From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ding Tianhong Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] net/cxgb4: Use new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 18:23:51 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1499955692-26556-1-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> <1499955692-26556-4-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Rutland , Gabriele Paoloni , Asit K Mallick , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , LinuxArm , Ashok Raj , Bjorn Helgaas , Jeff Kirsher , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Ganesh GR , Bob Shaw , Patrick J Cramer , Bjorn Helgaas , Michael Werner , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Amir Ancel , Netdev , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , David Laight , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Alexander Duyck Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Casey, Alexander: Thanks for the great efforts from both of you, It looks like we have reached a consensus finally, could you please add a confirmation message just like Reviewed-by or something else, thanks. :) Ding On 2017/7/14 2:44, Casey Leedom wrote: > Yeah, I think this works for now. We'll stumble over what to do when we want to mix upstream TLPs without Relaxed Ordering Attributes directed at problematic Root Complexes, and Peer-to-Peer TLPs with Relaxed Ordering Attributes ... or vice versa depending on which target PCIe Device has issues with Relaxed Ordering. > > > Thanks for all the work! > > > Casey > >