From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-173.mta0.migadu.com (out-173.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 032DB3043C7 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 02:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760408971; cv=none; b=HJrdqL2GNaRH/Cup78jEomN0dKBM1eOdv5LABZ9NEim7beHWkgvZoXIeS/YRx3PKPtFHplZAhROcSvvZz0KoFptKu2y5Jwo0zKt8A3r5CckRoM9UxWh4jxPTnvVzguz5m1jLiOsAzPgR4WJ1mIh47kLMlZ3K4hhQSFxbKN+xWUo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760408971; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZsvAZnrUOhK82yhL3P8+glbdzPjfU2fpLzcIr7GBioc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=PCbVe7RmW57d2k5K1p9+raslcYSCfE81DXxiQxOS85PWdYQnw3UeZhtP0YZQy6coC2L+wzVAwvQgl2utt9GVjIPnCRAIQgHIIj80K393wCbbricGUEpKD4Agb8yam0nv+Jl/IrVdbe8ls4hnxneF2APE8hSNxluhq7x6vbblve8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=MBK4mtSG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="MBK4mtSG" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1760408967; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZsvAZnrUOhK82yhL3P8+glbdzPjfU2fpLzcIr7GBioc=; b=MBK4mtSGAfpnw9mB4OPwq1LJSaz9MSGynRRrB2QV21yFRlSl3WfEFdXFNuZJkBrCBI/AOH L7guSjCBaLONJWlUIisjLsPQmN1uBfevyGGQSrfUspXJHU21j7UKXdNv8ThMxiMOSIOVCJ Q8o8gAfNDUXPJda8F9FcrWYC+UqehDQ= Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 10:29:11 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/3] rculist: Add hlist_nulls_replace_rcu() and hlist_nulls_replace_init_rcu() To: Simon Horman Cc: Jason Xing , Jiayuan Chen , Paolo Abeni , kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuniyu@google.com, "Paul E. McKenney" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Xuanqiang Luo , Frederic Weisbecker , Neeraj Upadhyay References: <20250926074033.1548675-1-xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev> <20250926074033.1548675-2-xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev> <71de19ef-6f63-47f5-b5ed-9eaef932439c@linux.dev> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: luoxuanqiang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT 在 2025/10/13 20:08, Simon Horman 写道: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 03:04:34PM +0800, luoxuanqiang wrote: >> 在 2025/10/13 14:26, Jason Xing 写道: >>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 1:36 PM Jiayuan Chen wrote: >>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 11:16:00AM +0800, Paolo Abeni wrote: >>>>> On 9/26/25 9:40 AM, xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev wrote: >>>>>> From: Xuanqiang Luo >>>>>> >>>>>> Add two functions to atomically replace RCU-protected hlist_nulls entries. >>>> [...] >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xuanqiang Luo >>>>> This deserves explicit ack from RCU maintainers. >>>>> >>>>> Since we are finalizing the net-next PR, I suggest to defer this series >>>>> to the next cycle, to avoid rushing such request. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Paolo >>>> Hi maintainers, >>>> >>>> This patch was previously held off due to the merge window. >>>> >>>> Now that the merge net-next has open and no further changes are required, >>>> could we please consider merging it directly? >>>> >>>> Apologies for the slight push, but I'm hoping we can get a formal >>>> commit backported to our production branch. >>> I suppose a new version that needs to be rebased is necessary. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jason >> I’ve rebased the series of patches onto the latest codebase locally and >> didn’t encounter any errors. >> >> If there’s anything else I can do to help get these patches merged, just >> let me know. > Hi, > > The patch-set has been marked as "Deffered" in Patchwork. > Presumably by Paolo in conjunction with his response above. > As such the patch-set needs to be (rebased and) reposted in > order for it to be considered by the maintainers again. > > I think the best practice is for this to happen _after_ one > of the maintainers has sent an "ANN" email announcing that > net-next has re-opened. I don't believe that has happened yet. > > Thanks! Dear Simon, Thanks for the detailed explanation. I think we now know how to handle this kind of situation. net‑next has been reopened, and I have rebased and resent the patch-set. Thanks!