From: Siddh Raman Pant <code@siddh.me>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v7 0/2] nfc: Fix UAF during datagram sending caused by missing refcounting
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 23:19:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1702925869.git.code@siddh.me> (raw)
Changes in v7:
- Stupidly reverted ordering in recv() too, fix that.
- Remove redundant call to nfc_llcp_sock_free().
Changes in v6:
- Revert label introduction from v4, and thus also v5 entirely.
Changes in v5:
- Move reason = LLCP_DM_REJ under the fail_put_sock label.
- Checkpatch now warns about == NULL check for new_sk, so fix that,
and also at other similar places in the same function.
Changes in v4:
- Fix put ordering and comments.
- Separate freeing in recv() into end labels.
- Remove obvious comment and add reasoning.
- Picked up r-bs by Suman.
Changes in v3:
- Fix missing freeing statements.
Changes in v2:
- Add net-next in patch subject.
- Removed unnecessary extra lock and hold nfc_dev ref when holding llcp_sock.
- Remove last formatting patch.
- Picked up r-b from Krzysztof for LLCP_BOUND patch.
---
For connectionless transmission, llcp_sock_sendmsg() codepath will
eventually call nfc_alloc_send_skb() which takes in an nfc_dev as
an argument for calculating the total size for skb allocation.
virtual_ncidev_close() codepath eventually releases socket by calling
nfc_llcp_socket_release() (which sets the sk->sk_state to LLCP_CLOSED)
and afterwards the nfc_dev will be eventually freed.
When an ndev gets freed, llcp_sock_sendmsg() will result in an
use-after-free as it
(1) doesn't have any checks in place for avoiding the datagram sending.
(2) calls nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame(), which also has a do-while loop
which can race with freeing. This loop contains the call to
nfc_alloc_send_skb() where we dereference the nfc_dev pointer.
nfc_dev is being freed because we do not hold a reference to it when
we hold a reference to llcp_local. Thus, virtual_ncidev_close()
eventually calls nfc_release() due to refcount going to 0.
Since state has to be LLCP_BOUND for datagram sending, we can bail out
early in llcp_sock_sendmsg().
Please review and let me know if any errors are there, and hopefully
this gets accepted.
Thanks,
Siddh
Siddh Raman Pant (2):
nfc: llcp_core: Hold a ref to llcp_local->dev when holding a ref to
llcp_local
nfc: Do not send datagram if socket state isn't LLCP_BOUND
net/nfc/llcp_core.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
net/nfc/llcp_sock.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-12-19 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-19 17:49 Siddh Raman Pant [this message]
2023-12-19 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/2] nfc: llcp_core: Hold a ref to llcp_local->dev when holding a ref to llcp_local Siddh Raman Pant
2023-12-23 19:04 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-12-19 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/2] nfc: Do not send datagram if socket state isn't LLCP_BOUND Siddh Raman Pant
2023-12-25 7:30 ` [PATCH net-next v7 0/2] nfc: Fix UAF during datagram sending caused by missing refcounting patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1702925869.git.code@siddh.me \
--to=code@siddh.me \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).