From: <VishvambarPanth.S@microchip.com>
To: <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <andrew@lunn.ch>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
<Bryan.Whitehead@microchip.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: microchip: lan743x : bidirectional throughuput improvement
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 05:17:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dde54385fcb38c1a66b7d09d6975d449dc5bdfde.camel@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5ffec56-5512-1acc-b85c-ac0771634c22@intel.com>
On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 10:35 -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
>
> On 9/27/2023 4:16 AM, Vishvambar Panth S wrote:
> > The LAN743x/PCI11xxx DMA descriptors are always 4 dwords long, but
> > the
> > device supports placing the descriptors in memory back to back or
> > reserving space in between them using its DMA_DESCRIPTOR_SPACE
> > (DSPACE)
> > configurable hardware setting. Currently DSPACE is unnecessarily
> > set to
> > match the host's L1 cache line size, resulting in space reserved in
> > between descriptors in most platforms and causing a suboptimal
> > behavior
> > (single PCIe Mem transaction per descriptor). By changing the
> > setting
> > to DSPACE=16 many descriptors can be packed in a single PCIe Mem
> > transaction resulting in a massive performance improvement in
> > bidirectional tests without any negative effects.
> > Tested and verified improvements on x64 PC and several ARM
> > platforms
> > (typical data below)
> >
>
> I assume here the choice of 16 is to get the 16 bytes from 4 dwords?
Thanks for the comments. Yes, it is set to 16 bytes to match the size
of the descriptors which are 4 dwords long.
>
> > Test setup 1: x64 PC with LAN7430 ---> x64 PC
> >
> > iperf3 UDP bidirectional with DSPACE set to L1 CACHE Size:
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > [ ID][Role] Interval Transfer Bitrate
> > [ 5][TX-C] 0.00-10.00 sec 170 MBytes 143 Mbits/sec sender
> > [ 5][TX-C] 0.00-10.04 sec 169 MBytes 141 Mbits/sec
> > receiver
> > [ 7][RX-C] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.02 GBytes 876 Mbits/sec sender
> > [ 7][RX-C] 0.00-10.04 sec 1.02 GBytes 870 Mbits/sec
> > receiver
> >
> > iperf3 UDP bidirectional with DSPACE set to 16 Bytes
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > [ ID][Role] Interval Transfer Bitrate
> > [ 5][TX-C] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.11 GBytes 956 Mbits/sec sender
> > [ 5][TX-C] 0.00-10.04 sec 1.11 GBytes 951 Mbits/sec
> > receiver
> > [ 7][RX-C] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.10 GBytes 948 Mbits/sec sender
> > [ 7][RX-C] 0.00-10.04 sec 1.10 GBytes 942 Mbits/sec
> > receiver
> >
>
> Going from barely transmitting to hitting the line rate *and*
> improving
> both Tx and Rx slightly is fantastic. Huge win just avoiding all that
> unnecessary wasted PCIe bandwidth.
>
> > Test setup 2 : RK3399 with LAN7430 ---> x64 PC
> >
> > RK3399 Spec:
> > The SOM-RK3399 is ARM module designed and developed by
> > FriendlyElec.
> > Cores: 64-bit Dual Core Cortex-A72 + Quad Core Cortex-A53
> > Frequency: Cortex-A72(up to 2.0GHz), Cortex-A53(up to 1.5GHz)
> > PCIe: PCIe x4, compatible with PCIe 2.1, Dual operation mode
> >
> > iperf3 UDP bidirectional with DSPACE set to L1 CACHE Size:
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > [ ID][Role] Interval Transfer Bitrate
> > [ 5][TX-C] 0.00-10.00 sec 534 MBytes 448 Mbits/sec sender
> > [ 5][TX-C] 0.00-10.05 sec 534 MBytes 446 Mbits/sec
> > receiver
> > [ 7][RX-C] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.12 GBytes 961 Mbits/sec sender
> > [ 7][RX-C] 0.00-10.05 sec 1.11 GBytes 946 Mbits/sec
> > receiver
> >
> > iperf3 UDP bidirectional with DSPACE set to 16 Bytes
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > [ ID][Role] Interval Transfer Bitrate
> > [ 5][TX-C] 0.00-10.00 sec 966 MBytes 810 Mbits/sec sender
> > [ 5][TX-C] 0.00-10.04 sec 965 MBytes 806 Mbits/sec
> > receiver
> > [ 7][RX-C] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.11 GBytes 956 Mbits/sec sender
> > [ 7][RX-C] 0.00-10.04 sec 1.07 GBytes 919 Mbits/sec
> > receiver
> >
> > Fixes: 23f0703c125b ("lan743x: Add main source files for new
> > lan743x driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Vishvambar Panth S <vishvambarpanth.s@microchip.com>
> > ---
>
> Always fun to see a massive win like this! Even just the 2x
> improvement
> on the RK3399 is huge, let alone 6x improvement on the x86 platform.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
>
> > drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.h
> > index 52609fc13ad9..6dac6fef7d24 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.h
> > @@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ struct lan743x_adapter {
> > #define DMA_DESCRIPTOR_SPACING_32 (32)
> > #define DMA_DESCRIPTOR_SPACING_64 (64)
> > #define DMA_DESCRIPTOR_SPACING_128 (128)
> > -#define DEFAULT_DMA_DESCRIPTOR_SPACING (L1_CACHE_BYTES)
> > +#define DEFAULT_DMA_DESCRIPTOR_SPACING
> > (DMA_DESCRIPTOR_SPACING_16)
> >
> > #define DMAC_CHANNEL_STATE_SET(start_bit, stop_bit) \
> > (((start_bit) ? 2 : 0) | ((stop_bit) ? 1 : 0))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-05 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-27 11:16 [PATCH net] net: microchip: lan743x : bidirectional throughuput improvement Vishvambar Panth S
2023-09-29 17:35 ` Jacob Keller
2023-10-05 5:17 ` VishvambarPanth.S [this message]
2023-10-04 19:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-04 20:02 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-10-04 20:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-11-01 7:20 ` VishvambarPanth.S
2023-11-09 10:53 ` VishvambarPanth.S
2023-11-09 23:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-11-16 5:49 ` VishvambarPanth.S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dde54385fcb38c1a66b7d09d6975d449dc5bdfde.camel@microchip.com \
--to=vishvambarpanth.s@microchip.com \
--cc=Bryan.Whitehead@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).