netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Cc: <Oleksii_Moisieiev@epam.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	<conor+dt@kernel.org>, <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	<vkoul@kernel.org>, <jic23@kernel.org>,
	<olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>, <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>,
	<mchehab@kernel.org>, <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>,
	<andi.shyti@kernel.org>, <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	<edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<hugues.fruchet@foss.st.com>, <lee@kernel.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <arnd@kernel.org>,
	<richardcochran@gmail.com>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	<linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	<alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] firewall: introduce stm32_firewall framework
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 12:38:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d228e17b-4f5f-d5e0-1c59-d247cbc0693e@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZMDzNSkRvvVsxUto@corigine.com>



On 7/26/23 12:19, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 06:40:58PM +0200, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
>> Introduce a STM32 firewall framework that offers to firewall consumers
>> different firewall services such as the ability to check their access
>> rights against their firewall controller(s).
>>
>> The STM32 firewall framework offers a generic API for STM32 firewall
>> controllers that is defined in their drivers to best fit the
>> specificity of each firewall.
>>
>> There are various types of firewalls:
>> -Peripheral firewalls that filter accesses to peripherals
>> -Memory firewalls that filter accesses to memories or memory regions
>> -No type for undefined type of firewall
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com>
> 
> ...
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c b/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c
> 
> ...
> 
>> +int stm32_firewall_populate_bus(struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_controller)
>> +{
>> +	struct stm32_firewall *firewalls;
>> +	struct device_node *child;
>> +	struct device *parent;
>> +	unsigned int i;
>> +	int len;
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	parent = firewall_controller->dev;
>> +
>> +	dev_dbg(parent, "Populating %s system bus\n", dev_name(firewall_controller->dev));
>> +
>> +	for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_of_node(parent), child) {
>> +		/* The feature-domains property is mandatory for firewall bus devices */
>> +		len = of_count_phandle_with_args(child, "feature-domains", "#feature-domain-cells");
>> +		if (len <= 0)
> 
> Coccinelle says that, due to breaking out of a
> for_each_available_child_of_node() loop, a call to of_node_put()
> is needed here
> 

Hi Simon,

Thank you, I already sent a V3 correcting the patch ordering issue. I
will implement this for V4.

>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +		firewalls = kcalloc(len, sizeof(*firewalls), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!firewalls)
> 
> And here.
> 

ditto

>> +			return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +		err = stm32_firewall_get_firewall(child, firewalls, (unsigned int)len);
>> +		if (err) {
>> +			kfree(firewalls);
> 
> And here.
> 

ditto

>> +			return err;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>> +			if (firewall_controller->grant_access(firewall_controller,
>> +							      firewalls[i].firewall_id)) {
>> +				/*
>> +				 * Peripheral access not allowed or not defined.
>> +				 * Mark the node as populated so platform bus won't probe it
>> +				 */
>> +				of_node_set_flag(child, OF_POPULATED);
>> +				dev_err(parent, "%s: Device driver will not be probed\n",
>> +					child->full_name);
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		kfree(firewalls);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stm32_firewall_populate_bus);
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.h b/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.h
> 
> ...
> 
>> +/**
>> + * struct stm32_firewall_controller - Information on firewall controller supplying services
>> + *
>> + * @name			Name of the firewall controller
> 
> kernel-doc complains that name and the other fields of
> struct stm32_firewall_controller are not documented.
> I believe this is because a ':' is needed after the name of
> the parameter (in this case 'name').
> 
>   * @name:			Name of the firewall controller
> 
> Likewise, elsewhere.
> 

I will implement it in V4, thank you.

>> + * @dev				Device reference of the firewall controller
>> + * @mmio			Base address of the firewall controller
>> + * @entry			List entry of the firewall controller list
>> + * @type			Type of firewall
>> + * @max_entries			Number of entries covered by the firewall
>> + * @grant_access		Callback used to grant access for a device access against a
>> + *				firewall controller
>> + * @release_access		Callback used to release resources taken by a device when access was
>> + *				granted
>> + * @grant_memory_range_access	Callback used to grant access for a device to a given memory region
>> + */
>> +struct stm32_firewall_controller {
>> +	const char *name;
>> +	struct device *dev;
>> +	void __iomem *mmio;
>> +	struct list_head entry;
>> +	unsigned int type;
>> +	unsigned int max_entries;
>> +
>> +	int (*grant_access)(struct stm32_firewall_controller *ctrl, u32 id);
>> +	void (*release_access)(struct stm32_firewall_controller *ctrl, u32 id);
>> +	int (*grant_memory_range_access)(struct stm32_firewall_controller *ctrl, phys_addr_t paddr,
>> +					 size_t size);
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * int stm32_firewall_controller_register - Register a firewall controller to the STM32 firewall
> 
> kernel-doc seems unhappy about the presence of 'int' on this line.
> 
>   * stm32_firewall_controller_register - Register a firewall controller to the STM32 firewall
> 
> Likewise, elsewhere.
> 

Yes, I will remove the type in V4.

>> + *					    framework
>> + * @firewall_controller		Firewall controller to register
>> + *
>> + * Returns 0 in case of success or -ENODEV if no controller was given.
>> + */
>> +int stm32_firewall_controller_register(struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_controller);
> 
> ...
> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h b/include/linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..9bdc4060154c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2023, STMicroelectronics - All Rights Reserved
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef STM32_FIREWALL_DEVICE_H
>> +#define STM32_FIREWALL_DEVICE_H
>> +
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> +#define STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS		5
>> +
>> +/* Opaque reference to stm32_firewall_controller */
>> +struct stm32_firewall_controller;
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * stm32_firewall - Information on a device's firewall. Each device can have more than one firewall.
> 
> kernel-doc seems unhappy about the absence of struct on this line.
> 
>   * struct stm32_firewall - Information on a device's firewall. Each device can have more than one firewall.
> 

Yes, I will add the struct in V4.

>> + *
>> + * @firewall_ctrl		Pointer referencing a firewall controller of the device. It is
>> + *				opaque so a device cannot manipulate the controller's ops or access
>> + *				the controller's data
>> + * @extra_args			Extra arguments that are implementation dependent
>> + * @entry			Name of the firewall entry
>> + * @extra_args_size		Number of extra arguments
>> + * @firewall_id			Firewall ID associated the device for this firewall controller
>> + */
>> +struct stm32_firewall {
>> +	struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_ctrl;
>> +	u32 extra_args[STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS];
>> +	const char *entry;
>> +	size_t extra_args_size;
>> +	u32 firewall_id;
>> +};
> 
> ...
> 
Best regards,
Gatien

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-26 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-25 16:40 [PATCH v2 00/11] Introduce STM32 Firewall framework Gatien Chevallier
2023-07-25 16:40 ` [IGNORE][PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: Document common device controller bindings Gatien Chevallier
2023-07-25 17:49   ` Rob Herring
2023-07-26 10:29   ` Simon Horman
2023-07-25 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: bus: document RIFSC Gatien Chevallier
2023-07-25 17:49   ` Rob Herring
2023-07-25 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] dt-bindings: bus: document ETZPC Gatien Chevallier
2023-07-25 17:49   ` Rob Herring
2023-07-25 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] dt-bindings: treewide: add feature-domains description Gatien Chevallier
2023-07-25 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] firewall: introduce stm32_firewall framework Gatien Chevallier
2023-07-26 10:19   ` Simon Horman
2023-07-26 10:38     ` Gatien CHEVALLIER [this message]
2023-07-26 11:39       ` Simon Horman
2023-07-26 10:22   ` Simon Horman
2023-07-26 10:39     ` Gatien CHEVALLIER
2023-07-25 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] of: property: fw_devlink: Add support for "feature-domains" Gatien Chevallier
2023-07-25 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] bus: rifsc: introduce RIFSC firewall controller driver Gatien Chevallier
2023-07-26 10:26   ` Simon Horman
2023-07-26 10:32     ` Gatien CHEVALLIER
2023-07-25 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] arm64: dts: st: add RIFSC as a domain controller for STM32MP25x boards Gatien Chevallier
2023-07-25 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] bus: etzpc: introduce ETZPC firewall controller driver Gatien Chevallier
2023-07-25 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] ARM: dts: stm32: add ETZPC as a system bus for STM32MP15x boards Gatien Chevallier
2023-07-25 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] ARM: dts: stm32: add ETZPC as a system bus for STM32MP13x boards Gatien Chevallier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d228e17b-4f5f-d5e0-1c59-d247cbc0693e@foss.st.com \
    --to=gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com \
    --cc=Oleksii_Moisieiev@epam.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=hugues.fruchet@foss.st.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).