From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 5/6] xfrm: Convert the ->dst_lookup() callback to dscp_t.
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:11:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df58d9509a22ea12cbdfb312b57eb0eb6ea775ac.1728982714.git.gnault@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1728982714.git.gnault@redhat.com>
Pass a dscp_t variable to ->dst_lookup() callbacks (struct
xfrm_policy_afinfo), instead of an int, to prevent accidental setting
of ECN bits in ->flowi4_tos.
This callback is only called by __xfrm_dst_lookup(), which already has
a dscp_t variable to pass as parameter. We just need to remove the
inet_dscp_to_dsfield() conversion.
There are two implementations of this callback: xfrm6_dst_lookup(),
which doesn't use the modified parameter, and xfrm4_dst_lookup() which
needs to convert it again before calling __xfrm4_dst_lookup().
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
---
include/net/xfrm.h | 4 ++--
net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c | 8 +++++---
net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c | 5 +++--
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 3 +--
4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index 18c0a6077ae9..46c82d75679a 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -355,8 +355,8 @@ struct xfrm_type;
struct xfrm_dst;
struct xfrm_policy_afinfo {
struct dst_ops *dst_ops;
- struct dst_entry *(*dst_lookup)(struct net *net,
- int tos, int oif,
+ struct dst_entry *(*dst_lookup)(struct net *net, dscp_t dscp,
+ int oif,
const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
const xfrm_address_t *daddr,
u32 mark);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
index 0294fef577fa..342a0158da91 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <net/inet_dscp.h>
#include <linux/inetdevice.h>
#include <net/dst.h>
#include <net/xfrm.h>
@@ -40,14 +41,15 @@ static struct dst_entry *__xfrm4_dst_lookup(struct net *net, struct flowi4 *fl4,
return ERR_CAST(rt);
}
-static struct dst_entry *xfrm4_dst_lookup(struct net *net, int tos, int oif,
- const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
+static struct dst_entry *xfrm4_dst_lookup(struct net *net, dscp_t dscp,
+ int oif, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
const xfrm_address_t *daddr,
u32 mark)
{
struct flowi4 fl4;
- return __xfrm4_dst_lookup(net, &fl4, tos, oif, saddr, daddr, mark);
+ return __xfrm4_dst_lookup(net, &fl4, inet_dscp_to_dsfield(dscp), oif,
+ saddr, daddr, mark);
}
static int xfrm4_get_saddr(struct net *net, int oif,
diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
index b1d81c4270ab..0c28b22ae3c1 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c
@@ -18,13 +18,14 @@
#include <net/addrconf.h>
#include <net/dst.h>
#include <net/xfrm.h>
+#include <net/inet_dscp.h>
#include <net/ip.h>
#include <net/ipv6.h>
#include <net/ip6_route.h>
#include <net/l3mdev.h>
-static struct dst_entry *xfrm6_dst_lookup(struct net *net, int tos, int oif,
- const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
+static struct dst_entry *xfrm6_dst_lookup(struct net *net, dscp_t dscp,
+ int oif, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
const xfrm_address_t *daddr,
u32 mark)
{
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index a1b499cc840c..db2e602971fd 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -282,8 +282,7 @@ struct dst_entry *__xfrm_dst_lookup(struct net *net, dscp_t dscp, int oif,
if (unlikely(afinfo == NULL))
return ERR_PTR(-EAFNOSUPPORT);
- dst = afinfo->dst_lookup(net, inet_dscp_to_dsfield(dscp), oif, saddr,
- daddr, mark);
+ dst = afinfo->dst_lookup(net, dscp, oif, saddr, daddr, mark);
rcu_read_unlock();
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-15 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-15 9:11 [PATCH net-next 0/6] xfrm: Convert __xfrm4_dst_lookup() and its callers to dscp_t Guillaume Nault
2024-10-15 9:11 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] xfrm: Convert xfrm_get_tos() " Guillaume Nault
2024-10-15 9:11 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] xfrm: Convert xfrm_bundle_create() " Guillaume Nault
2024-10-15 9:11 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] xfrm: Convert xfrm_dst_lookup() " Guillaume Nault
2024-10-15 11:48 ` Eyal Birger
2024-10-16 8:23 ` Guillaume Nault
2024-10-15 9:11 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] xfrm: Convert __xfrm_dst_lookup() " Guillaume Nault
2024-10-15 9:11 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2024-10-15 9:11 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] xfrm: Convert __xfrm4_dst_lookup() " Guillaume Nault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df58d9509a22ea12cbdfb312b57eb0eb6ea775ac.1728982714.git.gnault@redhat.com \
--to=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).