From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Justin Mattock" Subject: Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG: wifi0: transmit timed out Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:48:17 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20080525112308.03a5fda7.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com> <20080729215315.5a505fe7.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com> <20080729065859.2bcc65ed@infradead.org> <20080729.134706.249036102.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: arjan@infradead.org, komurojun-mbn@nifty.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "David Miller" Return-path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.244]:14216 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755556AbYG2WsS (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:48:18 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d40so17552and.103 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:48:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080729.134706.249036102.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 1:47 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Arjan van de Ven > Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:58:59 -0700 > >> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:53:15 +0900 >> Komuro wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > Please try to comment out the "WARN_ON_ONCE" >> > at net/sched/sched_generic.c. >> > >> >> "I have a hardware failure so I'll comment out the message that says >> so, and then I won't have a failure". Yeah that'll work well. > > Yes, this is indeed a recidulious suggestion, to hide the problem > instead of trying to figure out what it might actually be. > > Komuro has a serious problem accepting the fact that this condition is > in fact an abnormal error should should be logged, and he keeps > pushing to get this WARN_ON() removed over and over again. > > I'm just ignoring him at this point. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > I should of mentioned the madwifi module I've been using is from february, so maybe madwifi took care of this already. As for experimanting with ath9k I pulled yesterday and compiled, but from what I saw ath9k seems to not handle wpa keys that well. so back to madwifi until later on. -- Justin P. Mattock