From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 579494908BA; Fri, 4 Sep 2026 12:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788525955; cv=none; b=kNMpJZLwKcclb+h9NMJbz5qB/0KFYuHuT0ow1U7gkI5skKTbmBi12+5AexETjYPxrCElaDUzCvwAUl/vsW0iWLWESyKHNsLucbmvIooWm+m3DeLFPtGH41z7gT/MHONdko+hqNo6OmyUXlocQjpugNbLU/1aW+um20ivvUyjOlY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788525955; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LtDSf5wMlA2r+uHZqfKaOqZ545wbJp1ntr1rZPKlqd0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Unf6skvDCpE9X4+uitw51QetLSiSb6nxwcsL1DP5hHNBZNV5Src0RngGFcOsBamwFbbvFjjep+YZ7X+Ho+NzAb2rjpRFghMLjrN/3nsYYxdxSM1yiUNC9y4lPj8GykKSjGxIYpDoIIVVECXKVEGBRioeHJvlr9BFORVo4bv+D/o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=PKFbW+GK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="PKFbW+GK" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=++VVFRwRIs5zVADnPYbShAcw38wpWaquMiqbejU7Nt0=; b=PKFbW+GKUT54oAJFRHFkzm3whC wDWRYbkzWsVMseahWm0mzViMNkUxip1IKFWxciZGDdOc3X3okEnBpTnnG+H/22W7paGxCxpiynLPd ZezqicjzvgxMqx4FhMLDcH7BbPR1/DsTIIh0RQQ16GLU6o1XKvgeROLWup73I7N8WaYY=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1x2TIS-002yIc-4i; Fri, 04 Sep 2026 14:45:32 +0200 Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 14:45:32 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Bui Duc Phuc Cc: Wei Fang , Frank Li , Shenwei Wang , Andrew Lunn , "davem@davemloft.net" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Richard Cochran , Anson Huang , Stephen Boyd , "imx@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: fec: Propagate PTP initialization errors Message-ID: References: <20260903092430.354186-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: > Second, the current implementation can silently ignore -EPROBE_DEFER and > continue probing instead of deferring. This is a stronger reason. You should mention it in the commit message as part of your justification for net, rather than net-next. Andrew