From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.secunet.com (mx1.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E66902C0285 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2026 20:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.96.220.36 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768680317; cv=none; b=W51xEbI4XPR19q1S1ktGUEFWTxGcZNirloiPV8T6hnDVNa4nRjILQ84j47tdleu7rgpHYB6E1S6TxvS10Ic5kR1+Y4XDJhorYlkYvVKtPB+bM5f5fro0FsyAKydaUYWVPfviPI40bQdiUA+56pCklwXliyFiI97fkyG6Ld/SABs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768680317; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n2LVIKE8ZiR9aYmjZerRzi9yBOiJUQKGPSysXwqGtJA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=u9O3I2bX4PckWzGW+j0D/G6Yk7VMvZ6NetWK3M4JMcdMmW9D9fA34JCuVfFnCmglMZfcQTnz9U77is6oRlNGU6ynJIvj5zl90EnvNqLS9qJtq1I8UgXbTMYcgOY3aF0Nw6p4lLUWONyDWZf5DmycEFDSwM+JxDPF9wd47l2Rb+M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=secunet.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=secunet.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secunet.com header.i=@secunet.com header.b=k2AgYhTA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.96.220.36 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=secunet.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=secunet.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secunet.com header.i=@secunet.com header.b="k2AgYhTA" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1BC207BB; Sat, 17 Jan 2026 21:05:14 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from mx1.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J4AvGca9VE5W; Sat, 17 Jan 2026 21:05:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from EXCH-02.secunet.de (rl2.secunet.de [10.32.0.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE9F20799; Sat, 17 Jan 2026 21:05:13 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.secunet.com 6BE9F20799 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secunet.com; s=202301; t=1768680313; bh=r3hAE2A+zDdOJDJFW4KMv77chLumUwpJhoZC9biMaO0=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:From; b=k2AgYhTASuzGiCQRf5eGAoNQcg3SOo0gbdOkYWe+TMRC7KT8SKrDYJ5TTNbun9ub2 JV2+x7dyINbNQFv29HoB3myIA/7LxSD9al+dxajrf9dJMrsDe92TZn6AkCk1a8ezJv Flx/9+Qts2RTNB/gFyfXavYwJKKYlg9LfoFZ8jMo+Pgp98FWn0DM5QmNhzXsXcnqwX m/tQ+T3NIbdO7SVhdah/xd2BWMdeTIZl3JW117ifi7AGZ6F7AmeIrgECPN4CxlxQFK jtf71G0YInEDP07lZtj3Zb0gznYb84zSkdzlK97DXUFUhvBKIZ7/ZSzahmhcBPU5XH B6TSjNIs9GTYg== Received: from moon.secunet.de (172.18.149.1) by EXCH-02.secunet.de (10.32.0.172) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.17; Sat, 17 Jan 2026 21:05:12 +0100 From: Antony Antony To: Antony Antony , Steffen Klassert , Herbert Xu , CC: "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Chiachang Wang , Yan Yan , Subject: [PATCH ipsec-next v2 0/4] xfrm: XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE new netlink message Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 21:04:56 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: EXCH-04.secunet.de (10.32.0.184) To EXCH-02.secunet.de (10.32.0.172) The current XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE interface is tightly coupled to policy and SA migration, and it lacks the information required to reliably migrate individual SAs. This makes it unsuitable for IKEv2 deployments, dual-stack setups (IPv4/IPv6), and scenarios where policies are managed externally (e.g., by other daemons than IKE daemon). Mandatory SA selector list The current API requires a non-empty SA selector list, which does not reflect IKEv2 use case. A single Child SA may correspond to multiple policies, and SA discovery already occurs via address and reqid matching. With dual-stack Child SAs this leads to excessive churn: the current method would have to be called up to six times (in/out/fwd × v4/v6) on SA, while the new method only requires two calls. Selectors lack SPI (and marks) XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE cannot uniquely identify an SA when multiple SAs share the same policies (per-CPU SAs, SELinux label-based SAs, etc.). Without the SPI, the kernel may update the wrong SA instance. Reqid cannot be changed Some implementations allocate reqids based on traffic selectors. In host-to-host or selector-changing scenarios, the reqid must change, which the current API cannot express. Because strongSwan and other implementations manage policies independently of the kernel, an interface that updates only a specific SA - with complete and unambiguous identification - is required. XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE provides that interface. It supports migration of a single SA via xfrm_usersa_id (including SPI) and we fix encap removal in this patch set, reqid updates, address changes, and other SA-specific parameters. It avoids the structural limitations of XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE and provides a simpler, extensible mechanism for precise per-SA migration without involving policies. New migration steps: first install block policy, remove the old policy, call XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE for each state, then re-install the policies and remove the block policy. Antony Antony (4): xfrm: remove redundant assignments xfrm: allow migration from UDP encapsulated to non-encapsulated ESP xfrm: rename reqid in xfrm_migrate xfrm: add XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE for single SA migration include/net/xfrm.h | 3 +- include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h | 11 +++ net/key/af_key.c | 10 +-- net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 4 +- net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 34 +++----- net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 164 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c | 3 +- 7 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) --- v1->v2: dropped 6/6. That check is already there where the func is called - merged patch 4/6 and 5/6, to fix use uninitialized value - fix commit messages v2->v3: fix commit message - fixes to error path --- -antony