From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, yangyingliang@huawei.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, weiyongjun1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tun: fix use-after-free when register netdev failed
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 10:13:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8eaedf9-321c-1c07-cbd1-de5e1f73b086@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ceeafaf2-6aa4-b815-0b5f-ecc663216f43@redhat.com>
On 2019/8/20 上午10:28, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2019/8/20 上午9:25, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
>> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 21:31:19 +0800
>>
>>> Call tun_attach() after register_netdevice() to make sure tfile->tun
>>> is not published until the netdevice is registered. So the read/write
>>> thread can not use the tun pointer that may freed by free_netdev().
>>> (The tun and dev pointer are allocated by alloc_netdev_mqs(), they can
>>> be freed by netdev_freemem().)
>> register_netdevice() must always be the last operation in the order of
>> network device setup.
>>
>> At the point register_netdevice() is called, the device is visible
>> globally
>> and therefore all of it's software state must be fully initialized and
>> ready for us.
>>
>> You're going to have to find another solution to these problems.
>
>
> The device is loosely coupled with sockets/queues. Each side is
> allowed to be go away without caring the other side. So in this case,
> there's a small window that network stack think the device has one
> queue but actually not, the code can then safely drop them. Maybe it's
> ok here with some comments?
>
> Or if not, we can try to hold the device before tun_attach and drop it
> after register_netdevice().
Hi Yang:
I think maybe we can try to hold refcnt instead of playing real num
queues here. Do you want to post a V4?
Thanks
>
> Thanks
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-22 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-19 13:31 [PATCH v3] tun: fix use-after-free when register netdev failed Yang Yingliang
2019-08-20 1:25 ` David Miller
2019-08-20 2:28 ` Jason Wang
2019-08-22 2:13 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2019-08-22 6:07 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-08-22 12:55 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-08-23 3:05 ` Jason Wang
2019-08-23 9:36 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-09-02 5:32 ` Jason Wang
2019-09-03 1:45 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-09-03 3:03 ` Jason Wang
2019-09-03 5:42 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-09-03 6:06 ` Jason Wang
2019-09-03 7:35 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-09-03 10:50 ` Jason Wang
2019-09-05 2:03 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-09-05 3:10 ` Jason Wang
2019-09-10 2:31 ` Yang Yingliang
2019-09-10 2:36 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8eaedf9-321c-1c07-cbd1-de5e1f73b086@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).