Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
	"Yuchung Cheng" <ycheng@google.com>,
	"Soheil Hassas Yeganeh" <soheil@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] tcp: add SACK compression
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 08:46:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df28b786-818e-540b-7e2e-63a604063e0b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58bcf9c0-e4f0-691d-8d6a-40ff3629f500@gmail.com>



On 05/17/2018 08:40 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/17/2018 08:14 AM, Neal Cardwell wrote:

>> Any particular motivation for the 2.5ms here? It might be nice to match the
>> existing TSO autosizing dynamics and use 1ms here instead of having a
>> separate new constant of 2.5ms. Smaller time scales here should lead to
>> less burstiness and queue pressure from data packets in the network, and we
>> know from experience that the CPU overhead of 1ms chunks is acceptable.
> 
> This came from my tests on wifi really :)
> 
> I also had the idea to make this threshold adjustable for wifi, like we did for sk_pacing_shift.
> 
> (On wifi, we might want to increase the max delay between ACK)
> 
> So maybe use 1ms delay, when sk_pacing_shift == 10, but increase it if sk_pacing_shift has been lowered.
> 
>

BTW, maybe my changelog or patch is not clear enough :

As soon as some packets are received in order, we send an ACK, even if the timer was armed.
(This is the beginning of __tcp_ack_snd_check())

When this ACK is sent, timer is canceled (in tcp_event_ack_sent())

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-17 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-17 12:12 [PATCH net-next 0/4] tcp: implement SACK compression Eric Dumazet
2018-05-17 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] tcp: use __sock_put() instead of sock_put() in tcp_clear_xmit_timers() Eric Dumazet
2018-05-17 14:53   ` Neal Cardwell
2018-05-17 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] tcp: do not force quickack when receiving out-of-order packets Eric Dumazet
2018-05-17 14:55   ` Neal Cardwell
2018-05-17 17:14   ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2018-05-17 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] tcp: add SACK compression Eric Dumazet
2018-05-17 15:14   ` Neal Cardwell
2018-05-17 15:40     ` Eric Dumazet
2018-05-17 15:46       ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-05-17 16:41       ` Neal Cardwell
2018-05-17 16:59         ` Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-17 17:15           ` Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-17 17:15           ` Eric Dumazet
2018-05-17 12:12 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] tcp: add TCPAckCompressed SNMP counter Eric Dumazet
2018-05-17 14:55   ` Neal Cardwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df28b786-818e-540b-7e2e-63a604063e0b@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    --cc=toke@toke.dk \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox