From: Jason Lunz <lunz@falooley.org>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: BCM5704 performance questions.
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:03:21 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8c6j9$dv$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1118361376.5838.20.camel@rh4
mchan@broadcom.com said:
> On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 17:38 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>>
>> * Is the BCM5704 chipset/driver really that much slower?
>>
>
> Unfortunately, the 5704 requires the "ONE_DMA" workaround which will
> limit throughput in a PCIX 100/133 bus. If you comment out the line that
> sets the DMA_RWCTRL_ONE_DMA flag in tg3.c, you should see improved
> performance. However, you may run into some DMA issues on certain
> systems.
>
>> * Is there some information on tuning the tg3 somewhere?
>> (I didn't see a Documentation/networking/tg3.txt file, for instance)
>>
>> * Is there a way to verify the bus speed that the NIC is running at?
>> (ethtool -d ethX gives lots of meaningless (to me) hex)
>>
>
> tg3 probing string for each device will tell you the bus type, width,
> and speed.
The patch below from http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/18734
does this too for e1000. Lennert Buytenhek posted it a while back.
Jason
diff -urpN linux-pf/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c linux-bs/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
--- linux-pf/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c Fri Apr 8 15:06:34 2005
+++ linux-bs/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c Fri Apr 8 15:29:34 2005
@@ -617,6 +617,21 @@ e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
if(eeprom_data & eeprom_apme_mask)
adapter->wol |= E1000_WUFC_MAG;
+ /* print bus type/speed/width info */
+ printk(KERN_INFO "%s: e1000 (PCI%s:%s:%s) ", netdev->name,
+ ((adapter->hw.bus_type == e1000_bus_type_pcix) ? "X" : ""),
+ ((adapter->hw.bus_speed == e1000_bus_speed_133) ? "133MHz" :
+ (adapter->hw.bus_speed == e1000_bus_speed_120) ? "120MHz" :
+ (adapter->hw.bus_speed == e1000_bus_speed_100) ? "100MHz" :
+ (adapter->hw.bus_speed == e1000_bus_speed_66) ? "66MHz" :
+ "33MHz"),
+ ((adapter->hw.bus_width == e1000_bus_width_64) ? "64-bit" :
+ "32-bit"));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
+ printk("%2.2x%c", netdev->dev_addr[i],
+ i == 5 ? '\n' : ':');
+
/* reset the hardware with the new settings */
e1000_reset(adapter);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-10 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-10 0:38 BCM5704 performance questions Ben Greear
2005-06-09 23:56 ` Michael Chan
2005-06-10 1:24 ` Ben Greear
2005-06-10 0:37 ` Michael Chan
2005-06-10 21:09 ` Ben Greear
2005-06-10 21:16 ` Michael Chan
2005-06-10 22:35 ` Ben Greear
2005-06-10 22:43 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-10 21:33 ` Rick Jones
2005-06-10 21:56 ` Ben Greear
2005-06-10 22:03 ` Rick Jones
2005-06-10 22:25 ` Ben Greear
2005-06-10 14:03 ` Jason Lunz [this message]
2005-06-10 0:54 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-10 1:20 ` Ben Greear
2005-06-10 1:29 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-10 2:28 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='d8c6j9$dv$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=lunz@falooley.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).