From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F6AB40B6DE; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777558022; cv=none; b=WGpuXwADjws1jn3Ei5zkcELXESzpDd6/sTNr9XOn4yQ8FjFrasXubtSFZ/eYZO1cdhmyyDD9yhePK0C2n8xY4ErtyIudw8iJW7s54bW0gnHqLFUEr5IPO/IwlQXl6cOqfgv5HpxSs6ktaTEer7jzKF/UXKkKAKMVNqFCP6XI94A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777558022; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tU+0UxDytiVL+yVVVe0/BtP3SVKh0FV94j6KFD2OP/0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Nk8KlQ4cPRgdV4ZXZkzrIdGlS0gvl86JHxLutoYHsSXrpLYNpkHSV7CwyTh71Q4tfl2Sq5mpiKtmXozPnYWIDYqvZE3tUqjLqCdoLznu4Jz/p5Qg0X9kEyxasYRYAcH04Vy4bho+armN1SaOqTFHR81JQeHC27UXFY5hUHrvx88= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=XRqQ7vFu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="XRqQ7vFu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From: Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To:References; bh=odfisOKLb+4yvBy7AJ37qHBwXC8cw5zHJIG7y4mEJ/0=; b=XR qQ7vFu0LANTE4mm9ix8Cgztidd9/ZquCyUK52yVFPuQkm5lA+iProb2QG98KcUuj8BRdUyali4w+T zG9zkQXaIC2wUnl+2rx33fzfb3xFiypXO6j5ybYInFDr+7zSh6p2Ise5RUbF307L3xY6+bXOi7Sma TbT+nrZPd4U9qIU=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wIS2J-000gvp-5P; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:06:39 +0200 Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:06:39 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Josua Mayer Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Frank Li , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Yazan Shhady , Mikhail Anikin , Alexander Dahl , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "imx@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Vladimir Oltean , Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: imx8dxl: Add SolidRun SoM and HummingBoard Message-ID: References: <20260409-imx8dxl-sr-som-v2-0-83ff20629ba0@solid-run.com> <20260409-imx8dxl-sr-som-v2-3-83ff20629ba0@solid-run.com> <8efbafe3-0a8a-4005-960c-e8fe62cee719@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn > > > > Andrew > > Thanks! > > I don't know how to keep this partial review for v3, so I will send it without. You can add my Reviewed-by. It is on record in the archive that it only applies to a subset. And in general, nobody can know the whole kernel, all the different subsystems, and the details for all the DT bindings. So i would allow some fuzziness for Reviewed-by: for a DT patch. Interesting, an Acked-by: might actually be more appropriate. Acked-by: does not necessarily indicate acknowledgement of the entire patch. For example, if a patch affects multiple subsystems and has an Acked-by: from one subsystem maintainer then this usually indicates acknowledgement of just the part which affects that maintainer’s code. Judgement should be used here. So how about: Acked-by: Andrew Lunn and you can take your pick :-) Andrew