From: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org, willemb@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] ipv6: Honor oif when choosing nexthop for locally generated traffic
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 20:51:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6bf3a67-3629-42ce-b2b3-74482c46fe01@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601065300.267960-2-idosch@nvidia.com>
On 6/1/26 12:52 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Commit 741a11d9e410 ("net: ipv6: Add RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE flag if oif is
> set") made the kernel honor the oif parameter when specified as part of
> output route lookup:
>
> # ip route add 2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy1
> # ip route add ::/0 dev dummy2
> # ip route get 2001:db8:1::1 oif dummy2 fibmatch
> default dev dummy2 metric 1024 pref medium
>
> Due to regression reports, the behavior was partially reverted in commit
> d46a9d678e4c ("net: ipv6: Dont add RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE flag if saddr
> set") to only honor the oif if source address is not specified:
>
> # ip route get 2001:db8:1::1 from 2001:db8:2::1 oif dummy2 fibmatch
> 2001:db8:1::/64 dev dummy1 metric 1024 pref medium
>
> That is, when source address is specified, the kernel will choose the
> most specific route even if its nexthop device does not match the
> specified oif.
>
> This creates a problem for multipath routes. After looking up a route,
> when source address is not specified, the kernel will choose a nexthop
> whose nexthop device matches the specified oif:
>
> # sysctl -wq net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
> # ip route add 2001:db8:10::/64 nexthop via fe80::1 dev dummy1 nexthop via fe80::2 dev dummy2
> # for i in {1..100}; do ip route get 2001:db8:10::${i} oif dummy2; done | grep -o dummy[0-9] | sort | uniq -c
> 100 dummy2
>
> But will disregard the oif when source address is specified despite the
> fact that a matching nexthop exists:
>
> # for i in {1..100}; do ip route get 2001:db8:10::${i} from 2001:db8:2::1 oif dummy2; done | grep -o dummy[0-9] | sort | uniq -c
> 53 dummy1
> 47 dummy2
>
> This behavior differs from IPv4:
>
> # ip address add 192.0.2.1/32 dev lo
> # ip route add 198.51.100.0/24 nexthop via inet6 fe80::1 dev dummy1 nexthop via inet6 fe80::2 dev dummy2
> # for i in {1..100}; do ip route get 198.51.100.${i} from 192.0.2.1 oif dummy2; done | grep -o dummy[0-9] | sort | uniq -c
> 100 dummy2
>
> What happens is that fib6_table_lookup() returns a route with a matching
> nexthop device (assuming it exists):
>
> # perf record -e fib6:fib6_table_lookup -- bash -c "for i in {1..100}; do ip route get 2001:db8:10::${i} from 2001:db8:2::1 oif dummy2; done > /dev/null"
> # perf script | grep -o dummy[0-9] | sort | uniq -c
> 100 dummy2
>
> But it is later overwritten during path selection in fib6_select_path()
> which instead chooses a nexthop according to the calculated hash.
>
> Solve this by telling fib6_select_path() to skip path selection if we
> have an oif match during output route lookup (iif being
> LOOPBACK_IFINDEX).
>
> Behavior after the change:
>
> # sysctl -wq net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
> # ip route add 2001:db8:10::/64 nexthop via fe80::1 dev dummy1 nexthop via fe80::2 dev dummy2
> # for i in {1..100}; do ip route get 2001:db8:10::${i} from 2001:db8:2::1 oif dummy2; done | grep -o dummy[0-9] | sort | uniq -c
> 100 dummy2
>
> Note that enabling forwarding is only needed because we did not add
> neighbor entries for the gateway addresses. When forwarding is disabled
> and CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF is not enabled in kernel config, the kernel
> will treat non-existing neighbor entries as errors and perform
> round-robin between the nexthops:
>
> # sysctl -wq net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=0
> # for i in {1..100}; do ip route get 2001:db8:10::${i} from 2001:db8:2::1 oif dummy2; done | grep -o dummy[0-9] | sort | uniq -c
> 50 dummy1
> 50 dummy2
>
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/route.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-01 6:52 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] ipv6: Honor oif when choosing nexthop for locally generated traffic Ido Schimmel
2026-06-01 6:52 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] " Ido Schimmel
2026-06-02 2:51 ` David Ahern [this message]
2026-06-01 6:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] selftests: fib_tests: Add test cases for route lookup with oif Ido Schimmel
2026-06-02 2:53 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d6bf3a67-3629-42ce-b2b3-74482c46fe01@kernel.org \
--to=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox