From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D47C448B9B; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:21:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789125701; cv=none; b=OSFJ0FYgF0Xnt73ezIzU1+55cYrWiydTJDWfY9wRnBpWpRcK5dr2Bj5wqTsgdaPh0yefv3osefdDpK6vCp2Fd0kaFf2mRItfpLgsLseu/fAzmdYKiJCjEmaQZXqrBv/sPFHcf8LX2urBXCv5lbYKIvEZnSzfpx9Et2hXZkV58AA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789125701; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6l3tE5aukaRa0TamsHqAwe5puMIZo+63hnCL9DOeEoc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=moyIbV+tih++54+ldRnA4OVm7gkswRsY2oYdMsQr4dplbvM5EeDzGlNhjwU/10ZFy7g8QI3aYwbktleWWUuvYCwAsEfjAaqvEDRuRZ8RjXhRbo+oL8zZEXpnTKleNdG1cJcb8etvEyfWMwPRyxeG/HBhmfSKvu8oL13kiq/LINU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SOweOnv9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SOweOnv9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E78891F00898; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:21:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789125695; bh=MrfAa/ncpVuU+jlyo05m6FyiXPJKkQEJEUser5JwTrM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=SOweOnv9/+KvhKPXlomeIVdlWi62on6wJyU7pmYHjBqp6x6HcJU4/M97UIS0pQ2vv 5idnLfsZ2Z2sEV8i3B9Kp3wadmTLt3s6lzTGZND7VPY3gyNwjp/Brr/jHWX/NMm0RD 1ioC/0p+SC7wllnCuhAlOFf0A1Wu4o8dVZwUQ/yHkY48WhVrfNqOTAna/T1beDolv0 5X+vOtRpVWYMtphyk68sru7E/Oo+84KDip5wVIHLx4vCq5tDtCH1O7+UfrrfVp3ppN ginB7sgRh7zfj2G+cX4KGfKhd1YpxfHihRpHDOOGQeHP8xd9ikAH++AlwKsihEBgNg IaEgFfoMKTOGQ== From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Andrey Ignatov Cc: Sasha Levin , Thomas Petazzoni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yinhao Hu , Kaiyan Mei , Dongliang Mu , "Miguel Gazquez (Schneider Electric)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15.y] bpf: Enforce expected_attach_type for tailcall compatibility Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 07:20:54 -0400 Message-ID: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260910-cve-2025-40123-5-15-v1-1-547774d4a00b@bootlin.com> References: <20260910-cve-2025-40123-5-15-v1-1-547774d4a00b@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > [ Upstream commit 4540aed51b12bc13364149bf95f6ecef013197c0 ] > > Yinhao et al. recently reported: > > Our fuzzer tool discovered an uninitialized pointer issue in the > bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() function within the Linux kernel's BPF > subsystem. Queued for 5.15, thanks. -- Thanks, Sasha