From: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Alice Michael <alice.michael@intel.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>,
Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>,
Grzegorz Nitka <grzegorz.nitka@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH iwl-net 0/2] ice: fix DFLT Rx rule handling for promisc and switchdev
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:09:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1781786935.git.poros@redhat.com> (raw)
Two fixes for the uplink default VSI Rx rule (DFLT) on E810 when the
netdev is in IFF_PROMISC.
Patch 1 drops the redundant per-VLAN promisc expansion that exhausts
the FLU pool on a wide VLAN trunk across several PFs.
Patch 2 keeps the DFLT Rx rule across a switchdev teardown instead of
clobbering the promisc state the operator asked for.
Lab tested on E810-C: functional, VLAN isolation, IFF_ALLMULTI
regression, stress/flap and switchdev-toggle suites pass with no AQ
errors, and the FLU pool stays under its ceiling with all four PFs
loaded.
Petr Oros (2):
ice: skip per-VLAN promisc rules when default VSI Rx rule is set
ice: preserve uplink DFLT Rx rule on switchdev release
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_eswitch.c | 32 ++++++-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 90 +++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-18 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-18 15:09 Petr Oros [this message]
2026-06-18 15:09 ` [PATCH iwl-net 1/2] ice: skip per-VLAN promisc rules when default VSI Rx rule is set Petr Oros
2026-06-18 16:01 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-06-18 15:09 ` [PATCH iwl-net 2/2] ice: preserve uplink DFLT Rx rule on switchdev release Petr Oros
2026-06-18 16:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1781786935.git.poros@redhat.com \
--to=poros@redhat.com \
--cc=alice.michael@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=grzegorz.nitka@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox