netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ordering tests for unified bridge model
@ 2022-08-17 15:28 Petr Machata
  2022-08-17 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1D bridge Petr Machata
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Petr Machata @ 2022-08-17 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
	netdev
  Cc: Ido Schimmel, Amit Cohen, Shuah Khan, Petr Machata, mlxsw

Amit Cohen writes:

Commit 798661c73672 ("Merge branch 'mlxsw-unified-bridge-conversion-part-6'")
converted mlxsw driver to use unified bridge model. In the legacy model,
when a RIF was created / destroyed, it was firmware's responsibility to
update it in the relevant FID classification records. In the unified bridge
model, this responsibility moved to software.

This set adds tests to check the order of configuration for the following
classifications:
1. {Port, VID} -> FID
2. VID -> FID
3. VNI -> FID (after decapsulation)

In addition, in the legacy model, software is responsible to update a
table which is used to determine the packet's egress VID. Add a test to
check that the order of configuration does not impact switch behavior.

See more details in the commit messages.

Note that the tests supposed to pass also using the legacy model, they
are added now as with the new model they test the driver and not the
firmware.

Patch set overview:
Patch #1 adds test for {Port, VID} -> FID
Patch #2 adds test for VID -> FID
Patch #3 adds test for VNI -> FID
Patch #4 adds test for egress VID classification

Amit Cohen (4):
  selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1D bridge
  selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1Q bridge
  selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for VXLAN
  selftests: mlxsw: Add egress VID classification test

 .../net/mlxsw/egress_vid_classification.sh    | 273 +++++++++++++++
 .../drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh  | 264 +++++++++++++++
 .../drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1q.sh  | 264 +++++++++++++++
 .../net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_vxlan.sh       | 311 ++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 1112 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/egress_vid_classification.sh
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1q.sh
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_vxlan.sh

-- 
2.35.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 1/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1D bridge
  2022-08-17 15:28 [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ordering tests for unified bridge model Petr Machata
@ 2022-08-17 15:28 ` Petr Machata
  2022-08-17 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1Q bridge Petr Machata
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Petr Machata @ 2022-08-17 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
	netdev
  Cc: Ido Schimmel, Amit Cohen, Shuah Khan, Petr Machata, mlxsw

From: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>

Before layer 2 forwarding, the device classifies an incoming packet to a
FID. After classification, the FID is known, but also all the attributes of
the FID, such as the router interface (RIF) via which a packet that needs
to be routed will ingress the router block.

For VLAN-unaware bridges (802.1D), the FID classification is done according
to {Port, VID}. When a RIF is added on top of a FID, all the existing
{Port, VID}->FID mappings should be updated by the software with the new
RIF. In addition, when a new mapping is added for FID which already has a
RIF, the correct RIF should be used for it.

Add a test to verify that packets can be routed after {Port, VID}->FID
classification, regardless of the order of the configuration.

 # ./ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh
 TEST: Add RIF for existing {port, VID}->FID mapping                 [ OK ]
 TEST: Add {port, VID}->FID mapping for FID with a RIF               [ OK ]

Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
---
 .../drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh  | 264 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 264 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..df2b09966886
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+# Test routing over bridge and verify that the order of configuration does not
+# impact switch behavior. Verify that RIF is added correctly for existing
+# mappings and that new mappings use the correct RIF.
+
+# +-------------------+                   +--------------------+
+# | H1                |                   | H2                 |
+# |                   |                   |                    |
+# |         $h1.10 +  |                   |  + $h2.10          |
+# |   192.0.2.1/28 |  |                   |  | 192.0.2.3/28    |
+# |                |  |                   |  |                 |
+# |            $h1 +  |                   |  + $h2             |
+# +----------------|--+                   +--|-----------------+
+#                  |                         |
+# +----------------|-------------------------|-----------------+
+# | SW             |                         |                 |
+# | +--------------|-------------------------|---------------+ |
+# | |        $swp1 +                         + $swp2         | |
+# | |              |                         |               | |
+# | |     $swp1.10 +                         + $swp2.10      | |
+# | |                                                        | |
+# | |                           br0                          | |
+# | |                       192.0.2.2/28                     | |
+# | +--------------------------------------------------------+ |
+# |                                                            |
+# |      $swp3.10 +                                            |
+# | 192.0.2.17/28 |                                            |
+# |               |                                            |
+# |         $swp3 +                                            |
+# +---------------|--------------------------------------------+
+#                 |
+# +---------------|--+
+# |           $h3 +  |
+# |               |  |
+# |        $h3.10 +  |
+# | 192.0.2.18/28    |
+# |                  |
+# | H3               |
+# +------------------+
+
+lib_dir=$(dirname $0)/../../../net/forwarding
+
+ALL_TESTS="
+	port_vid_map_rif
+	rif_port_vid_map
+"
+
+NUM_NETIFS=6
+source $lib_dir/lib.sh
+source $lib_dir/tc_common.sh
+source $lib_dir/devlink_lib.sh
+
+h1_create()
+{
+	simple_if_init $h1
+	vlan_create $h1 10 v$h1 192.0.2.1/28
+
+	ip route add 192.0.2.16/28 vrf v$h1 nexthop via 192.0.2.2
+}
+
+h1_destroy()
+{
+	ip route del 192.0.2.16/28 vrf v$h1 nexthop via 192.0.2.2
+
+	vlan_destroy $h1 10
+	simple_if_fini $h1
+}
+
+h2_create()
+{
+	simple_if_init $h2
+	vlan_create $h2 10 v$h2 192.0.2.3/28
+}
+
+h2_destroy()
+{
+	vlan_destroy $h2 10
+	simple_if_fini $h2
+}
+
+h3_create()
+{
+	simple_if_init $h3
+	vlan_create $h3 10 v$h3 192.0.2.18/28
+
+	ip route add 192.0.2.0/28 vrf v$h3 nexthop via 192.0.2.17
+}
+
+h3_destroy()
+{
+	ip route del 192.0.2.0/28 vrf v$h3 nexthop via 192.0.2.17
+
+	vlan_destroy $h3 10
+	simple_if_fini $h3
+}
+
+switch_create()
+{
+	ip link set dev $swp1 up
+
+	ip link add dev br0 type bridge mcast_snooping 0
+
+	# By default, a link-local address is generated when netdevice becomes
+	# up. Adding an address to the bridge will cause creating a RIF for it.
+	# Prevent generating link-local address to be able to control when the
+	# RIF is added.
+	sysctl_set net.ipv6.conf.br0.addr_gen_mode 1
+	ip link set dev br0 up
+
+	ip link set dev $swp2 up
+	vlan_create $swp2 10
+	ip link set dev $swp2.10 master br0
+
+	ip link set dev $swp3 up
+	vlan_create $swp3 10 "" 192.0.2.17/28
+	tc qdisc add dev $swp3 clsact
+
+	# Replace neighbor to avoid 1 packet which is forwarded in software due
+	# to "unresolved neigh".
+	ip neigh replace dev $swp3.10 192.0.2.18 lladdr $(mac_get $h3.10)
+}
+
+switch_destroy()
+{
+	tc qdisc del dev $swp3 clsact
+	vlan_destroy $swp3 10
+	ip link set dev $swp3 down
+
+	ip link set dev $swp2.10 nomaster
+	vlan_destroy $swp2 10
+	ip link set dev $swp2 down
+
+	ip link set dev br0 down
+	sysctl_restore net.ipv6.conf.br0.addr_gen_mode
+	ip link del dev br0
+
+	ip link set dev $swp1 down
+}
+
+setup_prepare()
+{
+	h1=${NETIFS[p1]}
+	swp1=${NETIFS[p2]}
+
+	swp2=${NETIFS[p3]}
+	h2=${NETIFS[p4]}
+
+	swp3=${NETIFS[p5]}
+	h3=${NETIFS[p6]}
+
+	vrf_prepare
+	forwarding_enable
+
+	h1_create
+	h2_create
+	h3_create
+
+	switch_create
+}
+
+cleanup()
+{
+	pre_cleanup
+
+	switch_destroy
+
+	h3_destroy
+	h2_destroy
+	h1_destroy
+
+	forwarding_restore
+	vrf_cleanup
+}
+
+bridge_rif_add()
+{
+	rifs_occ_t0=$(devlink_resource_occ_get rifs)
+	__addr_add_del br0 add 192.0.2.2/28
+	rifs_occ_t1=$(devlink_resource_occ_get rifs)
+
+	expected_rifs=$((rifs_occ_t0 + 1))
+
+	[[ $expected_rifs -eq $rifs_occ_t1 ]]
+	check_err $? "Expected $expected_rifs RIFs, $rifs_occ_t1 are used"
+
+	sleep 1
+}
+
+bridge_rif_del()
+{
+	__addr_add_del br0 del 192.0.2.2/28
+}
+
+port_vid_map_rif()
+{
+	RET=0
+
+	# First add {port, VID}->FID for $swp1.10, then add a RIF and verify
+	# that packets can be routed via the existing mapping.
+	vlan_create $swp1 10
+	ip link set dev $swp1.10 master br0
+	bridge_rif_add
+
+	# The hardware matches on the first ethertype which is not VLAN,
+	# so the protocol should be IP.
+	tc filter add dev $swp3 egress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \
+		flower skip_sw dst_ip 192.0.2.18 action pass
+
+	ping_do $h1.10 192.0.2.18
+	check_err $? "Ping failed"
+
+	tc_check_at_least_x_packets "dev $swp3 egress" 101 10
+	check_err $? "Packets were not routed in hardware"
+
+	log_test "Add RIF for existing {port, VID}->FID mapping"
+
+	tc filter del dev $swp3 egress
+
+	bridge_rif_del
+	ip link set dev $swp1.10 nomaster
+	vlan_destroy $swp1 10
+}
+
+rif_port_vid_map()
+{
+	RET=0
+
+	# First add an address to the bridge, which will create a RIF on top of
+	# it, then add a new {port, VID}->FID mapping and verify that packets
+	# can be routed via the new mapping.
+	bridge_rif_add
+	vlan_create $swp1 10
+	ip link set dev $swp1.10 master br0
+
+	# The hardware matches on the first ethertype which is not VLAN,
+	# so the protocol should be IP.
+	tc filter add dev $swp3 egress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \
+		flower skip_sw dst_ip 192.0.2.18 action pass
+
+	ping_do $h1.10 192.0.2.18
+	check_err $? "Ping failed"
+
+	tc_check_at_least_x_packets "dev $swp3 egress" 101 10
+	check_err $? "Packets were not routed in hardware"
+
+	log_test "Add {port, VID}->FID mapping for FID with a RIF"
+
+	tc filter del dev $swp3 egress
+
+	ip link set dev $swp1.10 nomaster
+	vlan_destroy $swp1 10
+	bridge_rif_del
+}
+
+trap cleanup EXIT
+
+setup_prepare
+setup_wait
+
+tests_run
+
+exit $EXIT_STATUS
-- 
2.35.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 2/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1Q bridge
  2022-08-17 15:28 [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ordering tests for unified bridge model Petr Machata
  2022-08-17 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1D bridge Petr Machata
@ 2022-08-17 15:28 ` Petr Machata
  2022-08-17 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for VXLAN Petr Machata
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Petr Machata @ 2022-08-17 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
	netdev
  Cc: Ido Schimmel, Amit Cohen, Shuah Khan, Petr Machata, mlxsw

From: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>

Before layer 2 forwarding, the device classifies an incoming packet to a
FID. After classification, the FID is known, but also all the attributes of
the FID, such as the router interface (RIF) via which a packet that needs
to be routed will ingress the router block.

For VLAN-aware bridges (802.1Q), the FID classification is done according
to VID. When a RIF is added on top of a FID, the existing VID->FID mapping
should be updated by the software with the new RIF.

We never map multiple VLANs to the same FID using VID->FID, so we cannot
create VID->FID for FID which already has a RIF using 802.1Q. Anyway,
verify that packets can be routed via port which is added after the FID
already has a RIF.

Add a test to verify that packets can be routed after VID->FID
classification, regardless of the order of the configuration.

 # ./ingress_rif_conf_1q.sh
 TEST: Add RIF for existing VID->FID mapping                         [ OK ]
 TEST: Add port to VID->FID mapping for FID with a RIF               [ OK ]

Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
---
 .../drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1q.sh  | 264 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 264 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1q.sh

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1q.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1q.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..577293bab88b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_1q.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+# Test routing over bridge and verify that the order of configuration does not
+# impact switch behavior. Verify that RIF is added correctly for existing
+# mapping and that packets can be routed via port which is added after the FID
+# already has a RIF.
+
+# +-------------------+                   +--------------------+
+# | H1                |                   | H2                 |
+# |                   |                   |                    |
+# |         $h1.10 +  |                   |  + $h2.10          |
+# |   192.0.2.1/28 |  |                   |  | 192.0.2.3/28    |
+# |                |  |                   |  |                 |
+# |            $h1 +  |                   |  + $h2             |
+# +----------------|--+                   +--|-----------------+
+#                  |                         |
+# +----------------|-------------------------|-----------------+
+# | SW             |                         |                 |
+# | +--------------|-------------------------|---------------+ |
+# | |        $swp1 +                         + $swp2         | |
+# | |                                                        | |
+# | |                           br0                          | |
+# | +--------------------------------------------------------+ |
+# |                              |                             |
+# |                           br0.10                           |
+# |                        192.0.2.2/28                        |
+# |                                                            |
+# |                                                            |
+# |          $swp3 +                                           |
+# |  192.0.2.17/28 |                                           |
+# +----------------|-------------------------------------------+
+#                  |
+# +----------------|--+
+# |            $h3 +  |
+# |  192.0.2.18/28    |
+# |                   |
+# | H3                |
+# +-------------------+
+
+lib_dir=$(dirname $0)/../../../net/forwarding
+
+ALL_TESTS="
+	vid_map_rif
+	rif_vid_map
+"
+
+NUM_NETIFS=6
+source $lib_dir/lib.sh
+source $lib_dir/tc_common.sh
+source $lib_dir/devlink_lib.sh
+
+h1_create()
+{
+	simple_if_init $h1
+	vlan_create $h1 10 v$h1 192.0.2.1/28
+
+	ip route add 192.0.2.16/28 vrf v$h1 nexthop via 192.0.2.2
+}
+
+h1_destroy()
+{
+	ip route del 192.0.2.16/28 vrf v$h1 nexthop via 192.0.2.2
+
+	vlan_destroy $h1 10
+	simple_if_fini $h1
+}
+
+h2_create()
+{
+	simple_if_init $h2
+	vlan_create $h2 10 v$h2 192.0.2.3/28
+}
+
+h2_destroy()
+{
+	vlan_destroy $h2 10
+	simple_if_fini $h2
+}
+
+h3_create()
+{
+	simple_if_init $h3 192.0.2.18/28
+	ip route add 192.0.2.0/28 vrf v$h3 nexthop via 192.0.2.17
+}
+
+h3_destroy()
+{
+	ip route del 192.0.2.0/28 vrf v$h3 nexthop via 192.0.2.17
+	simple_if_fini $h3 192.0.2.18/28
+}
+
+switch_create()
+{
+	ip link set dev $swp1 up
+
+	ip link add dev br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 mcast_snooping 0
+
+	# By default, a link-local address is generated when netdevice becomes
+	# up. Adding an address to the bridge will cause creating a RIF for it.
+	# Prevent generating link-local address to be able to control when the
+	# RIF is added.
+	sysctl_set net.ipv6.conf.br0.addr_gen_mode 1
+	ip link set dev br0 up
+
+	ip link set dev $swp2 up
+	ip link set dev $swp2 master br0
+	bridge vlan add vid 10 dev $swp2
+
+	ip link set dev $swp3 up
+	__addr_add_del $swp3 add 192.0.2.17/28
+	tc qdisc add dev $swp3 clsact
+
+	# Replace neighbor to avoid 1 packet which is forwarded in software due
+	# to "unresolved neigh".
+	ip neigh replace dev $swp3 192.0.2.18 lladdr $(mac_get $h3)
+}
+
+switch_destroy()
+{
+	tc qdisc del dev $swp3 clsact
+	__addr_add_del $swp3 del 192.0.2.17/28
+	ip link set dev $swp3 down
+
+	bridge vlan del vid 10 dev $swp2
+	ip link set dev $swp2 nomaster
+	ip link set dev $swp2 down
+
+	ip link set dev br0 down
+	sysctl_restore net.ipv6.conf.br0.addr_gen_mode
+	ip link del dev br0
+
+	ip link set dev $swp1 down
+}
+
+setup_prepare()
+{
+	h1=${NETIFS[p1]}
+	swp1=${NETIFS[p2]}
+
+	swp2=${NETIFS[p3]}
+	h2=${NETIFS[p4]}
+
+	swp3=${NETIFS[p5]}
+	h3=${NETIFS[p6]}
+
+	vrf_prepare
+	forwarding_enable
+
+	h1_create
+	h2_create
+	h3_create
+
+	switch_create
+}
+
+cleanup()
+{
+	pre_cleanup
+
+	switch_destroy
+
+	h3_destroy
+	h2_destroy
+	h1_destroy
+
+	forwarding_restore
+	vrf_cleanup
+}
+
+bridge_rif_add()
+{
+	rifs_occ_t0=$(devlink_resource_occ_get rifs)
+	vlan_create br0 10 "" 192.0.2.2/28
+	rifs_occ_t1=$(devlink_resource_occ_get rifs)
+
+	expected_rifs=$((rifs_occ_t0 + 1))
+
+	[[ $expected_rifs -eq $rifs_occ_t1 ]]
+	check_err $? "Expected $expected_rifs RIFs, $rifs_occ_t1 are used"
+
+	sleep 1
+}
+
+bridge_rif_del()
+{
+	vlan_destroy br0 10
+}
+
+vid_map_rif()
+{
+	RET=0
+
+	# First add VID->FID for vlan 10, then add a RIF and verify that
+	# packets can be routed via the existing mapping.
+	bridge vlan add vid 10 dev br0 self
+	ip link set dev $swp1 master br0
+	bridge vlan add vid 10 dev $swp1
+
+	bridge_rif_add
+
+	tc filter add dev $swp3 egress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \
+		flower skip_sw dst_ip 192.0.2.18 action pass
+
+	ping_do $h1.10 192.0.2.18
+	check_err $? "Ping failed"
+
+	tc_check_at_least_x_packets "dev $swp3 egress" 101 10
+	check_err $? "Packets were not routed in hardware"
+
+	log_test "Add RIF for existing VID->FID mapping"
+
+	tc filter del dev $swp3 egress
+
+	bridge_rif_del
+
+	bridge vlan del vid 10 dev $swp1
+	ip link set dev $swp1 nomaster
+	bridge vlan del vid 10 dev br0 self
+}
+
+rif_vid_map()
+{
+	RET=0
+
+	# Using 802.1Q, there is only one VID->FID map for each VID. That means
+	# that we cannot really check adding a new map for existing FID with a
+	# RIF. Verify that packets can be routed via port which is added after
+	# the FID already has a RIF, although in practice there is no new
+	# mapping in the hardware.
+	bridge vlan add vid 10 dev br0 self
+	bridge_rif_add
+
+	ip link set dev $swp1 master br0
+	bridge vlan add vid 10 dev $swp1
+
+	tc filter add dev $swp3 egress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \
+		flower skip_sw dst_ip 192.0.2.18 action pass
+
+	ping_do $h1.10 192.0.2.18
+	check_err $? "Ping failed"
+
+	tc_check_at_least_x_packets "dev $swp3 egress" 101 10
+	check_err $? "Packets were not routed in hardware"
+
+	log_test "Add port to VID->FID mapping for FID with a RIF"
+
+	tc filter del dev $swp3 egress
+
+	bridge vlan del vid 10 dev $swp1
+	ip link set dev $swp1 nomaster
+
+	bridge_rif_del
+	bridge vlan del vid 10 dev br0 self
+}
+
+trap cleanup EXIT
+
+setup_prepare
+setup_wait
+
+tests_run
+
+exit $EXIT_STATUS
-- 
2.35.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 3/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for VXLAN
  2022-08-17 15:28 [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ordering tests for unified bridge model Petr Machata
  2022-08-17 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1D bridge Petr Machata
  2022-08-17 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1Q bridge Petr Machata
@ 2022-08-17 15:28 ` Petr Machata
  2022-08-17 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add egress VID classification test Petr Machata
  2022-08-19  4:00 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ordering tests for unified bridge model patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Petr Machata @ 2022-08-17 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
	netdev
  Cc: Ido Schimmel, Amit Cohen, Shuah Khan, Petr Machata, mlxsw

From: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>

Before layer 2 forwarding, the device classifies an incoming packet to a
FID. After classification, the FID is known, but also all the attributes of
the FID, such as the router interface (RIF) via which a packet that needs
to be routed will ingress the router block.

For VXLAN decapsulation, the FID classification is done according to the
VNI. When a RIF is added on top of a FID, the existing VNI->FID mapping
should be updated by the software with the new RIF. In addition, when a new
mapping is added for FID which already has a RIF, the correct RIF should
be used for it.

Add a test to verify that packets can be routed after decapsulation which
is done after VNI->FID classification, regardless of the order of the
configuration.

 # ./ingress_rif_conf_vxlan.sh
 TEST: Add RIF for existing VNI->FID mapping                         [ OK ]
 TEST: Add VNI->FID mapping for FID with a RIF                       [ OK ]

Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
---
 .../net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_vxlan.sh       | 311 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 311 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_vxlan.sh

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_vxlan.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_vxlan.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..90450216a10d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/ingress_rif_conf_vxlan.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,311 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+# Test routing after VXLAN decapsulation and verify that the order of
+# configuration does not impact switch behavior. Verify that RIF is added
+# correctly for existing mapping and that new mapping uses the correct RIF.
+
+# +---------------------------+
+# |                        H1 |
+# |    + $h1                  |
+# |    | 192.0.2.1/28         |
+# +----|----------------------+
+#      |
+# +----|----------------------------------------------------------------------+
+# | SW |                                                                      |
+# | +--|--------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
+# | |  + $swp1                         br1                                  | |
+# | |     vid 10 pvid untagged                                              | |
+# | |                                                                       | |
+# | |                                                                       | |
+# | |                                            + vx4001                   | |
+# | |                                              local 192.0.2.17         | |
+# | |                                              remote 192.0.2.18        | |
+# | |                                              id 104001                | |
+# | |                                              dstport $VXPORT          | |
+# | |                                              vid 4001 pvid untagged   | |
+# | |                                                                       | |
+# | +----------------------------------+------------------------------------+ |
+# |                                    |                                      |
+# | +----------------------------------|------------------------------------+ |
+# | |                                  |                                    | |
+# | |  +-------------------------------+---------------------------------+  | |
+# | |  |                                                                 |  | |
+# | |  + vlan10                                                 vlan4001 +  | |
+# | |    192.0.2.2/28                                                       | |
+# | |                                                                       | |
+# | |                               vrf-green                               | |
+# | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
+# |                                                                           |
+# |    + $rp1                                       +lo                       |
+# |    | 198.51.100.1/24                             192.0.2.17/32            |
+# +----|----------------------------------------------------------------------+
+#      |
+# +----|--------------------------------------------------------+
+# |    |                                             v$rp2      |
+# |    + $rp2                                                   |
+# |      198.51.100.2/24                                        |
+# |                                                             |
+# +-------------------------------------------------------------+
+
+lib_dir=$(dirname $0)/../../../net/forwarding
+
+ALL_TESTS="
+	vni_fid_map_rif
+	rif_vni_fid_map
+"
+
+NUM_NETIFS=4
+source $lib_dir/lib.sh
+source $lib_dir/tc_common.sh
+source $lib_dir/devlink_lib.sh
+
+: ${VXPORT:=4789}
+export VXPORT
+
+h1_create()
+{
+	simple_if_init $h1 192.0.2.1/28
+}
+
+h1_destroy()
+{
+	simple_if_fini $h1 192.0.2.1/28
+}
+
+switch_create()
+{
+	ip link add name br1 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 vlan_default_pvid 0 \
+		mcast_snooping 0
+	# Make sure the bridge uses the MAC address of the local port and not
+	# that of the VxLAN's device.
+	ip link set dev br1 address $(mac_get $swp1)
+	ip link set dev br1 up
+
+	ip link set dev $rp1 up
+	ip address add dev $rp1 198.51.100.1/24
+
+	ip link set dev $swp1 master br1
+	ip link set dev $swp1 up
+	bridge vlan add vid 10 dev $swp1 pvid untagged
+
+	tc qdisc add dev $swp1 clsact
+
+	ip link add name vx4001 type vxlan id 104001 \
+		local 192.0.2.17 dstport $VXPORT \
+		nolearning noudpcsum tos inherit ttl 100
+	ip link set dev vx4001 up
+
+	ip link set dev vx4001 master br1
+
+	ip address add 192.0.2.17/32 dev lo
+
+	# Create SVIs.
+	vrf_create "vrf-green"
+	ip link set dev vrf-green up
+
+	ip link add link br1 name vlan10 up master vrf-green type vlan id 10
+
+	# Replace neighbor to avoid 1 packet which is forwarded in software due
+	# to "unresolved neigh".
+	ip neigh replace dev vlan10 192.0.2.1 lladdr $(mac_get $h1)
+
+	ip address add 192.0.2.2/28 dev vlan10
+
+	bridge vlan add vid 10 dev br1 self
+	bridge vlan add vid 4001 dev br1 self
+
+	sysctl_set net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter 0
+}
+
+switch_destroy()
+{
+	sysctl_restore net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter
+
+	bridge vlan del vid 4001 dev br1 self
+	bridge vlan del vid 10 dev br1 self
+
+	ip link del dev vlan10
+
+	vrf_destroy "vrf-green"
+
+	ip address del 192.0.2.17/32 dev lo
+
+	tc qdisc del dev $swp1 clsact
+
+	bridge vlan del vid 10 dev $swp1
+	ip link set dev $swp1 down
+	ip link set dev $swp1 nomaster
+
+	ip link set dev vx4001 nomaster
+
+	ip link set dev vx4001 down
+	ip link del dev vx4001
+
+	ip address del dev $rp1 198.51.100.1/24
+	ip link set dev $rp1 down
+
+	ip link set dev br1 down
+	ip link del dev br1
+}
+
+vrp2_create()
+{
+	simple_if_init $rp2 198.51.100.2/24
+
+	ip route add 192.0.2.17/32 vrf v$rp2 nexthop via 198.51.100.1
+}
+
+vrp2_destroy()
+{
+	ip route del 192.0.2.17/32 vrf v$rp2 nexthop via 198.51.100.1
+
+	simple_if_fini $rp2 198.51.100.2/24
+}
+
+setup_prepare()
+{
+	h1=${NETIFS[p1]}
+	swp1=${NETIFS[p2]}
+
+	rp1=${NETIFS[p3]}
+	rp2=${NETIFS[p4]}
+
+	vrf_prepare
+	forwarding_enable
+
+	h1_create
+	switch_create
+
+	vrp2_create
+}
+
+cleanup()
+{
+	pre_cleanup
+
+	vrp2_destroy
+
+	switch_destroy
+	h1_destroy
+
+	forwarding_restore
+	vrf_cleanup
+}
+
+payload_get()
+{
+	local dest_mac=$(mac_get vlan4001)
+	local src_mac=$(mac_get $rp1)
+
+	p=$(:
+		)"08:"$(                      : VXLAN flags
+		)"00:00:00:"$(                : VXLAN reserved
+		)"01:96:41:"$(                : VXLAN VNI : 104001
+		)"00:"$(                      : VXLAN reserved
+		)"$dest_mac:"$(               : ETH daddr
+		)"$src_mac:"$(                : ETH saddr
+		)"08:00:"$(                   : ETH type
+		)"45:"$(                      : IP version + IHL
+		)"00:"$(                      : IP TOS
+		)"00:54:"$(                   : IP total length
+		)"3f:49:"$(                   : IP identification
+		)"00:00:"$(                   : IP flags + frag off
+		)"3f:"$(                      : IP TTL
+		)"01:"$(                      : IP proto
+		)"50:21:"$(                   : IP header csum
+		)"c6:33:64:0a:"$(             : IP saddr: 198.51.100.10
+		)"c0:00:02:01:"$(             : IP daddr: 192.0.2.1
+	)
+	echo $p
+}
+
+vlan_rif_add()
+{
+	rifs_occ_t0=$(devlink_resource_occ_get rifs)
+
+	ip link add link br1 name vlan4001 up master vrf-green \
+		type vlan id 4001
+
+	rifs_occ_t1=$(devlink_resource_occ_get rifs)
+	expected_rifs=$((rifs_occ_t0 + 1))
+
+	[[ $expected_rifs -eq $rifs_occ_t1 ]]
+	check_err $? "Expected $expected_rifs RIFs, $rifs_occ_t1 are used"
+}
+
+vlan_rif_del()
+{
+	ip link del dev vlan4001
+}
+
+vni_fid_map_rif()
+{
+	local rp1_mac=$(mac_get $rp1)
+
+	RET=0
+
+	# First add VNI->FID mapping to the FID of VLAN 4001
+	bridge vlan add vid 4001 dev vx4001 pvid untagged
+
+	# Add a RIF to the FID with VNI->FID mapping
+	vlan_rif_add
+
+	tc filter add dev $swp1 egress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \
+		flower skip_sw dst_ip 192.0.2.1 action pass
+
+	payload=$(payload_get)
+	ip vrf exec v$rp2 $MZ $rp2 -c 10 -d 1msec -b $rp1_mac \
+		-B 192.0.2.17 -A 192.0.2.18 \
+		-t udp sp=12345,dp=$VXPORT,p=$payload -q
+
+	tc_check_at_least_x_packets "dev $swp1 egress" 101 10
+	check_err $? "Packets were not routed in hardware"
+
+	log_test "Add RIF for existing VNI->FID mapping"
+
+	tc filter del dev $swp1 egress
+
+	bridge vlan del vid 4001 dev vx4001 pvid untagged
+	vlan_rif_del
+}
+
+rif_vni_fid_map()
+{
+	local rp1_mac=$(mac_get $rp1)
+
+	RET=0
+
+	# First add a RIF to the FID of VLAN 4001
+	vlan_rif_add
+
+	# Add VNI->FID mapping to FID with a RIF
+	bridge vlan add vid 4001 dev vx4001 pvid untagged
+
+	tc filter add dev $swp1 egress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \
+		flower skip_sw dst_ip 192.0.2.1 action pass
+
+	payload=$(payload_get)
+	ip vrf exec v$rp2 $MZ $rp2 -c 10 -d 1msec -b $rp1_mac \
+		-B 192.0.2.17 -A 192.0.2.18 \
+		-t udp sp=12345,dp=$VXPORT,p=$payload -q
+
+	tc_check_at_least_x_packets "dev $swp1 egress" 101 10
+	check_err $? "Packets were not routed in hardware"
+
+	log_test "Add VNI->FID mapping for FID with a RIF"
+
+	tc filter del dev $swp1 egress
+
+	bridge vlan del vid 4001 dev vx4001 pvid untagged
+	vlan_rif_del
+}
+
+trap cleanup EXIT
+
+setup_prepare
+setup_wait
+
+tests_run
+
+exit $EXIT_STATUS
-- 
2.35.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next 4/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add egress VID classification test
  2022-08-17 15:28 [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ordering tests for unified bridge model Petr Machata
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-08-17 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for VXLAN Petr Machata
@ 2022-08-17 15:28 ` Petr Machata
  2022-08-19  4:00 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ordering tests for unified bridge model patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Petr Machata @ 2022-08-17 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
	netdev
  Cc: Ido Schimmel, Amit Cohen, Shuah Khan, Petr Machata, mlxsw

From: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>

After routing, the device always consults a table that determines the
packet's egress VID based on {egress RIF, egress local port}. In the
unified bridge model, it is up to software to maintain this table via
REIV register.

The table needs to be updated in the following flows:
1. When a RIF is set on a FID, for each FID's {Port, VID} mapping, a new
   {RIF, Port}->VID mapping should be created.
2. When a {Port, VID} is mapped to a FID and the FID already has a RIF,
   a new {RIF, Port}->VID mapping should be created.

Add a test to verify that packets get the correct VID after routing,
regardless of the order of the configuration.

 # ./egress_vid_classification.sh
 TEST: Add RIF for existing {port, VID}->FID mapping                 [ OK ]
 TEST: Add {port, VID}->FID mapping for FID with a RIF               [ OK ]

Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
---
 .../net/mlxsw/egress_vid_classification.sh    | 273 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 273 insertions(+)
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/egress_vid_classification.sh

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/egress_vid_classification.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/egress_vid_classification.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..0cf9e47e3209
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/egress_vid_classification.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+# Test VLAN classification after routing and verify that the order of
+# configuration does not impact switch behavior. Verify that {RIF, Port}->VID
+# mapping is added correctly for existing {Port, VID}->FID mapping and that
+# {RIF, Port}->VID mapping is added correctly for new {Port, VID}->FID mapping.
+
+# +-------------------+                   +--------------------+
+# | H1                |                   | H2                 |
+# |                   |                   |                    |
+# |         $h1.10 +  |                   |  + $h2.10          |
+# |   192.0.2.1/28 |  |                   |  | 192.0.2.3/28    |
+# |                |  |                   |  |                 |
+# |            $h1 +  |                   |  + $h2             |
+# +----------------|--+                   +--|-----------------+
+#                  |                         |
+# +----------------|-------------------------|-----------------+
+# | SW             |                         |                 |
+# | +--------------|-------------------------|---------------+ |
+# | |        $swp1 +                         + $swp2         | |
+# | |              |                         |               | |
+# | |     $swp1.10 +                         + $swp2.10      | |
+# | |                                                        | |
+# | |                           br0                          | |
+# | |                       192.0.2.2/28                     | |
+# | +--------------------------------------------------------+ |
+# |                                                            |
+# |      $swp3.20 +                                            |
+# | 192.0.2.17/28 |                                            |
+# |               |                                            |
+# |         $swp3 +                                            |
+# +---------------|--------------------------------------------+
+#                 |
+# +---------------|--+
+# |           $h3 +  |
+# |               |  |
+# |        $h3.20 +  |
+# | 192.0.2.18/28    |
+# |                  |
+# | H3               |
+# +------------------+
+
+lib_dir=$(dirname $0)/../../../net/forwarding
+
+ALL_TESTS="
+	port_vid_map_rif
+	rif_port_vid_map
+"
+
+NUM_NETIFS=6
+source $lib_dir/lib.sh
+source $lib_dir/tc_common.sh
+source $lib_dir/devlink_lib.sh
+
+h1_create()
+{
+	simple_if_init $h1
+	vlan_create $h1 10 v$h1 192.0.2.1/28
+
+	ip route add 192.0.2.16/28 vrf v$h1 nexthop via 192.0.2.2
+}
+
+h1_destroy()
+{
+	ip route del 192.0.2.16/28 vrf v$h1 nexthop via 192.0.2.2
+
+	vlan_destroy $h1 10
+	simple_if_fini $h1
+}
+
+h2_create()
+{
+	simple_if_init $h2
+	vlan_create $h2 10 v$h2 192.0.2.3/28
+}
+
+h2_destroy()
+{
+	vlan_destroy $h2 10
+	simple_if_fini $h2
+}
+
+h3_create()
+{
+	simple_if_init $h3
+	vlan_create $h3 20 v$h3 192.0.2.18/28
+
+	ip route add 192.0.2.0/28 vrf v$h3 nexthop via 192.0.2.17
+}
+
+h3_destroy()
+{
+	ip route del 192.0.2.0/28 vrf v$h3 nexthop via 192.0.2.17
+
+	vlan_destroy $h3 20
+	simple_if_fini $h3
+}
+
+switch_create()
+{
+	ip link set dev $swp1 up
+	tc qdisc add dev $swp1 clsact
+
+	ip link add dev br0 type bridge mcast_snooping 0
+
+	# By default, a link-local address is generated when netdevice becomes
+	# up. Adding an address to the bridge will cause creating a RIF for it.
+	# Prevent generating link-local address to be able to control when the
+	# RIF is added.
+	sysctl_set net.ipv6.conf.br0.addr_gen_mode 1
+	ip link set dev br0 up
+
+	ip link set dev $swp2 up
+	vlan_create $swp2 10
+	ip link set dev $swp2.10 master br0
+
+	ip link set dev $swp3 up
+	vlan_create $swp3 20 "" 192.0.2.17/28
+
+	# Replace neighbor to avoid 1 packet which is forwarded in software due
+	# to "unresolved neigh".
+	ip neigh replace dev $swp3.20 192.0.2.18 lladdr $(mac_get $h3.20)
+}
+
+switch_destroy()
+{
+	vlan_destroy $swp3 20
+	ip link set dev $swp3 down
+
+	ip link set dev $swp2.10 nomaster
+	vlan_destroy $swp2 10
+	ip link set dev $swp2 down
+
+	ip link set dev br0 down
+	sysctl_restore net.ipv6.conf.br0.addr_gen_mode
+	ip link del dev br0
+
+	tc qdisc del dev $swp1 clsact
+	ip link set dev $swp1 down
+}
+
+setup_prepare()
+{
+	h1=${NETIFS[p1]}
+	swp1=${NETIFS[p2]}
+
+	swp2=${NETIFS[p3]}
+	h2=${NETIFS[p4]}
+
+	swp3=${NETIFS[p5]}
+	h3=${NETIFS[p6]}
+
+	vrf_prepare
+	forwarding_enable
+
+	h1_create
+	h2_create
+	h3_create
+
+	switch_create
+}
+
+cleanup()
+{
+	pre_cleanup
+
+	switch_destroy
+
+	h3_destroy
+	h2_destroy
+	h1_destroy
+
+	forwarding_restore
+	vrf_cleanup
+}
+
+bridge_rif_add()
+{
+	rifs_occ_t0=$(devlink_resource_occ_get rifs)
+	__addr_add_del br0 add 192.0.2.2/28
+	rifs_occ_t1=$(devlink_resource_occ_get rifs)
+
+	expected_rifs=$((rifs_occ_t0 + 1))
+
+	[[ $expected_rifs -eq $rifs_occ_t1 ]]
+	check_err $? "Expected $expected_rifs RIFs, $rifs_occ_t1 are used"
+
+	sleep 1
+}
+
+bridge_rif_del()
+{
+	__addr_add_del br0 del 192.0.2.2/28
+}
+
+port_vid_map_rif()
+{
+	RET=0
+
+	# First add {port, VID}->FID for swp1.10, then add a RIF and verify that
+	# packets get the correct VID after routing.
+	vlan_create $swp1 10
+	ip link set dev $swp1.10 master br0
+	bridge_rif_add
+
+	# Replace neighbor to avoid 1 packet which is forwarded in software due
+	# to "unresolved neigh".
+	ip neigh replace dev br0 192.0.2.1 lladdr $(mac_get $h1.10)
+
+	# The hardware matches on the first ethertype which is not VLAN,
+	# so the protocol should be IP.
+	tc filter add dev $swp1 egress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \
+		flower skip_sw dst_ip 192.0.2.1 action pass
+
+	ping_do $h1.10 192.0.2.18
+	check_err $? "Ping failed"
+
+	tc_check_at_least_x_packets "dev $swp1 egress" 101 10
+	check_err $? "Packets were not routed in hardware"
+
+	log_test "Add RIF for existing {port, VID}->FID mapping"
+
+	tc filter del dev $swp1 egress
+
+	bridge_rif_del
+	ip link set dev $swp1.10 nomaster
+	vlan_destroy $swp1 10
+}
+
+rif_port_vid_map()
+{
+	RET=0
+
+	# First add an address to the bridge, which will create a RIF on top of
+	# it, then add a new {port, VID}->FID mapping and verify that packets
+	# get the correct VID after routing.
+	bridge_rif_add
+	vlan_create $swp1 10
+	ip link set dev $swp1.10 master br0
+
+	# Replace neighbor to avoid 1 packet which is forwarded in software due
+	# to "unresolved neigh".
+	ip neigh replace dev br0 192.0.2.1 lladdr $(mac_get $h1.10)
+
+	# The hardware matches on the first ethertype which is not VLAN,
+	# so the protocol should be IP.
+	tc filter add dev $swp1 egress protocol ip pref 1 handle 101 \
+		flower skip_sw dst_ip 192.0.2.1 action pass
+
+	ping_do $h1.10 192.0.2.18
+	check_err $? "Ping failed"
+
+	tc_check_at_least_x_packets "dev $swp1 egress" 101 10
+	check_err $? "Packets were not routed in hardware"
+
+	log_test "Add {port, VID}->FID mapping for FID with a RIF"
+
+	tc filter del dev $swp1 egress
+
+	ip link set dev $swp1.10 nomaster
+	vlan_destroy $swp1 10
+	bridge_rif_del
+}
+
+trap cleanup EXIT
+
+setup_prepare
+setup_wait
+
+tests_run
+
+exit $EXIT_STATUS
-- 
2.35.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ordering tests for unified bridge model
  2022-08-17 15:28 [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ordering tests for unified bridge model Petr Machata
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-08-17 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add egress VID classification test Petr Machata
@ 2022-08-19  4:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2022-08-19  4:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Petr Machata
  Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, netdev, idosch, amcohen, shuah,
	mlxsw

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:28:24 +0200 you wrote:
> Amit Cohen writes:
> 
> Commit 798661c73672 ("Merge branch 'mlxsw-unified-bridge-conversion-part-6'")
> converted mlxsw driver to use unified bridge model. In the legacy model,
> when a RIF was created / destroyed, it was firmware's responsibility to
> update it in the relevant FID classification records. In the unified bridge
> model, this responsibility moved to software.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,1/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1D bridge
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2cd87cea7842
  - [net-next,2/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1Q bridge
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/3a5ddc886847
  - [net-next,3/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for VXLAN
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/cbeb6e1195d1
  - [net-next,4/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add egress VID classification test
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/1623d5719fdf

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-19  4:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-17 15:28 [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ordering tests for unified bridge model Petr Machata
2022-08-17 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1D bridge Petr Machata
2022-08-17 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for 802.1Q bridge Petr Machata
2022-08-17 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ingress RIF configuration test for VXLAN Petr Machata
2022-08-17 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add egress VID classification test Petr Machata
2022-08-19  4:00 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: mlxsw: Add ordering tests for unified bridge model patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).