Re: [PATCH v3 net 0/4] qbv cycle time extension/truncation

["Abdul Rahim, Faizal" <faizal.abdul.rahim@linux.intel.com>]

On 21/12/2023 4:52 pm, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-12-19 at 18:56 +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> How are you testing the behavior, and who reported the issues / what prompted
>> the changes? Honestly I'm not very confident in the changes we're
>> pushing down the linux-stable pipe. They don't look all that obvious, so
>> I still think that having selftests would help.
> 
> I agree with Vladimir, this looks quite a bit too complex for a net fix
> at this late point of the cycle. Given the period of the year, I think
> it could be too late even for net-next - for this cycle.
> 

Would it be better to just submit into net-next and target for the next 
cycle ? I'm okay with that.

> It would be great if you could add some self-tests.
> 
> @Faizal: I understand your setup is quite complex, but it would be
> great if you could come-up with something similar that could fit
> tools/testing/selftests/net
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Paolo
> 

Ohh my bad, I thought selftest is just to develop and run the test case 
locally, but it seems that it also refers to integrating it into the 
existing selftest framework ?
Got it. I'll explore that and cover extension/truncation cases.