From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf: move bpf csum flag check
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 23:53:10 +0100
Message-ID: <dd2e1d1e-27aa-da8d-30ed-263dc8e7703d@iogearbox.net>
References: <1512425909-105242-1-git-send-email-u9012063@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:53626 "EHLO
        www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751788AbdLDWxM (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:53:12 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1512425909-105242-1-git-send-email-u9012063@gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On 12/04/2017 11:18 PM, William Tu wrote:
> trivial move the BPF_F_ZERO_CSUM_TX check right below the
> 'flags & BPF_F_DONT_FRAGMENT', so common tun_flags handling
> is logically together.
> 
> Signed-off-by: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

Applied to bpf-next, thanks William.