[PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD

[PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Julia Lawall]

Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used.

---

 drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c                                |    5 -----
 drivers/dma/dw/core.c                                 |    1 -
 drivers/dma/pl330.c                                   |    1 -
 drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c                              |    2 --
 drivers/dma/st_fdma.c                                 |    3 ---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c               |    1 -
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c |    5 -----
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c       |    3 ---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c        |    1 -
 drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c                |    1 -
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c                         |    2 --
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c                         |    2 --
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c                          |    1 -
 drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c                       |    1 -
 drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c              |    2 --
 fs/btrfs/relocation.c                                 |    1 -
 fs/nfs/nfs4client.c                                   |    1 -
 fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c                                 |    1 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c                                      |    1 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c                                    |    1 -
 20 files changed, 36 deletions(-)

[PATCH 02/20] net/mlx5e: drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Julia Lawall]

Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used.

These became useless in 244cd96adb5f ("net_sched: remove list_head
from tc_action")

The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
identifier x;
@@
- LIST_HEAD(x);
  ... when != x
// </smpl>

Fixes: 244cd96adb5f ("net_sched: remove list_head from tc_action")
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

---
Successfully 0-day tested on 151 configurations.

 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c |    3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
index 4d6c9757afad..cae6c6d48984 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
@@ -2183,7 +2183,6 @@ static bool modify_header_match_supported(struct mlx5_flow_spec *spec,
 {
 	const struct tc_action *a;
 	bool modify_ip_header;
-	LIST_HEAD(actions);
 	u8 htype, ip_proto;
 	void *headers_v;
 	u16 ethertype;
@@ -2272,7 +2271,6 @@ static int parse_tc_nic_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct tcf_exts *exts,
 {
 	struct mlx5_nic_flow_attr *attr = flow->nic_attr;
 	const struct tc_action *a;
-	LIST_HEAD(actions);
 	u32 action = 0;
 	int err, i;
 
@@ -2511,7 +2509,6 @@ static int parse_tc_fdb_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct tcf_exts *exts,
 	struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv = priv->ppriv;
 	struct ip_tunnel_info *info = NULL;
 	const struct tc_action *a;
-	LIST_HEAD(actions);
 	bool encap = false;
 	u32 action = 0;
 	int err, i;

Re: [PATCH 02/20] net/mlx5e: drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Leon Romanovsky]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 583 bytes --]

On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 09:56:57AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used.
>
> These became useless in 244cd96adb5f ("net_sched: remove list_head
> from tc_action")
>
> The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> identifier x;
> @@
> - LIST_HEAD(x);
>   ... when != x
> // </smpl>
>
> Fixes: 244cd96adb5f ("net_sched: remove list_head from tc_action")
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
>

Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

[PATCH 16/20] mlxsw: spectrum: drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Julia Lawall]

Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used.

The uses were removed in 244cd96adb5f ("net_sched: remove
list_head from tc_action"), but not the declaration.

The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
identifier x;
@@
- LIST_HEAD(x);
  ... when != x
// </smpl>

Fixes: 244cd96adb5f ("net_sched: remove list_head from tc_action")
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

---
Successfully 0-day tested on 151 configurations.

 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
index c742a581f0d0..eed1045e4d96 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
@@ -1347,7 +1347,6 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_add_cls_matchall(struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port,
 	struct mlxsw_sp_port_mall_tc_entry *mall_tc_entry;
 	__be16 protocol = f->common.protocol;
 	const struct tc_action *a;
-	LIST_HEAD(actions);
 	int err;
 
 	if (!tcf_exts_has_one_action(f->exts)) {

[PATCH 19/20] net/mlx4_core: drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Julia Lawall]

Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares has never
been used.

The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
identifier x;
@@
- LIST_HEAD(x);
  ... when != x
// </smpl>

Fixes: c82e9aa0a8bc ("mlx4_core: resource tracking for HCA resources used by guests")
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

---
Successfully 0-day tested on 151 configurations.

 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c |    5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c
index 31bd56727022..eb13d3618162 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c
@@ -4729,7 +4729,6 @@ static void rem_slave_srqs(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave)
 	struct res_srq *tmp;
 	int state;
 	u64 in_param;
-	LIST_HEAD(tlist);
 	int srqn;
 	int err;
 
@@ -4795,7 +4794,6 @@ static void rem_slave_cqs(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave)
 	struct res_cq *tmp;
 	int state;
 	u64 in_param;
-	LIST_HEAD(tlist);
 	int cqn;
 	int err;
 
@@ -4858,7 +4856,6 @@ static void rem_slave_mrs(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave)
 	struct res_mpt *tmp;
 	int state;
 	u64 in_param;
-	LIST_HEAD(tlist);
 	int mptn;
 	int err;
 
@@ -4926,7 +4923,6 @@ static void rem_slave_mtts(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave)
 	struct res_mtt *mtt;
 	struct res_mtt *tmp;
 	int state;
-	LIST_HEAD(tlist);
 	int base;
 	int err;
 
@@ -5115,7 +5111,6 @@ static void rem_slave_eqs(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave)
 	struct res_eq *tmp;
 	int err;
 	int state;
-	LIST_HEAD(tlist);
 	int eqn;
 
 	err = move_all_busy(dev, slave, RES_EQ);

[PATCH 20/20] cw1200: drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Julia Lawall]

Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares has never
been used.

The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
identifier x;
@@
- LIST_HEAD(x);
  ... when != x
// </smpl>

Fixes: a910e4a94f692 ("cw1200: add driver for the ST-E CW1100 & CW1200 WLAN chipsets")
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

---
Successfully 0-day tested on 151 configurations.

 drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c
index 7c31b63b8258..7895efefa95d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c
@@ -283,7 +283,6 @@ int cw1200_queue_put(struct cw1200_queue *queue,
 		     struct cw1200_txpriv *txpriv)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
-	LIST_HEAD(gc_list);
 	struct cw1200_queue_stats *stats = queue->stats;
 
 	if (txpriv->link_id >= queue->stats->map_capacity)

Re: [PATCH 20/20] cw1200: drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Kalle Valo]

Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> writes:

> Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares has never
> been used.
>
> The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> identifier x;
> @@
> - LIST_HEAD(x);
>   ... when != x
> // </smpl>
>
> Fixes: a910e4a94f692 ("cw1200: add driver for the ST-E CW1100 & CW1200 WLAN chipsets")
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
>
> ---
> Successfully 0-day tested on 151 configurations.

I assume I can take this to wireless-drivers-next. If you are planning
to push this via some other tree please let me know.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Re: [PATCH 20/20] cw1200: drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Julia Lawall]

On Tue, 8 Jan 2019, Kalle Valo wrote:

> Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> writes:
>
> > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares has never
> > been used.
> >
> > The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows:
> > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >
> > // <smpl>
> > @@
> > identifier x;
> > @@
> > - LIST_HEAD(x);
> >   ... when != x
> > // </smpl>
> >
> > Fixes: a910e4a94f692 ("cw1200: add driver for the ST-E CW1100 & CW1200 WLAN chipsets")
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
> >
> > ---
> > Successfully 0-day tested on 151 configurations.
>
> I assume I can take this to wireless-drivers-next. If you are planning
> to push this via some other tree please let me know.

Please take it.  Thanks.

julia

Re: [PATCH 20/20] cw1200: drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Kalle Valo]

Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote:

> Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares has never
> been used.
> 
> The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> 
> // <smpl>
> @@
> identifier x;
> @@
> - LIST_HEAD(x);
>   ... when != x
> // </smpl>
> 
> Fixes: a910e4a94f692 ("cw1200: add driver for the ST-E CW1100 & CW1200 WLAN chipsets")
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

06605b0d38b4 cw1200: drop useless LIST_HEAD

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10741603/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Re: [PATCH 20/20] cw1200: drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Kalle Valo]

Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote:

> Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares has never
> been used.
> 
> The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> 
> // <smpl>
> @@
> identifier x;
> @@
> - LIST_HEAD(x);
>   ... when != x
> // </smpl>
> 
> Fixes: a910e4a94f692 ("cw1200: add driver for the ST-E CW1100 & CW1200 WLAN chipsets")
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

06605b0d38b4 cw1200: drop useless LIST_HEAD

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10741603/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD

[SF Markus Elfring]

> Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used.

Do you know any more places where calls of other macros can be deleted?

Regards,
Markus

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Tom Psyborg]

Why do you CC this to so many lists?

On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote:
> Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used.
>
> ---
>
>  drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c                                |    5 -----
>  drivers/dma/dw/core.c                                 |    1 -
>  drivers/dma/pl330.c                                   |    1 -
>  drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c                              |    2 --
>  drivers/dma/st_fdma.c                                 |    3 ---
>  drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c               |    1 -
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c |    5 -----
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c       |    3 ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c        |    1 -
>  drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c                |    1 -
>  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c                         |    2 --
>  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c                         |    2 --
>  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c                          |    1 -
>  drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c                       |    1 -
>  drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c              |    2 --
>  fs/btrfs/relocation.c                                 |    1 -
>  fs/nfs/nfs4client.c                                   |    1 -
>  fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c                                 |    1 -
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c                                      |    1 -
>  fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c                                    |    1 -
>  20 files changed, 36 deletions(-)
>

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Julia Lawall]

On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Tom Psyborg wrote:

> Why do you CC this to so many lists?

Because the different files are in different subsystems.  The cover letter
goes to a list for each file, or to a person if there is no list.  The
patches go to the people and lists associated with the affected files.

julia

>
> On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> wrote:
> > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used.
> >
> > ---
> >
> >  drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c                                |    5 -----
> >  drivers/dma/dw/core.c                                 |    1 -
> >  drivers/dma/pl330.c                                   |    1 -
> >  drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c                              |    2 --
> >  drivers/dma/st_fdma.c                                 |    3 ---
> >  drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c               |    1 -
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c |    5 -----
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c       |    3 ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c        |    1 -
> >  drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c                |    1 -
> >  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c                         |    2 --
> >  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c                         |    2 --
> >  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c                          |    1 -
> >  drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c                       |    1 -
> >  drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c              |    2 --
> >  fs/btrfs/relocation.c                                 |    1 -
> >  fs/nfs/nfs4client.c                                   |    1 -
> >  fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c                                 |    1 -
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c                                      |    1 -
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c                                    |    1 -
> >  20 files changed, 36 deletions(-)
> >
>

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Tom Psyborg]

there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is
more than enough

On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, Tom Psyborg wrote:
>
>> Why do you CC this to so many lists?
>
> Because the different files are in different subsystems.  The cover letter
> goes to a list for each file, or to a person if there is no list.  The
> patches go to the people and lists associated with the affected files.
>
> julia
>
>>
>> On 23/12/2018, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> > Drop LIST_HEAD where the variable it declares is never used.
>> >
>> > ---
>> >
>> >  drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c                                |    5 -----
>> >  drivers/dma/dw/core.c                                 |    1 -
>> >  drivers/dma/pl330.c                                   |    1 -
>> >  drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c                              |    2 --
>> >  drivers/dma/st_fdma.c                                 |    3 ---
>> >  drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c               |    1 -
>> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c |    5 -----
>> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c       |    3 ---
>> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c        |    1 -
>> >  drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/queue.c                |    1 -
>> >  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c                         |    2 --
>> >  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c                         |    2 --
>> >  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c                          |    1 -
>> >  drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c                       |    1 -
>> >  drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c              |    2 --
>> >  fs/btrfs/relocation.c                                 |    1 -
>> >  fs/nfs/nfs4client.c                                   |    1 -
>> >  fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c                                 |    1 -
>> >  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c                                      |    1 -
>> >  fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c                                    |    1 -
>> >  20 files changed, 36 deletions(-)
>> >
>>
>

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Dan Carpenter]

On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote:
> there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is
> more than enough
> 

I don't know who you were discussing this with...

You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists.  That much is a
clear rule.

For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one.  I was in
a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the
patches".  It depends on the context, of course.  If the patches are
dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything.

If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into
get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic.

My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver???  I always
remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue.

regards,
dan carpenter

PS:  Please, no more top posting.

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Darrick J. Wong]

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote:
> > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is
> > more than enough
> > 
> 
> I don't know who you were discussing this with...
> 
> You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists.  That much is a
> clear rule.
> 
> For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one.  I was in
> a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the
> patches".  It depends on the context, of course.  If the patches are
> dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything.

Agreed.  Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches"
(as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :)

For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches
than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to
go wanting for more context.

--D

> If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into
> get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic.
> 
> My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver???  I always
> remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue.
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
> PS:  Please, no more top posting.
> 

Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD

[Julia Lawall]

On Fri, 28 Dec 2018, Darrick J. Wong wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:40:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote:
> > > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is
> > > more than enough
> > >
> >
> > I don't know who you were discussing this with...
> >
> > You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists.  That much is a
> > clear rule.
> >
> > For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one.  I was in
> > a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the
> > patches".  It depends on the context, of course.  If the patches are
> > dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything.
>
> Agreed.  Ms. Lawall, sending "Cover letter + all relevant XFS patches"
> (as you did) was exactly the right thing for us xfs types. :)
>
> For that matter, we prefer to receive through linux-xfs more patches
> than necessary (one can send the entire series if one is unsure) than to
> go wanting for more context.

Thanks for the confirmation.  I was planning to ignore the 4-5 advice,
because there is no way in this case to make a meaningful 4-5 list
suggestion - it's either all or nothing.  But 20 patches at once is
perhaps a lot as well.  In this case, I just wanted to get rid of the
whole issue at once.

julia