From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F1C43F1670 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 21:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.145 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773179975; cv=none; b=ZKqZ5UEMwA3m+f3IrlV0wACQ9rGUYBQ3F90oOmt0jqmDBF5KlzDzsVwCzYeJUYtXNN00YRRL90vCm7ImjKXxy5dXde7SFDoKjJ6TbIXa/A2EXV8b/ehC6rPX2JeMQQCf9WniO76HlmrwmqSl4N1OmiAhm7gik96iKeFq36cMjhk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773179975; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OlGJHfqdZR2vZF0BbVwEIZKM3bzNZ9oFbQCYAK+5BlM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=BJ9Yo+B0KWaJMvvtA4T4Zprr8zGVE4rxaRqWnlmdFokMsEuiKF0rhcTa6YDJzAygd+7INxTIekzojOiy3WVtm1Q0ytHhktdErEb8VxGll2didZP4jPxh/Dx0m+PVfbbeYa9pFHKaLvPcprLKM3qpn5Hdqinn7/+FXowV3OI22v0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=queasysnail.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=queasysnail.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=queasysnail.net header.i=@queasysnail.net header.b=mHXu0kwG; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=CMXYprae; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.145 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=queasysnail.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=queasysnail.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=queasysnail.net header.i=@queasysnail.net header.b="mHXu0kwG"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="CMXYprae" Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F5F1D0013B; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:59:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:59:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=queasysnail.net; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from :from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1773179971; x=1773266371; bh=vEDjXbW0TS ofbN0q+vGRRNEw7jjpNw5jiwCVhGq0MFQ=; b=mHXu0kwGdnaqLOU7IMzpw2kKjn 8WXzkrcj34FUM2w/gOhryVvn3GAcOOzK2agmQVlp1asn2ybwVFH7EcfJsXBc4fV3 Sozzu7/EoLCbvr0SwsG/Mz6QcL+7R7li/pf/D7LBymAXAOrHj4g6Lbs+M3Dwg/2B kwpGMROA8hN1yWughzt84rO1lWiTLRJAYKC5/Gk99Q97jk9yuqzzSXEcNMJKS1K5 SK4g2jgJU2brfzbrgOnmfBnvYAgCV9xPiXGp9taDq3Bv2nsbFE/M8qXU+KHjyquA X2kDGorCebvIhC5DiBGXsg6D3RjHM57SLP040zk7x30UqT1tT60yBlRiGuwQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1773179971; x=1773266371; bh=vEDjXbW0TSofbN0q+vGRRNEw7jjpNw5jiwC VhGq0MFQ=; b=CMXYpraeQ5obqb5PiLfmoJLVFP0KSU1ZNMrbeFWjRuDJtEAnBg7 0c4UNRI5qBIC/XtPj53r38GnLepc5Z46JzQ8xJQ37q1hWuNxLBV5rX+hZN8vxIod oEQZNS6ZaNpoGZoEYagijpg0nGqgjxCs3J6hd3fyniMh7uAsA8PBEkLbPjdySW4y Ym9BObVFB7d5hDvRVwSHDZDM/WpnWIBSeENfRqe5Kj2roNybV/esbR8hPu39bgxW 5zmbhnXnbZV1I+TycJw66068qW7z3XCyhBi40r+Q3+p4TOe1JdARPw2ckrBlhx/q Li/7DZqiNtjOVQkKZ1D/7LvElATex3F1Ddg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgddvkedvudeiucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefufffkofgggfestdekredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepufgrsghrihhnrgcu ffhusghrohgtrgcuoehsugesqhhuvggrshihshhnrghilhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepjedtuefgffekjeefheekieeivdejhedvudffveefteeuffehgeettedvhfff veffnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepsh gusehquhgvrghshihsnhgrihhlrdhnvghtpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeegpdhmohguvgep shhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehnvghtuggvvhesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdroh hrghdprhgtphhtthhopehsugesqhhuvggrshihshhnrghilhdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthho pehkuhhnihihuhesghhoohhglhgvrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepughsrghhvghrnheskh gvrhhnvghlrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i934648bf:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:59:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Sabrina Dubroca To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sabrina Dubroca , Kuniyuki Iwashima , David Ahern Subject: [PATCH net 0/2] neighbour: fix update of proxy neighbour Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 22:59:15 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit While re-reading some "old" patches I ran into a small change of behavior in commit dc2a27e524ac ("neighbour: Update pneigh_entry in pneigh_create()."). The old behavior was not consistent between ->protocol and ->flags, and didn't offer a way to clear protocol, so maybe it's better to change that (7-years-old [1]) behavior. But then we should change non-proxy neighbours as well to keep neigh/pneigh consistent. [1] df9b0e30d44c ("neighbor: Add protocol attribute") Sabrina Dubroca (2): neighbour: restore protocol != 0 check in pneigh update selftests: rtnetlink: add neighbour update test net/core/neighbour.c | 3 +- tools/testing/selftests/net/rtnetlink.sh | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.51.2