From: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: fix skb_ext_total_length() BUILD_BUG_ON with CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 19:23:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4305d64-2632-4714-8291-d948c515c34d@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e6d5484-3670-40fa-8c09-201b76cd0088@t-8ch.de>
On 3/30/26 16:48, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2026-03-30 16:53:37+0300, Konstantin Khorenko wrote:
>> When CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL=y is enabled, GCC inserts branch profiling
>> counters into skb_ext_total_length() and, combined with -fno-tree-loop-im
>> from GCOV, prevents the compiler from constant-folding the loop that
>> sums skb_ext_type_len[] array elements. This causes the compile-time
>> BUILD_BUG_ON(skb_ext_total_length() > 255) check to fail, even though
>> the actual computed value is well below 255.
>>
>> The kernel already has a guard for CONFIG_KCOV_INSTRUMENT_ALL, which
>> causes the same problem. Add a similar guard for GCOV.
>>
>> The number of loop iterations matters: with 4 extension types (as in
>> earlier kernels), GCC 11 can still constant-fold despite GCOV. With 5+
>> types (after SKB_EXT_CAN and other additions), it gives up. This is
>> why the issue only manifests in recent kernels with GCOV enabled.
>>
>> Tested with GCC 11.4.1 and GCC 16.0.1 20260327 (experimental) - both
>> exhibit the same behavior.
>>
>> Note that skb_ext_total_length() is still correct at runtime; this
>> change only allows the build to succeed when GCOV_PROFILE_ALL is
>> enabled for coverage analysis.
>>
>> Fixes: 5d21d0a65b57 ("net: generalize calculation of skb extensions length")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@virtuozzo.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Thank you very much for the review, Tomas!
> Would it help to mark skb_ext_total_length() as
> 'notrace'/'no_instrument_function'?
That's interesting.
"notrace" did not help, after all it just disables ftrace instrumentation in the beginning of functions.
But! i have also tried __no_profile (__no_profile_instrument_function__) and it helps!
-static __always_inline unsigned int skb_ext_total_length(void)
+static __always_inline __no_profile unsigned int skb_ext_total_length(void)
__no_profile_instrument_function__ tells GCC not to insert GCOV counters
into this specific function,
so without GCOV counters in the loop body, the loop becomes "clean" and
even though -fno-tree-loop-im is still active globally,
gcc can now constant-fold this clean loop.
As a result skb_ext_total_length() is fully evaluated at compile time and BUILD_BUG_ON succeeds.
Thus we can probably use this hack and create the following patch instead:
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 0e217041958a..47c7f0ab6e84 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -5145,7 +5145,7 @@ static const u8 skb_ext_type_len[] = {
#endif
};
-static __always_inline unsigned int skb_ext_total_length(void)
+static __always_inline __no_profile unsigned int skb_ext_total_length(void)
{
unsigned int l = SKB_EXT_CHUNKSIZEOF(struct skb_ext);
int i;
@@ -5159,9 +5159,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int skb_ext_total_length(void)
static void skb_extensions_init(void)
{
BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_EXT_NUM > 8);
-#if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KCOV_INSTRUMENT_ALL)
BUILD_BUG_ON(skb_ext_total_length() > 255);
-#endif
skbuff_ext_cache = kmem_cache_create("skbuff_ext_cache",
SKB_EXT_ALIGN_VALUE * skb_ext_total_length(),
Tomas, do you want me to send the v2 patch with that solution?
--
Best regards,
Konstantin Khorenko,
Virtuozzo Linux Kernel Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 13:53 [PATCH 0/1] Fix kernel build failure with CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL=y Konstantin Khorenko
2026-03-30 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/1] net: fix skb_ext_total_length() BUILD_BUG_ON with CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL Konstantin Khorenko
2026-03-30 14:48 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-03-30 17:23 ` Konstantin Khorenko [this message]
2026-03-31 7:07 ` Thomas Weißschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d4305d64-2632-4714-8291-d948c515c34d@virtuozzo.com \
--to=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox