* [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect
@ 2025-07-30 20:23 Heiner Kallweit
2025-07-31 8:58 ` Dawid Osuchowski
2025-08-05 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2025-07-30 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn, Simon Horman, Jakub Kicinski, David Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni
Cc: Jacky Chou, Jacob Keller, netdev@vger.kernel.org
After the call to phy_disconnect() netdev->phydev is reset to NULL.
So fixed_phy_unregister() would be called with a NULL pointer as argument.
Therefore cache the phy_device before this call.
Fixes: e24a6c874601 ("net: ftgmac100: Get link speed and duplex for NC-SI")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c
index 5d0c09068..a863f7841 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c
@@ -1750,16 +1750,17 @@ static int ftgmac100_setup_mdio(struct net_device *netdev)
static void ftgmac100_phy_disconnect(struct net_device *netdev)
{
struct ftgmac100 *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
+ struct phy_device *phydev = netdev->phydev;
- if (!netdev->phydev)
+ if (!phydev)
return;
- phy_disconnect(netdev->phydev);
+ phy_disconnect(phydev);
if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node))
of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node);
if (priv->use_ncsi)
- fixed_phy_unregister(netdev->phydev);
+ fixed_phy_unregister(phydev);
}
static void ftgmac100_destroy_mdio(struct net_device *netdev)
--
2.50.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect
2025-07-30 20:23 [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect Heiner Kallweit
@ 2025-07-31 8:58 ` Dawid Osuchowski
2025-07-31 19:22 ` Heiner Kallweit
2025-08-05 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dawid Osuchowski @ 2025-07-31 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiner Kallweit, Andrew Lunn, Simon Horman, Jakub Kicinski,
David Miller, Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni
Cc: Jacky Chou, Jacob Keller, netdev@vger.kernel.org
On 2025-07-30 10:23 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> After the call to phy_disconnect() netdev->phydev is reset to NULL.
phy_disconnect() in its flow does not set phydev to NULL, if anywhere it
happens in of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(), which already calls
fixed_phy_unregister() before setting phydev to NULL
From my understanding (which very much could be wrong) of
ftgmac100_probe(), these two cases are mutually exclusive. The device
either uses NCSI or will use a phy based on the DT "fixed-link" property
> So fixed_phy_unregister() would be called with a NULL pointer as argument.
Given my analysis above, I don't think this case is possible.
Best regards,
Dawid
> Therefore cache the phy_device before this call.
>
> Fixes: e24a6c874601 ("net: ftgmac100: Get link speed and duplex for NC-SI")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c
> index 5d0c09068..a863f7841 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c
> @@ -1750,16 +1750,17 @@ static int ftgmac100_setup_mdio(struct net_device *netdev)
> static void ftgmac100_phy_disconnect(struct net_device *netdev)
> {
> struct ftgmac100 *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
> + struct phy_device *phydev = netdev->phydev;
>
> - if (!netdev->phydev)
> + if (!phydev)
> return;
>
> - phy_disconnect(netdev->phydev);
> + phy_disconnect(phydev);
> if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node))
> of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node);
>
> if (priv->use_ncsi)
> - fixed_phy_unregister(netdev->phydev);
> + fixed_phy_unregister(phydev);
> }
>
> static void ftgmac100_destroy_mdio(struct net_device *netdev)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect
2025-07-31 8:58 ` Dawid Osuchowski
@ 2025-07-31 19:22 ` Heiner Kallweit
2025-08-01 6:19 ` Dawid Osuchowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2025-07-31 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dawid Osuchowski, Andrew Lunn, Simon Horman, Jakub Kicinski,
David Miller, Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni
Cc: Jacky Chou, Jacob Keller, netdev@vger.kernel.org
On 7/31/2025 10:58 AM, Dawid Osuchowski wrote:
> On 2025-07-30 10:23 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> After the call to phy_disconnect() netdev->phydev is reset to NULL.
>
> phy_disconnect() in its flow does not set phydev to NULL, if anywhere it happens in of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(), which already calls fixed_phy_unregister() before setting phydev to NULL
I can't follow this argumentation. Look at phy_detach(), there we have:
if (phydev->attached_dev)
phydev->attached_dev->phydev = NULL;
So netdev->phydev is NULL after the call to phy_disconnect, provided that the PHY was attached to the netdev before.
If use_ncsi is true, then fixed_phy_unregister() will be called with a NULL argument.
This is independent of whether of_phy_is_fixed_link() is true or not.
Very likely it's false in the NCSI case.
>
> From my understanding (which very much could be wrong) of ftgmac100_probe(), these two cases are mutually exclusive. The device either uses NCSI or will use a phy based on the DT "fixed-link" property
>> So fixed_phy_unregister() would be called with a NULL pointer as argument.
>
> Given my analysis above, I don't think this case is possible.
>
> Best regards,
> Dawid
>> Therefore cache the phy_device before this call.
>>
>> Fixes: e24a6c874601 ("net: ftgmac100: Get link speed and duplex for NC-SI")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c | 7 ++++---
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c
>> index 5d0c09068..a863f7841 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c
>> @@ -1750,16 +1750,17 @@ static int ftgmac100_setup_mdio(struct net_device *netdev)
>> static void ftgmac100_phy_disconnect(struct net_device *netdev)
>> {
>> struct ftgmac100 *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
>> + struct phy_device *phydev = netdev->phydev;
>> - if (!netdev->phydev)
>> + if (!phydev)
>> return;
>> - phy_disconnect(netdev->phydev);
>> + phy_disconnect(phydev);
>> if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node))
>> of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node);
>> if (priv->use_ncsi)
>> - fixed_phy_unregister(netdev->phydev);
>> + fixed_phy_unregister(phydev);
>> }
>> static void ftgmac100_destroy_mdio(struct net_device *netdev)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect
2025-07-31 19:22 ` Heiner Kallweit
@ 2025-08-01 6:19 ` Dawid Osuchowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dawid Osuchowski @ 2025-08-01 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiner Kallweit, Andrew Lunn, Simon Horman, Jakub Kicinski,
David Miller, Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni
Cc: Jacky Chou, Jacob Keller, netdev@vger.kernel.org
On 2025-07-31 9:22 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 7/31/2025 10:58 AM, Dawid Osuchowski wrote:
>> On 2025-07-30 10:23 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> After the call to phy_disconnect() netdev->phydev is reset to NULL.
>>
>> phy_disconnect() in its flow does not set phydev to NULL, if anywhere it happens in of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(), which already calls fixed_phy_unregister() before setting phydev to NULL
>
> I can't follow this argumentation. Look at phy_detach(), there we have:
> if (phydev->attached_dev)
> phydev->attached_dev->phydev = NULL;
> So netdev->phydev is NULL after the call to phy_disconnect, provided that the PHY was attached to the netdev before.
> If use_ncsi is true, then fixed_phy_unregister() will be called with a NULL argument.
You are absolutely correct. Somehow I missed that and I apologize for
the confusion on my side.
With that cleared up:
Reviewed-by: Dawid Osuchowski <dawid.osuchowski@linux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Dawid
>
> This is independent of whether of_phy_is_fixed_link() is true or not.
> Very likely it's false in the NCSI case.
>
>>
>> From my understanding (which very much could be wrong) of ftgmac100_probe(), these two cases are mutually exclusive. The device either uses NCSI or will use a phy based on the DT "fixed-link" property
>
>>> So fixed_phy_unregister() would be called with a NULL pointer as argument.
>>
>> Given my analysis above, I don't think this case is possible.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dawid
>>> Therefore cache the phy_device before this call.
>>>
>>> Fixes: e24a6c874601 ("net: ftgmac100: Get link speed and duplex for NC-SI")
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c | 7 ++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c
>>> index 5d0c09068..a863f7841 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c
>>> @@ -1750,16 +1750,17 @@ static int ftgmac100_setup_mdio(struct net_device *netdev)
>>> static void ftgmac100_phy_disconnect(struct net_device *netdev)
>>> {
>>> struct ftgmac100 *priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>> + struct phy_device *phydev = netdev->phydev;
>>> - if (!netdev->phydev)
>>> + if (!phydev)
>>> return;
>>> - phy_disconnect(netdev->phydev);
>>> + phy_disconnect(phydev);
>>> if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node))
>>> of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node);
>>> if (priv->use_ncsi)
>>> - fixed_phy_unregister(netdev->phydev);
>>> + fixed_phy_unregister(phydev);
>>> }
>>> static void ftgmac100_destroy_mdio(struct net_device *netdev)
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect
2025-07-30 20:23 [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect Heiner Kallweit
2025-07-31 8:58 ` Dawid Osuchowski
@ 2025-08-05 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2025-08-05 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiner Kallweit
Cc: andrew+netdev, horms, kuba, davem, edumazet, pabeni, jacky_chou,
jacob.e.keller, netdev
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:23:23 +0200 you wrote:
> After the call to phy_disconnect() netdev->phydev is reset to NULL.
> So fixed_phy_unregister() would be called with a NULL pointer as argument.
> Therefore cache the phy_device before this call.
>
> Fixes: e24a6c874601 ("net: ftgmac100: Get link speed and duplex for NC-SI")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/e88fbc30dda1
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-05 23:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-30 20:23 [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect Heiner Kallweit
2025-07-31 8:58 ` Dawid Osuchowski
2025-07-31 19:22 ` Heiner Kallweit
2025-08-01 6:19 ` Dawid Osuchowski
2025-08-05 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).