) {
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>> + dst_hold(&net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry->dst);
>> + skb_dst_set(skb, &net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry->dst);
>> +#endif
>> + } else {
>> + /* For CONFIG_IPV6=n, ipv6_bpf_stub is NULL */
>> + pr_warn_once("Please test this program with the IPv6 module enabled\n");
>> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
> NIT: it would be more readable to handle the error path first.
>
> if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT) {
> if (!ipv6_bpf_stub) {
> pr_warn_once("...");
> ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> goto out;
> }
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> dst_hold();
> skb_dst_set();
> #endif
I have adapted this change and applied. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-04 9:44 [PATCH v10 bpf-next 0/2] Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap Feng Yang
2026-03-04 9:44 ` [PATCH v10 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: test_run: " Feng Yang
2026-03-04 10:30 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-04 10:33 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-05 1:12 ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2026-03-04 9:44 ` [PATCH v10 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for the invocation of bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap Feng Yang
2026-03-04 10:33 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-05 1:11 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-05 1:34 ` Leon Hwang
2026-03-05 1:10 ` [PATCH v10 bpf-next 0/2] Fix the null pointer dereference issue in bpf_lwt_xmit_push_encap patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce000648-6f4b-405a-9403-0e4570e7b6bc@linux.dev \
--to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=posk@google.com \
--cc=yangfeng59949@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox