From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B5BC43215 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA242070A for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dlink.ru header.i=@dlink.ru header.b="fG4FBn8+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726694AbfK0LpJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:45:09 -0500 Received: from mail.dlink.ru ([178.170.168.18]:37264 "EHLO fd.dlink.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726204AbfK0LpI (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:45:08 -0500 Received: by fd.dlink.ru (Postfix, from userid 5000) id 793FD1B2130C; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:45:05 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 fd.dlink.ru 793FD1B2130C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dlink.ru; s=mail; t=1574855105; bh=o17u0Mv938KWC6Gx4yfR1SxtCwAXy8AEp8aMy0JxuQM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=fG4FBn8+OFjm9R90Co2zGjnVTCOBwLns0io5LQ6aQAqW4l5BKg+W8OJejOJ6hFehI XvzCdOo6K+KA2LuiZ6ucmaBkzNTheV+DjIkdOUAyVDz9Bo25bPtFzy3REOSpPNJkC1 w9dXfcWNvOQvx1iefFnLF0bcFzvC4qpCLadcrDf4= Received: from mail.rzn.dlink.ru (mail.rzn.dlink.ru [178.170.168.13]) by fd.dlink.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506021B20153; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:44:55 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 fd.dlink.ru 506021B20153 Received: from mail.rzn.dlink.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rzn.dlink.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EFB1B210B7; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:44:54 +0300 (MSK) Received: from mail.rzn.dlink.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rzn.dlink.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:44:54 +0300 (MSK) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 14:44:54 +0300 From: Alexander Lobakin To: Nicholas Johnson Cc: Luciano Coelho , "David S. Miller" , Edward Cree , Jiri Pirko , Eric Dumazet , Ido Schimmel , Paolo Abeni , Petr Machata , Sabrina Dubroca , Florian Fainelli , Jassi Brar , Manish Chopra , GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com, Johannes Berg , Emmanuel Grumbach , Intel Linux Wireless , Kalle Valo , "Kenneth R. Crudup" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: wireless: intel: iwlwifi: fix GRO_NORMAL packet stalling In-Reply-To: References: <20191127094123.18161-1-alobakin@dlink.ru> <7a9332bf645fbb8c9fff634a3640c092fb9b4b79.camel@intel.com> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.0 Message-ID: X-Sender: alobakin@dlink.ru Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Nicholas Johnson wrote 27.11.2019 14:16: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 01:29:03PM +0300, Alexander Lobakin wrote: >> Nicholas Johnson wrote 27.11.2019 13:23: >> > Hi, >> >> Hi Nicholas, >> >> > Sorry for top down reply, stuck with my phone. If it replies HTML >> > then I am so done with Outlook client. > > I am very sorry to everybody for the improper reply. It looks like it > was HTML as vger.kernel.org told me I was spam. If anybody knows a good > email client for kernel development for Android then I am all ears. > > I went home early and I have my computer(s) now. > >> > >> > Does my Reported-by tag apply here? >> > >> > As the reporter, should I check to see that it indeed solves the >> > issue on the original hardware setup? I can do this within two hours >> > and give Tested-by then. >> >> Oops, I'm sorry I forgot to mention you in the commit message. Let's >> see what Dave will say, I have no problems with waiting for your test >> results and publishing v2. > > All good. :) > > I tested the the patch and it works fine. Great work, the first > hypothesis as to what the problem was is correct. It now connects to > wireless networks without any hassles. > > Reported-by: Nicholas Johnson > > Tested-by: Nicholas Johnson > Oh, much thanks for testing this out! I think this one will hit netdev fixes tree soon. > I do not understand the networking subsystem well enough to give > Reviewed-by, yet. Hopefully in time. I'm sure you will :) > Thanks to everybody for handling my report. > >> >> > Thanks >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Nicholas >> >> Regards, >> ᚷ ᛖ ᚢ ᚦ ᚠ ᚱ > > Regards, > Nicholas Regards, ᚷ ᛖ ᚢ ᚦ ᚠ ᚱ