From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: diag: Tell user if support for destroying TCP sockets is not enabled Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 19:11:58 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1463442791-2399-1-git-send-email-dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Lorenzo Colitti Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com ([209.85.213.171]:37327 "EHLO mail-ig0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752328AbcEQBMB (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2016 21:12:01 -0400 Received: by mail-ig0-f171.google.com with SMTP id s8so2120632ign.0 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:12:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 5/16/16 6:49 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:53 AM, David Ahern wrote: >> +#else >> +static int tcp_diag_destroy(struct sk_buff *in_skb, >> + const struct inet_diag_req_v2 *req) >> +{ >> + return -EOPNOTSUPP; >> +} >> #endif > > I don't understand why you need this. inet_diag_cmd_exact already > returns EOPNOTSUPP if tcp_diag_handler.destroy is NULL: > > else if (cmd == SOCK_DIAG_BY_FAMILY) > err = handler->dump_one(in_skb, nlh, req); > else if (cmd == SOCK_DESTROY && handler->destroy) > err = handler->destroy(in_skb, req); > else > err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > > Is this not working for some reason? > hmmm.... kernel patch is not needed. Suppression was happening in ss.