From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@shawell.net>,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>,
Andre Edich <andre.edich@microchip.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>,
Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>,
Gabriel Hojda <ghojda@yo2urs.ro>,
Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@googlemail.com>,
Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>,
Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@kunbus.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
'Linux Samsung SOC' <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Forward PHY interrupts to PHY driver to avoid polling
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 13:41:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d963b1a3-e18d-25d5-f07c-42d17d382174@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220918191333.GA2107@wunner.de>
On 9/18/2022 12:13 PM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> [cc += Florian]
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 01:40:05PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> I've finally traced what has happened. I've double checked and indeed
>> the 1758bde2e4aa commit fixed the issue on next-20220516 kernel and as
>> such it has been merged to linus tree. Then the commit 744d23c71af3
>> ("net: phy: Warn about incorrect mdio_bus_phy_resume() state") has been
>> merged to linus tree, which triggers a new warning during the
>> suspend/resume cycle with smsc95xx driver. Please note, that the
>> smsc95xx still works fine regardless that warning. However it look that
>> the commit 1758bde2e4aa only hide a real problem, which the commit
>> 744d23c71af3 warns about.
>>
>> Probably a proper fix for smsc95xx driver is to call phy_stop/start
>> during suspend/resume cycle, like in similar patches for other drivers:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220825023951.3220-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com/
>
> No, smsc95xx.c relies on mdio_bus_phy_{suspend,resume}() and there's
> no need to call phy_{stop,start}() >
> 744d23c71af3 was flawed and 6dbe852c379f has already fixed a portion
> of the fallout.
>
> However the WARN() condition still seems too broad and causes false
> positives such as in your case. In particular, mdio_bus_phy_suspend()
> may leave the device in PHY_UP state, so that's a legal state that
> needs to be exempted from the WARN().
How is that a legal state when the PHY should be suspended? Even if we
are interrupt driven, the state machine should be stopped, does not mean
that Wake-on-LAN or other activity interrupts should be disabled.
>
> Does the issue still appear even after 6dbe852c379f?
>
> If it does, could you test whether exempting PHY_UP silences the
> gratuitous WARN splat? I.e.:
If you allow PHY_UP, then the warning becomes effectively useless, so I
don't believe this is quite what you want to do here.
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-18 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-12 8:42 [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] Polling be gone on LAN95xx Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/7] usbnet: Run unregister_netdev() before unbind() again Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Don't clear read-only PHY interrupt Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 11:57 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Don't reset PHY behind PHY driver's back Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 12:12 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Avoid link settings race on interrupt reception Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 12:15 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/7] usbnet: smsc95xx: Forward PHY interrupts to PHY driver to avoid polling Lukas Wunner
[not found] ` <CGME20220517101846eucas1p2c132f7e7032ed00996e222e9cc6cdf99@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2022-05-17 10:18 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-05-19 19:08 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-19 21:22 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-05-23 9:43 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-23 11:38 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-05-23 12:34 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-05-23 13:47 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-24 0:52 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-05-24 1:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-05-24 6:16 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-05-24 12:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-05-26 13:55 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-24 12:13 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-06-06 1:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-08-26 6:51 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-26 7:19 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-08-26 7:41 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-26 7:53 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-08-26 8:29 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-29 11:40 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-09-18 19:13 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-09-18 20:41 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2022-09-18 20:55 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-09-18 22:11 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-09-23 4:20 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-09-22 13:21 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-05-12 8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/7] net: phy: smsc: Cache interrupt mask Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 12:17 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 8:42 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/7] net: phy: smsc: Cope with hot-removal in interrupt handler Lukas Wunner
2022-05-12 12:19 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-05-13 10:40 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] Polling be gone on LAN95xx patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d963b1a3-e18d-25d5-f07c-42d17d382174@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andre.edich@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=chf.fritz@googlemail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fntoth@gmail.com \
--cc=ghojda@yo2urs.ro \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=martyn.welch@collabora.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=p.rosenberger@kunbus.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=steve.glendinning@shawell.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).