netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/3] UDP sock_wfree optimisations
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:58:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1650891417.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)

The series is not UDP specific but that the main beneficiary. 2/3 saves one
atomic in sock_wfree() and on top 3/3 removes an extra barrier.
Tested with UDP over dummy netdev, 2038491 -> 2099071 req/s (or around +3%).

note: in regards to 1/3, there is a "Should agree with poll..." comment
that I don't completely get, and there is no git history to explain it.
Though I can't see how it could rely on having the second check without
racing with tasks woken by wake_up*().

The series was split from a larger patchset, see
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1648981570.git.asml.silence@gmail.com/

Pavel Begunkov (3):
  sock: dedup sock_def_write_space wmem_alloc checks
  sock: optimise UDP sock_wfree() refcounting
  sock: optimise sock_def_write_space barriers

 net/core/sock.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.36.0


             reply	other threads:[~2022-04-28 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-28 10:58 Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2022-04-28 10:58 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] sock: dedup sock_def_write_space wmem_alloc checks Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:58 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] sock: optimise UDP sock_wfree() refcounting Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:58 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] sock: optimise sock_def_write_space barriers Pavel Begunkov
2022-05-01 12:20 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] UDP sock_wfree optimisations patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1650891417.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).