From: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
To: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Chiachang Wang <chiachangwang@google.com>,
Yan Yan <evitayan@google.com>, <devel@linux-ipsec.org>
Subject: [PATCH ipsec-next v5 0/8] xfrm: XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE new netlink message
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 11:41:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1769509130.git.antony.antony@secunet.com> (raw)
The current XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE interface is tightly coupled to policy and
SA migration, and it lacks the information required to reliably migrate
individual SAs. This makes it unsuitable for IKEv2 deployments,
dual-stack setups (IPv4/IPv6), and scenarios where policies are managed
externally (e.g., by daemons other than the IKE daemon).
Mandatory SA selector list
The current API requires a non-empty SA selector list, which does not
reflect the IKEv2 use case.
A single Child SA may correspond to multiple policies,
and SA discovery already occurs via address and reqid matching. With
dual-stack Child SAs this leads to excessive churn: the current method
would have to be called up to six times (in/out/fwd × v4/v6) on SA,
while the new method only requires two calls.
Selectors lack SPI (and marks)
XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE cannot uniquely identify an SA when multiple SAs share
the same policies (per-CPU SAs, SELinux label-based SAs, etc.). Without
the SPI, the kernel may update the wrong SA instance.
Reqid cannot be changed
Some implementations allocate reqids based on traffic selectors. In
host-to-host or selector-changing scenarios, the reqid must change,
which the current API cannot express.
Because strongSwan and other implementations manage policies
independently of the kernel, an interface that updates only a specific
SA - with complete and unambiguous identification - is required.
XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE provides that interface. It supports migration
of a single SA via xfrm_usersa_id (including SPI) and we fix
encap removal in this patch set, reqid updates, address changes,
and other SA-specific parameters. It avoids the structural limitations
of XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE and provides a simpler, extensible mechanism for
precise per-SA migration without involving policies.
New migration steps: first install block policy, remove the old policy,
call XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE for each state, then re-install the
policies and remove the block policy.
If the target SA tuple (daddr, SPI, proto, family) is already
occupied, the operation returns -EEXIST. In this case the original
SA is not preserved. Userspace must handle -EEXIST by
re-establishing the SA at the IKE level and manage policies.
Antony Antony (8):
xfrm: add missing __rcu annotation to nlsk
xfrm: remove redundant assignments
xfrm: allow migration from UDP encapsulated to non-encapsulated ESP
xfrm: rename reqid in xfrm_migrate
xfrm: split xfrm_state_migrate into create and install functions
xfrm: add state synchronization after migration
xfrm: add error messages to state migration
xfrm: add XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE for single SA migration
include/net/netns/xfrm.h | 2 +-
include/net/xfrm.h | 60 ++++++++++--
include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h | 11 +++
net/key/af_key.c | 10 +-
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 5 +-
net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 119 +++++++++++++++---------
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 180 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c | 3 +-
8 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
---
v1->v2: dropped 6/6. That check is already there where the func is called
- merged patch 4/6 and 5/6, to fix use uninitialized value
- fix commit messages
v2->v3: - fix commit message formatting
v3->v4: add patch to fix pre-existing missing __rcu annotation on nlsk
(exposed by sparse when modifying xfrm_user.c)
v4->v5: add synchronize after migrate and delete it inside a lock
- split xfrm_state_migrate into create and install functions
-antony
next reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-27 10:41 Antony Antony [this message]
2026-01-27 10:42 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 1/8] xfrm: add missing __rcu annotation to nlsk Antony Antony
2026-02-26 17:07 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-05 7:46 ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:42 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 2/8] xfrm: remove redundant assignments Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:42 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 3/8] xfrm: allow migration from UDP encapsulated to non-encapsulated ESP Antony Antony
2026-01-30 11:28 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-02-02 12:57 ` Antony Antony
[not found] ` <CADhJOfbkUFaPfxTBrmOnrEh2JvxPKpkxaRrSdJHZGxeoQsQTcw@mail.gmail.com>
2026-02-02 19:38 ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-02-24 3:28 ` Yan Yan
2026-02-26 15:41 ` Antony Antony
2026-03-06 2:49 ` Yan Yan
2026-01-27 10:42 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 4/8] xfrm: rename reqid in xfrm_migrate Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:43 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 5/8] xfrm: split xfrm_state_migrate into create and install functions Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:43 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 7/8] xfrm: add error messages to state migration Antony Antony
2026-01-30 12:14 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-02-26 15:43 ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-02-26 16:59 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-02 14:06 ` Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:44 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 8/8] xfrm: add XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE_STATE for single SA migration Antony Antony
2026-02-03 21:25 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-02-26 15:46 ` Antony Antony
2026-02-26 18:05 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-02 14:21 ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2026-02-27 1:44 ` Yan Yan
2026-02-27 11:26 ` [devel-ipsec] " Sabrina Dubroca
2026-02-27 23:14 ` Yan Yan
2026-03-08 14:42 ` Antony Antony
2026-03-10 11:09 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-10 16:52 ` Antony Antony
2026-03-14 0:32 ` Yan Yan
2026-03-05 7:51 ` Antony Antony
2026-01-27 10:50 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v5 6/8] xfrm: add state synchronization after migration Antony Antony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1769509130.git.antony.antony@secunet.com \
--to=antony.antony@secunet.com \
--cc=chiachangwang@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@linux-ipsec.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=evitayan@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox