netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: properly init chain in case of multiple control actions
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 17:23:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbb93ac2c87c14d412a18f35701890dcc87d0cdb.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpUrQTX25c2ujbHu2O0dSiTzwuc8ms-cbiUo=bUz1Xgcug@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 13:57 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> Why not just validate the fallback action in each action init()?
> For example, checking tcfg_paction in tcf_gact_init().
> 
> I don't see the need of making it generic.

hello Cong, once again thanks for looking at this.

what you say is doable, and I evaluated doing it before proposing this
patch.

But I felt unconfortable, because I needed to pass struct tcf_proto *tp in
tcf_gact_init() to initialize a->goto_chain with the chain_idx encoded in
the fallback action. So, I would have changed all the init() functions in
all TC actions, just to fix two of them.

A (legal?) trick  is to let tcf_action store the fallback action when it
contains a 'goto chain' command, I just posted a proposal for gact. If you
think it's ok, I will test and post the same for act_police.

regards,
-- 
davide

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-13 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-12 20:39 [PATCH net] net/sched: properly init chain in case of multiple control actions Davide Caratti
2018-10-12 20:57 ` Cong Wang
2018-10-13 15:23   ` Davide Caratti [this message]
2018-10-14 13:46     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2018-10-14 14:14       ` Davide Caratti
2018-10-15 18:31     ` Cong Wang
2018-10-16 17:38       ` Davide Caratti
2018-10-18  5:35         ` Cong Wang
2018-10-18  8:38           ` Davide Caratti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dbb93ac2c87c14d412a18f35701890dcc87d0cdb.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=dcaratti@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).