From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: switch to lockdep_assert_held in phylib
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:58:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d164acb4-024d-fdba-b087-6aa28cdaae1b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181112174416.GF5075@lunn.ch>
On 11/12/18 9:44 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 10:33:08PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
>> index 2e59a8419..5cb06f021 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
>> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ int __mdiobus_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int addr, u32 regnum)
>> {
>> int retval;
>>
>> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&bus->mdio_lock));
>> + lockdep_assert_held_once(&bus->mdio_lock);
>
> Hi Heiner
>
> I don't think there is a clear right/wrong here. This is not hot path
> code. The cost for checking the lock is held is very small compared to
> the actual MDIO transaction. So i don't think we really need to
> optimise this. I do sometimes build with lockdep on, but not
> always. So it is good to know when locking is broken on normal builds.
>
> Florian, what do you think?
lockdep_assert_held_once() also looks at debug_locks (global variable)
so it sounds like in that regard, it would be superior in that it allows
an user-configurable, general debugging facility to behave consistently
as opposed to always having opt-in debugging within the mdio_bus.c file,
but that also has a lot of value. I have to admit debugging MDIO bus
locking issues is not particularly fun, so I would probably stick with
the current code in that regard.
--
Florian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-13 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-11 21:33 [PATCH net-next] net: phy: switch to lockdep_assert_held in phylib Heiner Kallweit
2018-11-12 17:44 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-11-12 18:58 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d164acb4-024d-fdba-b087-6aa28cdaae1b@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox