From: Nick Child <nnac123@linux.ibm.com>
To: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] netdev: Enforce index cap in netdev_get_tx_queue
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:01:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d91cbe81-b71e-c20e-3604-7c45966ff5d1@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZBS1OiIsv/ys/FE8@nimitz>
On 3/17/23 13:45, Piotr Raczynski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 01:19:41PM -0500, Nick Child wrote:
>> When requesting a TX queue at a given index, prevent out-of-bounds
>> referencing by ensuring that the index is within the allocated number
>> of queues.
>>
>> If there is an out-of-bounds reference then inform the user and return
>> a reference to the first tx queue instead.
>>
>> Fixes: e8a0464cc950 ("netdev: Allocate multiple queues for TX.")
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Child <nnac123@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/netdevice.h | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> index 23b0d7eaaadd..fe88b1a7393d 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> @@ -2482,6 +2482,13 @@ static inline
>> struct netdev_queue *netdev_get_tx_queue(const struct net_device *dev,
>> unsigned int index)
>> {
>> + if (unlikely(index >= dev->num_tx_queues)) {
>> + net_warn_ratelimited("%s selects TX queue %d, but number of TX queues is %d\n",
>> + dev->name, index,
>> + dev->num_tx_queues);
>> + return &dev->_tx[0];
>
> Why return first queue here instead of NULL, wouldn't that confuse the
> caller instead of return proper (NULL) value?
>
Thanks for reviewing Piotr.
netdev_get_tx_queue has over 300 callers, most of these calls
use the returned queue immediately without any checking on
the returned value. I don't expect all of these callers
to go and add conditionals to handle this case either.
So I opted for the warning message and a valid return value.
That being said, I am open to more opinions.
> Piotr.
>> + }
>> +
>> return &dev->_tx[index];
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.31.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-17 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-17 18:19 [PATCH net 1/2] net: Catch invalid index in XPS mapping Nick Child
2023-03-17 18:19 ` [PATCH net 2/2] netdev: Enforce index cap in netdev_get_tx_queue Nick Child
2023-03-17 18:45 ` Piotr Raczynski
2023-03-17 19:01 ` Nick Child [this message]
2023-03-21 4:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-17 18:37 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: Catch invalid index in XPS mapping Piotr Raczynski
2023-03-21 4:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d91cbe81-b71e-c20e-3604-7c45966ff5d1@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nnac123@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piotr.raczynski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).