From: "Paraschiv, Andra-Irina" <andraprs@amazon.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Duncan <davdunc@amazon.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>, Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.de>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] vsock: Add flag field in the vsock address
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:18:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5c55d2e-5dc3-96f2-2333-37e778c761ae@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201202133754.2ek2wgutkujkvxaf@steredhat>
On 02/12/2020 15:37, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> Hi Andra,
>
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 05:25:02PM +0200, Andra Paraschiv wrote:
>> vsock enables communication between virtual machines and the host
>> they are
>> running on. Nested VMs can be setup to use vsock channels, as the multi
>> transport support has been available in the mainline since the v5.5
>> Linux kernel
>> has been released.
>>
>> Implicitly, if no host->guest vsock transport is loaded, all the
>> vsock packets
>> are forwarded to the host. This behavior can be used to setup
>> communication
>> channels between sibling VMs that are running on the same host. One
>> example can
>> be the vsock channels that can be established within AWS Nitro Enclaves
>> (see Documentation/virt/ne_overview.rst).
>>
>> To be able to explicitly mark a connection as being used for a
>> certain use case,
>> add a flag field in the vsock address data structure. The
>> "svm_reserved1" field
>> has been repurposed to be the flag field. The value of the flag will
>> then be
>> taken into consideration when the vsock transport is assigned.
>>
>> This way can distinguish between nested VMs / local communication and
>> sibling
>> VMs use cases. And can also setup one or more types of communication
>> at the same
>> time.
>>
>
> Another thing worth mentioning is that for now it is not supported in
> vhost-vsock, since we are discarding every packet not addressed to the
> host.
Right, thanks for the follow-up.
>
> What we should do would be:
> - add a new IOCTL to vhost-vsock to enable sibling communication, by
> default I'd like to leave it disabled
>
> - allow sibling forwarding only if both guests have sibling
> communication enabled and we should implement some kind of filtering
> or network namespace support to allow the communication only between a
> subset of VMs
>
>
> Do you have plans to work on it?
Nope, not yet. But I can take some time in the second part of December /
beginning of January for this. And we can catch up in the meantime if
there is something blocking or more clarifications are needed to make it
work.
Thanks,
Andra
>
>
> Otherwise I put it in my to-do list and hope I have time to do it (maybe
> next month).
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
Amazon Development Center (Romania) S.R.L. registered office: 27A Sf. Lazar Street, UBC5, floor 2, Iasi, Iasi County, 700045, Romania. Registered in Romania. Registration number J22/2621/2005.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 15:25 [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] vsock: Add flag field in the vsock address Andra Paraschiv
2020-12-01 15:25 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/3] vm_sockets: Include flag field in the vsock address data structure Andra Paraschiv
2020-12-01 16:09 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-12-01 18:15 ` Paraschiv, Andra-Irina
2020-12-02 8:32 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-12-03 9:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-12-03 10:32 ` Paraschiv, Andra-Irina
2020-12-03 13:38 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-12-03 14:04 ` Paraschiv, Andra-Irina
2020-12-01 15:25 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/3] virtio_transport_common: Set sibling VMs flag on the receive path Andra Paraschiv
2020-12-01 16:22 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-12-01 19:01 ` Paraschiv, Andra-Irina
2020-12-02 8:53 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-12-01 15:25 ` [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] af_vsock: Assign the vsock transport considering the vsock address flag Andra Paraschiv
2020-12-01 16:23 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-12-01 19:06 ` Paraschiv, Andra-Irina
2020-12-01 16:27 ` [PATCH net-next v1 0/3] vsock: Add flag field in the vsock address Stefano Garzarella
2020-12-01 18:02 ` Paraschiv, Andra-Irina
2020-12-02 13:37 ` Stefano Garzarella
2020-12-02 16:18 ` Paraschiv, Andra-Irina [this message]
2020-12-03 8:51 ` Stefano Garzarella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d5c55d2e-5dc3-96f2-2333-37e778c761ae@amazon.com \
--to=andraprs@amazon.com \
--cc=davdunc@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.de \
--cc=jhansen@vmware.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).