From: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
To: devnull+corey.leavitt.info@kernel.org
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, andrew@lunn.ch, corey@leavitt.info,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
kory.maincent@bootlin.com, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, o.rempel@pengutronix.de,
pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 4/4] net: phy: own phydev->psec via PSE notifier and remove fwnode_mdio hook
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 21:15:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e00048dd-1ed3-40c3-9912-59bccf015ad5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423-pse-notifier-decouple-v1-4-86ed750a9d62@leavitt.info>
Hi,
this patch seems to cause a deadlock with PHYs which provide SFP
ports. Noticed this downstream in OpenWrt with Realtek RTL8214FC
using an extension to the upstream driver [1].
I suspect the deadlock happens because phy_device_register takes
rtnl_lock with this patch. But further down in the call chain,
phy_sfp_probe is called, calling sfp_bus_add_upstream which in turn
tries to take rtnl_lock again.
While the downstream driver part still calls phy_sfp_probe itself,
backporting the phy_port changes to 6.18 and adjusting the driver
doesn't help. If I got it correctly, the phy_sfp_probe just moves
into phylib core but still causes the deadlock.
Kind regards,
Jonas Jelonek
[1] https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/openwrt/tree/target/linux/realtek/files-6.18/drivers/net/phy/realtek/realtek_multiport.c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 7:42 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/4] net: pse-pd: decouple controller lookup from MDIO probe Corey Leavitt via B4 Relay
2026-04-23 7:42 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/4] net: pse-pd: scope pse_control regulator handle to kref lifetime Corey Leavitt via B4 Relay
2026-04-24 8:36 ` Kory Maincent
2026-04-23 7:42 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/4] net: pse-pd: add notifier chain for controller lifecycle events Corey Leavitt via B4 Relay
2026-04-23 7:42 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/4] net: pse-pd: fire lifecycle events on controller register/unregister Corey Leavitt via B4 Relay
2026-04-23 7:42 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 4/4] net: phy: own phydev->psec via PSE notifier and remove fwnode_mdio hook Corey Leavitt via B4 Relay
2026-04-24 12:36 ` Kory Maincent
2026-05-28 19:15 ` Jonas Jelonek [this message]
2026-04-23 9:05 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/4] net: pse-pd: decouple controller lookup from MDIO probe Kory Maincent
2026-04-23 9:48 ` Corey Leavitt
2026-04-24 12:41 ` Kory Maincent
2026-04-26 21:25 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-05-02 20:10 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-05-05 4:36 ` Corey Leavitt
2026-06-15 18:08 ` Carlo Szelinsky
2026-06-16 16:42 ` Kory Maincent
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-23 7:22 Corey Leavitt
2026-04-23 7:23 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 4/4] net: phy: own phydev->psec via PSE notifier and remove fwnode_mdio hook Corey Leavitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e00048dd-1ed3-40c3-9912-59bccf015ad5@gmail.com \
--to=jelonek.jonas@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=corey@leavitt.info \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devnull+corey.leavitt.info@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox