[PATCH 0/2] bpf, net: Fix smc for CONFIG_BPF_JIT=n

[PATCH 0/2] bpf, net: Fix smc for CONFIG_BPF_JIT=n

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

	Hi all,

If CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y, but CONFIG_BPF_JIT=n (e.g. m68k/allmodconfig),
net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c fails to build.

This patch series fix the issue in two ways, by:
  1. fixing the dummy variant of register_bpf_struct_ops(),
  2. making SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF depend on BPF_JIT.

So far the broken dummy was never detected: until the introduction of
SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF, all users of register_bpf_struct_ops() depended on both
BPF_SYSCALL and BPF_JIT.

Thanks!

Geert Uytterhoeven (2):
  bpf: Fix register_bpf_struct_ops() dummy
  net: smc: SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF should depend on BPF_JIT

 include/linux/bpf.h | 6 +++++-
 net/smc/Kconfig     | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [PATCH 0/2] bpf, net: Fix smc for CONFIG_BPF_JIT=n

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>:

On Thu,  4 Dec 2025 11:29:14 +0100 you wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> If CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL=y, but CONFIG_BPF_JIT=n (e.g. m68k/allmodconfig),
> net/smc/smc_hs_bpf.c fails to build.
> 
> This patch series fix the issue in two ways, by:
>   1. fixing the dummy variant of register_bpf_struct_ops(),
>   2. making SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF depend on BPF_JIT.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [1/2] bpf: Fix register_bpf_struct_ops() dummy
    (no matching commit)
  - [2/2] net: smc: SMC_HS_CTRL_BPF should depend on BPF_JIT
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/861111b69896

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html