From: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jay Cornwall <Jay.Cornwall@amd.com>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Schmidt <alexs@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: AtomicOps: Define valid root port capabilities
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 11:43:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e02ca89a1de3a21aecdebf9bbeb5fcf1e7464eb4.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310214923.GA823330@bhelgaas>
On Tue, 2026-03-10 at 16:49 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Gerd Bayer wrote:
> > Provide the two combinations of Atomic Op Completion size attributes
> > that a root port may support per PCIe Spec 7.0 section 6.15.3.1. -
> > besides the trivial "No support" - as two new defines.
> >
> > Change documentation of pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() that these are
> > the only ones that should be used. Also, spell out that all requested
> > capabilities need to be supported at the root port for enable to
> > succeed. Also emphasize that on success, this sets AtomicOpsCtl:ReqEn to
> > 1, and leaves it untouched in case of failure.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/pci.c | 13 +++++++------
> > include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 8 ++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index 8479c2e1f74f1044416281aba11bf071ea89488a..cc8abe6b1d07661488895876dbbcf8aaeadf4a17 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -3663,15 +3663,16 @@ void pci_acs_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > /**
> > * pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root - enable AtomicOp requests to root port
> > * @dev: the PCI device
> > - * @cap_mask: mask of desired AtomicOp sizes, including one or more of:
> > - * PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ATOMIC_COMP32
> > - * PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ATOMIC_COMP64
> > - * PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ATOMIC_COMP128
> > + * @cap_mask: root port must support combinations of AtomicOp sizes
> > + * PCI_EXP_ROOT_PORT_ATOMIC_BASE
> > + * PCI_EXP_ROOT_PORT_ATOMIC_FULL
> > *
> > * Return 0 if all upstream bridges support AtomicOp routing, egress
> > * blocking is disabled on all upstream ports, and the root port supports
> > - * the requested completion capabilities (32-bit, 64-bit and/or 128-bit
> > - * AtomicOp completion), or negative otherwise.
> > + * all the requested completion capabilities (BASE: 32-bit, 64-bit or
> > + * FULL: 32/64- and 128-bit AtomicOp completion). In that case enable the
> > + * device to send AtomicOp requests. Otherwise, return negative and leave
> > + * the enablement in the PCI config space untouched.
> > */
> > int pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 cap_mask)
> > {
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > index 14f634ab9350d5442192162225b5e5202dbe2308..63ac62b882a94c6873a0db433ba808332ddbea04 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> > @@ -669,6 +669,14 @@
> > #define PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ATOMIC_COMP32 0x00000080 /* 32b AtomicOp completion */
> > #define PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ATOMIC_COMP64 0x00000100 /* 64b AtomicOp completion */
> > #define PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ATOMIC_COMP128 0x00000200 /* 128b AtomicOp completion */
> > +/* PCIe spec 7.0 6.15.3.1: Root ports may support one of 2 sets of Atomic Ops */
> > +#define PCI_EXP_ROOT_PORT_ATOMIC_BASE \
> > + (PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ATOMIC_COMP32 | \
> > + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ATOMIC_COMP64)
> > +#define PCI_EXP_ROOT_PORT_ATOMIC_FULL \
> > + (PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ATOMIC_COMP32 | \
> > + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ATOMIC_COMP64 | \
> > + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ATOMIC_COMP128)
>
> I'm sort of ambivalent about this patch, partly because it adds
> these #defines that aren't used anywhere. Also, the "BASE" and "FULL"
> names don't contain as much information as mentioning COMP32, COMP64,
> and COMP128 does.
Hi Bjorn,
I see your point. This patch is better suited to lead into a separate
small series that continues on to actually propose corrections of
today's (mis-)use of pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() in the
corresponding device drivers.
> If we *do* want this, I think these combo definitions are beyond the
> scope of uapi/linux/pci_regs.h, which generally is just
> transliteration of register bits from the spec. They could possibly
> go in linux/pci.h where pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() is declared.
I like this idea, I'll move the "valid combination" defines to
linux/pci.h
>
> > #define PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_LTR 0x00000800 /* Latency tolerance reporting */
> > #define PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_TPH_COMP_MASK 0x00003000 /* TPH completer support */
> > #define PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_OBFF_MASK 0x000c0000 /* OBFF support mechanism */
> >
> > --
> > 2.51.0
> >
Thanks, Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 17:13 [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI: AtomicOps: Fix pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() Gerd Bayer
2026-03-06 17:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: AtomicOps: Define valid root port capabilities Gerd Bayer
2026-03-10 21:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-11 10:43 ` Gerd Bayer [this message]
2026-03-06 17:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: AtomicOps: Fix logic in enable function Gerd Bayer
2026-03-10 21:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-11 12:19 ` Gerd Bayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e02ca89a1de3a21aecdebf9bbeb5fcf1e7464eb4.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Jay.Cornwall@amd.com \
--cc=alexs@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox