From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A71C35247 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D9520674 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=6wind.com header.i=@6wind.com header.b="VCoSqLh3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727468AbgBEQ7r (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:59:47 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:43717 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726678AbgBEQ7r (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:59:47 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id z9so3600473wrs.10 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 08:59:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind.com; s=google; h=reply-to:subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=glnjeYfj7CXlX0oXqWEDa4SaRTPpERU3X53s2vCGPQ4=; b=VCoSqLh3L/8hiOY3N11IlILO/6cKk6FBagfOy/4gZC2SH42xU9wJ2DTDhPw858MJyn EyWLWkYgXpqfY+uWkoMlqyaYOs+UH3i++WkBvfpG7bjYdwBPJp+HrQDw2mFRcAYWnJrv XpYlOAeazsg4wGqng15teriCEEggXcJhfPDIA3dT97xZbjJD+iKQ2XMoAz3C43WWWxaV 0bt8NUw5B9mCqcWOTsU46w78nsMY1L73gLQG+FtFHR7HMxWGCyzmbV6tW88i7LSXDlZK i8+f8oz5kBLtdxwfg5s26QeXYCZOv2ETNEJHB9QBJOQRqT68FTNMvG3v9yT9Xf16Qcls uPcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=glnjeYfj7CXlX0oXqWEDa4SaRTPpERU3X53s2vCGPQ4=; b=hDDn7jH5p0oQuBAsIoJD/9FCPySd8iGkW+mhpEkHpi9Q8sb4rcOBu7n57wDHj08fDB qfeeKQpQh56lq53qKaNov1aaQxXwTm7eofItAJt7uFan+CyTLhfiUsR8rZWSIykPsz/1 Cp6OGEcHF+D5nftbfP95Pqh2zsaOu/EHt0F5iymveA+K1RKlBUAI2jrLnCxIqCALRSzU map6N9avxgc7s1NYEUKWwjm3ZxN9BQDlNOLyk8mkJMQnA982kSdrkx/rBVccYlhEv4cv qhjgw+kjpkhr07IA56uFHy5HGuL65Rk8BadDnn1TiDl6IR9dEShwXq4vOolOJ3XNi5V3 1nbw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXu573YgCA8RWkplZzxQhz6Ldew+SSCBTGqyzpOthuPY1tNKzVU O3ZsupUrU0AzGlwVuz7zPBWzqNKToJU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyCYmOe8ai+/q3XF/PlgoUKM2Gnw1aO5N53sM/U49IXDKLDWHCu7eBIwgCtU5ggQ57Tp4dyjA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e9c5:: with SMTP id l5mr28982438wrn.322.1580921984764; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 08:59:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e0a:410:bb00:9c0f:f129:76a:d5c? ([2a01:e0a:410:bb00:9c0f:f129:76a:d5c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a184sm201957wmf.29.2020.02.05.08.59.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Feb 2020 08:59:44 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net, ip6_tunnel: enhance tunnel locate with type check To: William Dauchy , netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <563334a2-8b5d-a80b-30ef-085fdaa2d1a8@6wind.com> <20200205162934.220154-3-w.dauchy@criteo.com> From: Nicolas Dichtel Organization: 6WIND Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 17:59:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200205162934.220154-3-w.dauchy@criteo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Le 05/02/2020 à 17:29, William Dauchy a écrit : > As it is done in ip_tunnel, compare dev->type when trying to locate an > existing tunnel. Can you elaborate? What problem does this solve? Which tree are you targeting? net or net-next?