netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: [PATCH net v2 0/2] tcp: fix handling of stale syncookies timestamps
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 01:58:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1575503545.git.gnault@redhat.com> (raw)

The synflood timestamps (->ts_recent_stamp and ->synq_overflow_ts) are
only refreshed when the syncookie protection triggers. Therefore, their
value can become very far apart from jiffies if no synflood happens for
a long time.

If jiffies grows too much and wraps while the synflood timestamp isn't
refreshed, then time_after32() might consider the later to be in the
future. This can trick tcp_synq_no_recent_overflow() into returning
erroneous values and rejecting valid ACKs.

Patch 1 handles the case of ACKs using legitimate syncookies.
Patch 2 handles the case of stray ACKs.

Changes from v1:
  - Initialising timestamps at socket creation time is not enough
    because jiffies wraps in 24 days with HZ=1000 (Eric Dumazet).
    Handle stale timestamps in tcp_synq_overflow() and
    tcp_synq_no_recent_overflow() instead.
  - Rework commit description.
  - Add a second patch to handle the case of stray ACKs.

Guillaume Nault (2):
  tcp: fix rejected syncookies due to stale timestamps
  tcp: tighten acceptance of ACKs not matching a child socket

 include/net/tcp.h | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
@DaveM, I'm sending both patches in one series as they logically fit
together, although patch 2 is arguably a performance optimisation. I
can drop it from the series and repost it when net-next reopens if
you prefer. Although that'd make the link between the two less obvious.


             reply	other threads:[~2019-12-05  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-05  0:58 Guillaume Nault [this message]
2019-12-05  0:59 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] tcp: fix rejected syncookies due to stale timestamps Guillaume Nault
2019-12-05  0:59 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] tcp: tighten acceptance of ACKs not matching a child socket Guillaume Nault
2019-12-05  3:08   ` Eric Dumazet
2019-12-05 18:00     ` Guillaume Nault
2019-12-05 18:14       ` Eric Dumazet
2019-12-05 19:22         ` Guillaume Nault
2019-12-05 19:30           ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1575503545.git.gnault@redhat.com \
    --to=gnault@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).