* [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect @ 2025-07-30 20:23 Heiner Kallweit 2025-07-31 8:58 ` Dawid Osuchowski 2025-08-05 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2025-07-30 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Lunn, Simon Horman, Jakub Kicinski, David Miller, Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni Cc: Jacky Chou, Jacob Keller, netdev@vger.kernel.org After the call to phy_disconnect() netdev->phydev is reset to NULL. So fixed_phy_unregister() would be called with a NULL pointer as argument. Therefore cache the phy_device before this call. Fixes: e24a6c874601 ("net: ftgmac100: Get link speed and duplex for NC-SI") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c index 5d0c09068..a863f7841 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c @@ -1750,16 +1750,17 @@ static int ftgmac100_setup_mdio(struct net_device *netdev) static void ftgmac100_phy_disconnect(struct net_device *netdev) { struct ftgmac100 *priv = netdev_priv(netdev); + struct phy_device *phydev = netdev->phydev; - if (!netdev->phydev) + if (!phydev) return; - phy_disconnect(netdev->phydev); + phy_disconnect(phydev); if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node)) of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node); if (priv->use_ncsi) - fixed_phy_unregister(netdev->phydev); + fixed_phy_unregister(phydev); } static void ftgmac100_destroy_mdio(struct net_device *netdev) -- 2.50.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect 2025-07-30 20:23 [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect Heiner Kallweit @ 2025-07-31 8:58 ` Dawid Osuchowski 2025-07-31 19:22 ` Heiner Kallweit 2025-08-05 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Dawid Osuchowski @ 2025-07-31 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Heiner Kallweit, Andrew Lunn, Simon Horman, Jakub Kicinski, David Miller, Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni Cc: Jacky Chou, Jacob Keller, netdev@vger.kernel.org On 2025-07-30 10:23 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > After the call to phy_disconnect() netdev->phydev is reset to NULL. phy_disconnect() in its flow does not set phydev to NULL, if anywhere it happens in of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(), which already calls fixed_phy_unregister() before setting phydev to NULL From my understanding (which very much could be wrong) of ftgmac100_probe(), these two cases are mutually exclusive. The device either uses NCSI or will use a phy based on the DT "fixed-link" property > So fixed_phy_unregister() would be called with a NULL pointer as argument. Given my analysis above, I don't think this case is possible. Best regards, Dawid > Therefore cache the phy_device before this call. > > Fixes: e24a6c874601 ("net: ftgmac100: Get link speed and duplex for NC-SI") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c > index 5d0c09068..a863f7841 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c > @@ -1750,16 +1750,17 @@ static int ftgmac100_setup_mdio(struct net_device *netdev) > static void ftgmac100_phy_disconnect(struct net_device *netdev) > { > struct ftgmac100 *priv = netdev_priv(netdev); > + struct phy_device *phydev = netdev->phydev; > > - if (!netdev->phydev) > + if (!phydev) > return; > > - phy_disconnect(netdev->phydev); > + phy_disconnect(phydev); > if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node)) > of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node); > > if (priv->use_ncsi) > - fixed_phy_unregister(netdev->phydev); > + fixed_phy_unregister(phydev); > } > > static void ftgmac100_destroy_mdio(struct net_device *netdev) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect 2025-07-31 8:58 ` Dawid Osuchowski @ 2025-07-31 19:22 ` Heiner Kallweit 2025-08-01 6:19 ` Dawid Osuchowski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2025-07-31 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dawid Osuchowski, Andrew Lunn, Simon Horman, Jakub Kicinski, David Miller, Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni Cc: Jacky Chou, Jacob Keller, netdev@vger.kernel.org On 7/31/2025 10:58 AM, Dawid Osuchowski wrote: > On 2025-07-30 10:23 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> After the call to phy_disconnect() netdev->phydev is reset to NULL. > > phy_disconnect() in its flow does not set phydev to NULL, if anywhere it happens in of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(), which already calls fixed_phy_unregister() before setting phydev to NULL I can't follow this argumentation. Look at phy_detach(), there we have: if (phydev->attached_dev) phydev->attached_dev->phydev = NULL; So netdev->phydev is NULL after the call to phy_disconnect, provided that the PHY was attached to the netdev before. If use_ncsi is true, then fixed_phy_unregister() will be called with a NULL argument. This is independent of whether of_phy_is_fixed_link() is true or not. Very likely it's false in the NCSI case. > > From my understanding (which very much could be wrong) of ftgmac100_probe(), these two cases are mutually exclusive. The device either uses NCSI or will use a phy based on the DT "fixed-link" property >> So fixed_phy_unregister() would be called with a NULL pointer as argument. > > Given my analysis above, I don't think this case is possible. > > Best regards, > Dawid >> Therefore cache the phy_device before this call. >> >> Fixes: e24a6c874601 ("net: ftgmac100: Get link speed and duplex for NC-SI") >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c | 7 ++++--- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c >> index 5d0c09068..a863f7841 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c >> @@ -1750,16 +1750,17 @@ static int ftgmac100_setup_mdio(struct net_device *netdev) >> static void ftgmac100_phy_disconnect(struct net_device *netdev) >> { >> struct ftgmac100 *priv = netdev_priv(netdev); >> + struct phy_device *phydev = netdev->phydev; >> - if (!netdev->phydev) >> + if (!phydev) >> return; >> - phy_disconnect(netdev->phydev); >> + phy_disconnect(phydev); >> if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node)) >> of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node); >> if (priv->use_ncsi) >> - fixed_phy_unregister(netdev->phydev); >> + fixed_phy_unregister(phydev); >> } >> static void ftgmac100_destroy_mdio(struct net_device *netdev) > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect 2025-07-31 19:22 ` Heiner Kallweit @ 2025-08-01 6:19 ` Dawid Osuchowski 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Dawid Osuchowski @ 2025-08-01 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Heiner Kallweit, Andrew Lunn, Simon Horman, Jakub Kicinski, David Miller, Eric Dumazet, Paolo Abeni Cc: Jacky Chou, Jacob Keller, netdev@vger.kernel.org On 2025-07-31 9:22 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > On 7/31/2025 10:58 AM, Dawid Osuchowski wrote: >> On 2025-07-30 10:23 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >>> After the call to phy_disconnect() netdev->phydev is reset to NULL. >> >> phy_disconnect() in its flow does not set phydev to NULL, if anywhere it happens in of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(), which already calls fixed_phy_unregister() before setting phydev to NULL > > I can't follow this argumentation. Look at phy_detach(), there we have: > if (phydev->attached_dev) > phydev->attached_dev->phydev = NULL; > So netdev->phydev is NULL after the call to phy_disconnect, provided that the PHY was attached to the netdev before. > If use_ncsi is true, then fixed_phy_unregister() will be called with a NULL argument. You are absolutely correct. Somehow I missed that and I apologize for the confusion on my side. With that cleared up: Reviewed-by: Dawid Osuchowski <dawid.osuchowski@linux.intel.com> Thanks, Dawid > > This is independent of whether of_phy_is_fixed_link() is true or not. > Very likely it's false in the NCSI case. > >> >> From my understanding (which very much could be wrong) of ftgmac100_probe(), these two cases are mutually exclusive. The device either uses NCSI or will use a phy based on the DT "fixed-link" property > >>> So fixed_phy_unregister() would be called with a NULL pointer as argument. >> >> Given my analysis above, I don't think this case is possible. >> >> Best regards, >> Dawid >>> Therefore cache the phy_device before this call. >>> >>> Fixes: e24a6c874601 ("net: ftgmac100: Get link speed and duplex for NC-SI") >>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c | 7 ++++--- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c >>> index 5d0c09068..a863f7841 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c >>> @@ -1750,16 +1750,17 @@ static int ftgmac100_setup_mdio(struct net_device *netdev) >>> static void ftgmac100_phy_disconnect(struct net_device *netdev) >>> { >>> struct ftgmac100 *priv = netdev_priv(netdev); >>> + struct phy_device *phydev = netdev->phydev; >>> - if (!netdev->phydev) >>> + if (!phydev) >>> return; >>> - phy_disconnect(netdev->phydev); >>> + phy_disconnect(phydev); >>> if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node)) >>> of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(priv->dev->of_node); >>> if (priv->use_ncsi) >>> - fixed_phy_unregister(netdev->phydev); >>> + fixed_phy_unregister(phydev); >>> } >>> static void ftgmac100_destroy_mdio(struct net_device *netdev) >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect 2025-07-30 20:23 [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect Heiner Kallweit 2025-07-31 8:58 ` Dawid Osuchowski @ 2025-08-05 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2025-08-05 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Heiner Kallweit Cc: andrew+netdev, horms, kuba, davem, edumazet, pabeni, jacky_chou, jacob.e.keller, netdev Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:23:23 +0200 you wrote: > After the call to phy_disconnect() netdev->phydev is reset to NULL. > So fixed_phy_unregister() would be called with a NULL pointer as argument. > Therefore cache the phy_device before this call. > > Fixes: e24a6c874601 ("net: ftgmac100: Get link speed and duplex for NC-SI") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/e88fbc30dda1 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-05 23:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-07-30 20:23 [PATCH net] net: ftgmac100: fix potential NULL pointer access in ftgmac100_phy_disconnect Heiner Kallweit 2025-07-31 8:58 ` Dawid Osuchowski 2025-07-31 19:22 ` Heiner Kallweit 2025-08-01 6:19 ` Dawid Osuchowski 2025-08-05 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).