From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
To: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-safety@lists.elisa.tech
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: cls_api: remove unneeded local variable in tc_dump_chain()
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 06:59:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d956a5a5-c064-3fd4-5e78-809638ba14ef@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201028113533.26160-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
On 10/28/20 4:35 AM, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> make clang-analyzer on x86_64 defconfig caught my attention with:
>
> net/sched/cls_api.c:2964:3: warning: Value stored to 'parent' is never read
> [clang-analyzer-deadcode.DeadStores]
> parent = 0;
> ^
>
> net/sched/cls_api.c:2977:4: warning: Value stored to 'parent' is never read
> [clang-analyzer-deadcode.DeadStores]
> parent = q->handle;
> ^
>
> Commit 32a4f5ecd738 ("net: sched: introduce chain object to uapi")
> introduced tc_dump_chain() and this initial implementation already
> contained these unneeded dead stores.
>
> Simplify the code to make clang-analyzer happy.
>
> As compilers will detect these unneeded assignments and optimize this
> anyway, the resulting binary is identical before and after this change.
>
> No functional change. No change in object code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
> ---
> applies cleanly on current master and next-20201028
>
> Jamal, Cong, Jiri, please ack.
> David, Jakub, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch.
>
> net/sched/cls_api.c | 16 +++-------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> index faeabff283a2..8ce830ca5f92 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> @@ -2940,7 +2940,6 @@ static int tc_dump_chain(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> struct tcf_chain *chain;
> long index_start;
> long index;
> - u32 parent;
> int err;
>
> if (nlmsg_len(cb->nlh) < sizeof(*tcm))
> @@ -2955,13 +2954,6 @@ static int tc_dump_chain(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> block = tcf_block_refcnt_get(net, tcm->tcm_block_index);
> if (!block)
> goto out;
> - /* If we work with block index, q is NULL and parent value
> - * will never be used in the following code. The check
> - * in tcf_fill_node prevents it. However, compiler does not
> - * see that far, so set parent to zero to silence the warning
> - * about parent being uninitialized.
> - */
> - parent = 0;
> } else {
> const struct Qdisc_class_ops *cops;
> struct net_device *dev;
> @@ -2971,13 +2963,11 @@ static int tc_dump_chain(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
> if (!dev)
> return skb->len;
>
> - parent = tcm->tcm_parent;
> - if (!parent) {
> + if (!tcm->tcm_parent)
> q = dev->qdisc;
> - parent = q->handle;
This looks like a an unused error handler.
and the later call to
if (TC_H_MIN(tcm->tcm_parent)
maybe should be
if (TC_H_MIN(parent))
so I am skeptical that this change is ok because the code around it looks buggy.
Tom
> - } else {
> + else
> q = qdisc_lookup(dev, TC_H_MAJ(tcm->tcm_parent));
> - }
> +
> if (!q)
> goto out;
> cops = q->ops->cl_ops;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-29 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-28 11:35 [PATCH] net: cls_api: remove unneeded local variable in tc_dump_chain() Lukas Bulwahn
2020-10-28 13:59 ` Tom Rix [this message]
2020-10-28 15:50 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-10-28 17:38 ` Cong Wang
2020-10-30 21:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d956a5a5-c064-3fd4-5e78-809638ba14ef@redhat.com \
--to=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-safety@lists.elisa.tech \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox