From: "Dahan, AvigailX" <avigailx.dahan@intel.com>
To: Agalakov Daniil <ade@amicon.ru>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lvc-project@linuxtesting.org>,
Daniil Iskhakov <dish@amicon.ru>, Roman Razov <rrv@amicon.ru>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] e1000e: limit endianness conversion to boundary words
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:14:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dcdef685-6a8c-4365-868b-d448e05e4780@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401120919.282668-3-ade@amicon.ru>
On 01/04/2026 15:08, Agalakov Daniil wrote:
> [Why]
> In e1000_set_eeprom(), the eeprom_buff is allocated to hold a range of
> words. However, only the boundary words (the first and the last) are
> populated from the EEPROM if the write request is not word-aligned.
> The words in the middle of the buffer remain uninitialized because they
> are intended to be completely overwritten by the new data via memcpy().
>
> The previous implementation had a loop that performed le16_to_cpus()
> on the entire buffer. This resulted in endianness conversion being
> performed on uninitialized memory for all interior words.
>
> Fix this by converting the endianness only for the boundary words
> immediately after they are successfully read from the EEPROM.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Co-developed-by: Iskhakov Daniil <dish@amicon.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Iskhakov Daniil <dish@amicon.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Agalakov Daniil <ade@amicon.ru>
> ---
> v3:
> - Reverted to v1's "check-then-convert" logic: the return value of
> e1000_read_nvm() is now checked before performing le16_to_cpus().
> - Removed the redundant full-buffer loops that caused double endianness
> conversion in v2.
>
> v2:
> - Split from the original bugfix series and targeted at 'net-next'.
> - Removed the Fixes: tag; limiting the conversion scope is an
> improvement to avoid unnecessary processing of uninitialized memory.
> - Improved commit description for clarity.
> - Note on e1000e: this driver already contains the necessary return
> value checks for EEPROM reads, so only the endianness conversion
> cleanup is included for e1000e.
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
Tested-by: Avigail Dahan <avigailx.dahan@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-18 12:05 [PATCH net 0/3] e1000/e1000e: fix uninitialized memory access in EEPROM write Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-18 12:05 ` [PATCH net 1/3] e1000: check return value of e1000_read_eeprom Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-18 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-03-18 12:05 ` [PATCH net 2/3] e1000: fix endianness conversion of uninitialized words Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-18 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-03-24 23:26 ` Tony Nguyen
2026-03-25 15:19 ` Fedor Pchelkin
2026-03-25 23:01 ` Jacob Keller
2026-03-29 16:02 ` Fedor Pchelkin
2026-03-30 14:46 ` Jacob Keller
2026-03-18 12:05 ` [PATCH net 3/3] e1000e: " Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-18 15:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-03-24 23:27 ` Tony Nguyen
2026-03-25 15:02 ` [PATCH net v2] e1000: check return value of e1000_read_eeprom Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-25 15:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-03-25 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] e1000/e1000e: limit endianness conversion to boundary words Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-25 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] e1000: " Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-26 7:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-03-25 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] e1000e: " Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-26 7:28 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-03-31 20:57 ` Tony Nguyen
2026-04-01 12:08 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] e1000/e1000e: " Agalakov Daniil
2026-04-01 12:08 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] e1000: " Agalakov Daniil
2026-04-01 12:08 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] e1000e: " Agalakov Daniil
2026-04-15 8:14 ` Dahan, AvigailX [this message]
2026-04-01 12:25 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] e1000/e1000e: " Fedor Pchelkin
2026-03-25 16:00 ` [PATCH net v3] e1000: check return value of e1000_read_eeprom Agalakov Daniil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dcdef685-6a8c-4365-868b-d448e05e4780@intel.com \
--to=avigailx.dahan@intel.com \
--cc=ade@amicon.ru \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dish@amicon.ru \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=rrv@amicon.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox