From: "Jiayuan Chen" <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"David Ahern" <dsahern@kernel.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Jiayuan Chen" <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>,
syzbot+334190e097a98a1b81bb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1] net: nexthop: fix panic when IPv4 route references IPv6 nexthop
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2026 01:57:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3722ec10046a2fde021a2b8a51a83431c8bcbac@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iJjjNW4U6ZxVcuRxWaKPbo1wfEyBD4Etkf+f6CWyhAHFg@mail.gmail.com>
March 1, 2026 at 01:04, "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com mailto:edumazet@google.com?to=%22Eric%20Dumazet%22%20%3Cedumazet%40google.com%3E > wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2026 at 5:33 PM David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 2/28/26 8:39 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Feb 2026 11:13:59 +0800 Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> > From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>
> >
> > fib_check_nexthop() does not validate that the nexthop family matches
> > the route family. This allows an IPv4 route to reference an IPv6
> > nexthop object. When the IPv4 route is looked up, __mkroute_output()
> > accesses nhc->nhc_pcpu_rth_output which is never allocated for IPv6
> > nexthops (fib6_nh_init does not call fib_nh_common_init), causing a
> > NULL pointer dereference.
> >
> > Note that this is not about IPv4 routes with IPv6 gateways (RFC 5549),
> > which uses an AF_INET nexthop with nhc_gw_family=AF_INET6 and properly
> > allocates nhc_pcpu_rth_output via fib_nh_common_init(). The bug here
> > is an AF_INET6 nexthop object being directly referenced by an IPv4
> > route, which is an invalid combination.
> >
> > Add the missing family check in fib_check_nexthop(), mirroring what
> > fib6_check_nexthop() already does for the reverse direction (rejecting
> > IPv6 routes that reference IPv4 nexthop objects).
> >
> > AFAICT this breaks a bunch of tests, quickest to repro with is
> > gre_multipath_nh.sh but you should probably run fib_nexthops.sh
> > on your fix as well.
> >
> > nothing to fix. The patch is wrong. IPv4 supports IPv6 gateways; that is
> > a known feature.
> >
> > please post the stack trace for the panic
> >
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/698f8482.a70a0220.2c38d7.00ca.GAE@google.com/T/
>
My bad, the previous fix was wrong - IPv4 routes referencing IPv6
nexthop objects is totally via this path.
The crash actually only happens with loopback nexthops, e.g.:
ip nexthop add id 100 via fe80::1 dev lo
In fib6_nh_init(), nexthop objects always have fc_dst=:: (no
destination prefix), so fib6_is_reject() returns true for any
nexthop using loopback device. This causes it to skip
fib_nh_common_init(), leaving nhc_pcpu_rth_output, nhc_exceptions
and nhc_rth_input all NULL. When an IPv4 route later references
this nexthop, __mkroute_output() hits raw_cpu_ptr(NULL) and crashes.
The simplest fix is just allocating nhc_pcpu_rth_output in the
reject path of fib6_nh_init(). The release path already handles
it correctly.
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index c0350d97307e..4e7c44101709 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -3643,6 +3643,12 @@ int fib6_nh_init(struct net *net, struct fib6_nh *fib6_nh,
goto out;
}
}
+ fib6_nh->nh_common.nhc_pcpu_rth_output =
+ alloc_percpu_gfp(struct rtable __rcu *, gfp_flags);
+ if (!fib6_nh->nh_common.nhc_pcpu_rth_output) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
goto pcpu_alloc;
}
./fib_nexthops.sh
Tests passed: 244
Tests failed: 0
Tests skipped: 2
root@bms-ytl-d1-ap
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-01 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-28 3:13 [PATCH net v1] net: nexthop: fix panic when IPv4 route references IPv6 nexthop Jiayuan Chen
2026-02-28 15:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-28 16:33 ` David Ahern
2026-02-28 17:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-03-01 1:57 ` Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2026-03-01 18:05 ` David Ahern
2026-03-01 18:11 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3722ec10046a2fde021a2b8a51a83431c8bcbac@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@shopee.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+334190e097a98a1b81bb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox